Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: latest tech innovations
Moto G Power 2025: It’s OK to stick with last year’s model
Motorola’s 2025 update to the Moto G Power ($299.99) is about as minor a refresh as you can get. The phone has a slightly larger screen and a more comprehensive waterproof rating—and that’s about it. The carried-over cameras are average at best, and, puzzlingly, the new processor produces worse performance than the 2024 model. Ultimately, we prefer the better battery life, sharper cameras, and longer support window of the $299.99 Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, which is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable phones.
Design: It Looks More Expensive That It Is
The Moto G Power looks like a premium phone despite its low price. It features the same stylish rounded corners and thin bezels found on most modern phones, and the vegan leather back is soft to the touch and looks sophisticated right out of the box. It measures 6.56 by 3.04 by 0.34 inches (HWD) and weighs 7.34 ounces, which is bigger and heavier than the 2024 version (6.47 by 2.95 by 0.32 inches, 6.84 ounces), while the Samsung Galaxy A25 (6.34 by 3.01 by 0.33 inches, 6.95 ounces) is marginally shorter and lighter.
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. See how we test.(Credit: Sarah Lord)
The Moto G Power comes in two colors: Leaf Green or Slate Gray. The Slate Gray version is featured in this review. While the vegan leather back is easy to grip and appealing to look at, it does have a major problem: It’s a dirt, dust, and debris magnet. It picks up any small particles it comes in contact with and holds onto them for dear life. Within five minutes of unboxing it, I noticed hair and dust attached to the phone’s rear cover. I tried to wipe it away but to no avail. Eventually, I had to use a damp paper towel to clean it effectively. This phone demands a case just to keep it clean—which somewhat negates Motorola’s efforts to make it look and feel nice.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
The same material also covers the three-camera array, so while the bump may look pleasing, it’s destined to attract unwanted debris.
The combined SIM card/microSD tray is on the left side of the phone, while the volume rocker and power button are on the right. The buttons feel high-end and make a satisfying click when pressed. The bottom edge of the phone has a 3.5mm headphone jack, a USB-C port for charging, and a speaker grille. A small, circular cutout for the selfie camera sits at the top of the display.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
The power button has a built-in fingerprint scanner, or you can use the selfie camera for facial recognition. I found the fingerprint scanner slower than I would have liked, but facial recognition worked well. Keep in mind that the fingerprint reader is more secure.
One of the phone’s biggest improvements is a more robust IP rating to protect it against dust and water. The phone has an IP68/IP69 rating, which means it can withstand immersion in about five feet of fresh water for up to 30 minutes. It can also withstand high-pressure water jets at high temperatures. Most phones in this price range—including the Galaxy A25—lack an IP rating altogether.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
Display: Not Bad for the Price
The Moto G Power has a 6.8-inch display, up from the 6.7-inch screen on last year’s model, and a similar resolution of 2,388 by 1,080 pixels. It also carries over the 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, which is great for gaming. The phone’s display is clear and bright. It struggled under direct sunlight in testing, but I had no problems watching videos in most lighting conditions.
(Credit: Sarah Lord )
For comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 has a slightly sharper 6.5-inch display (2,340 by 1,080, which has more pixels per inch because it’s smaller) with a refresh rate of 120Hz.
Performance: Not as Powerful as Last Year’s Model
Like the 2024 Moto G Power, the 2025 edition comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, though you can expand that up to 1TB via the microSD slot. This year, the phone runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor. While it’s newer than the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 found on the 2024 model, it’s a step down in processor class and not as powerful.
Everyday tasks like opening apps and navigating around the user interface feel identical to the 2024 model, but benchmark testing reveals slower performance across the board.
(Credit: Geekbench/GFXBench/PCMag)
We use Geekbench 6 to test CPU performance and the Moto G Power scored 795 on the single-core test and 2,095 on the multi-core test. This is a notable drop from the 889 and 2,345 results from the 2024 model. The Galaxy A25 (which is powered by a Exynos 1280) did much better in the single-core test (964) and similarly in the multi-core test (2,058).
Graphics performance is also not as good. In the GFXBench Aztec Ruins gaming test, it ran at 6.4 frames per second (fps) compared with the 2024 model’s 7.2fps and the Galaxy A25’s 10fps.
You can still play graphics-intensive games on the Moto G Power, but they don’t perform particularly well. I was able to load Genshin Impact, though it stuttered quite a bit during gameplay, especially in combat-heavy situations. Casual games like Alto’s Odyssey play better.
Battery Life: Reliable, But Not a Standout
The Moto G Power carries over the 5,000mAh battery from its predecessor. To test it, I played a YouTube video on loop over Wi-Fi at full-screen brightness. The 2025 model lasted 12 hours and 15 minutes on a single charge—exactly the same as its predecessor. The Galaxy A25 outlasted it with a battery life of 13 hours and 10 minutes.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
The phone supports wired charging at 30W and wireless charging at 15W. In comparison, the Galaxy A25 supports 25W wired charging but doesn’t support wireless charging at all.
When plugged in, the phone charged from zero to 100% in 1 hour and 58 minutes, while the A25 took 1 hour and 25 minutes.
Connections: Just the Basics
The Moto G Power supports sub-6GHz and C-band 5G in the US, but not the faster mmWave technology offered by some networks. I tested the phone using the Google Fi network, which runs on T-Mobile towers. Cell service isn’t amazing in my area, but the Moto G Power still managed speeds of 104Mbps down and 7.96Mbps up. My iPhone 14 Pro on T-Mobile performed better when tested in the same location, with download speeds of 154Mbps and upload speeds of 4.91Mbps.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
The phone includes Wi-Fi 6, but not 6E or 7. When tested next to my Wi-Fi 6 router, the phone reached download speeds of 212Mbps and upload speeds of 23Mbps. My iPhone 14 Pro got download speeds of 391Mbps and upload speeds of 22.4Mbps from the same spot. Neither phone performed well at the edge of the Wi-Fi network, where the Moto G Power got 31.7Mbps down and 20.7Mbps up, and the iPhone only mustered 8.83Mbps down and 8.16Mbps up.
Bluetooth 5.3 and NFC are also onboard.
Audio: Good Call Quality, Decent Speaker
Call quality is good. I never had an issue hearing callers or being heard by them. The earpiece peaked at 74.2dB, while the speaker phone maxed out at 83.1dB. These are respectable levels that should be more than loud enough for most people.
The phone supports Dolby Atmos and does a surprisingly good job of filling a small room with sound. The opening bass line in our test track, The Knife’s “Silent Shout,” actually vibrated the phone in my hand. Of course, you’ll get the best sound by connecting either wired headphones via the 3.5mm headphone jack or wireless earphones.
Cameras: Average All Around
The camera hardware remains identical to last year’s model. The phone has a 50MP main camera with an aperture of f/1.8 and optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultra-wide camera with an aperture of f/2.2 that doubles as the macro camera, and a 16MP front-facing camera with an aperture of f/2.4 for selfies. This year, there are four zoom modes instead of the three found in the 2024 version: macro, 0.5x, 1x, and 2x.
Main camera (Credit: Sarah Lord)
The camera’s sensors struggle with detail, even in bright light. Colors appear artificially bright, while zooming in your photos reveals pixelation and smudging. Here is a progression of the same scene at 0.5x, 1x, and 2x:
Ultra-wide camera at 0.5x (Credit: Sarah Lord )
Main camera at 1x (Credit: Sarah Lord)
Main camera at 2x (Credit: Sarah Lord)
The cameras can record 1080p video at 30fps, and the quality is middling. It should be fine for taking home videos of kids or pets, but the footage falls short under scrutiny.
Selfie camera (Credit: Sarah Lord)
Likewise, the selfie camera did an average job of taking a picture of my dog in low light.
Software: Not as Much Support as Samsung
The Moto G Power comes with Android 15 installed, and Motorola says it will offer two years of OS upgrades and three years of security updates. This is well behind Samsung’s A25, which offers four years of OS upgrades and five years of security patches.
(Credit: Sarah Lord)
Thankfully, Motorola has reduced the amount of bloatware this year. It’s still there, of course, but in a way that’s far less intrusive. I’m thankful that the company has removed the large Shopping and Entertainment folders found on last year’s model.
Verdict: A Step in the Wrong Direction
The Motorola Moto G Power for 2025 is almost identical to its predecessor, and that’s not a good thing. Aside from a more durable rating and a marginally larger display, its cameras, battery life, and design are carried over from last year’s model. The biggest issue is the new processor, which delivers slower performance year over year, making the phone hard to recommend. For the same price, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has better cameras, longer battery life, and superior software support, making it our Editors’ Choice.
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
Pros
The Bottom Line
The 2025 version of the Motorola Moto G Power takes a surprising step back from its predecessor with a less powerful processor that results in slower performance.
Like What You’re Reading?
This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
By clicking the button, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our
Terms of Use and
Privacy Policy.
You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.About Sarah Lord
Analyst, Mobile
Read the latest from Sarah Lord
Vintage Apple, ThinkPad, and Commodore computers still hold their allure
When Levi Maaia’s mother, a school teacher, brought home the Apple IIGS in the late ‘80s, to say it made a lasting impact is an understatement.
He and his family used the computer far beyond its recommended lifespan, even after Apple stopped making it. But that didn’t stop Maaia from using the IIGS.
“We upgraded it, added hard drives — just tried to do what we could to hold on to it a little bit longer,” Maaia says.
However, by 1994, technology had advanced too far to continue using the PC. The family packed up the IIGS and put it in the basement, where it stayed for 30 years — until Maaia visited his parents after the pandemic.
“My mom said, ‘Do you want that Apple IIGS downstairs? What are you going to do with it?’ And I said, ‘No, no, I definitely want it. I definitely want it.”
VCF exhibitor Levia Maaia brought the Apple IIGS from his childhood to the show. At the time (1986), this PC featured the best graphics and sound of the entire Apple II family. However, review publications had mixed opinions about it. Compute! considered the IIGS a serious competitor to the Commodore Amiga and the Atari ST, while BYTE thought its aging architecture would only encourage software developers to improve programs initially written for the Apple II. (Image credit: Future) Gallery: These 15 vintage PCs shaped the way we think about laptops today
Perhaps by some miracle of the silicon gods, the PC made the trip back to Maaia’s home on the West Coast from his family’s home on the East Coast in one piece. From that moment of nostalgia, his fascination with vintage PCs was reborn.
“I call my exhibit at the show Levi’s Retro Bridge because it’s sort of a bridge between the past and the present. What most interests me about these computers is that people are still interested in them 35, 40 years later.”
The “show” is the SoCal Vintage Computer Festival, held this month in Orange, California, about two miles from Angel Stadium, where the Los Angeles Angels play baseball.
“My mom said, ‘Do you want that Apple IIGS downstairs? What are you going to do with it?’ And I said, ‘No, no, I definitely want it. I definitely want it.”
If you didn’t know better, you might have thought the festival was a massive garage sale held in a hotel conference center. Grade school-aged kids were intensely focused on playing 90s-era educational PC games — the same ones I played when I was their age.
The beige walls couldn’t contain the excited chatter of hundreds of attendees, who bent over to peer at an electronic relic or played with a custom-made game emulator.
Cables and adapters snaked their way across neatly aligned cloth-covered folding tables, bulbous CRT TVs were stacked on top of one another like bricks, and ‘70s- and ’80s-era computers I had never heard of were lined up on neatly arranged tables.
What emerged during conversations with Maaia and other exhibitors at the two-year-old festival was a sense of calm amid the fast-moving technology developments of right now.
Jason Moore exhibited his “Franken” Amiga 500 at VCF, using components acquired from several countries. The PC uses a Raspberry Pi and a PiStorm CPU accelerator to emulate the original Motorola 68000 CPU but transmits data directly through the other hardware components. (The transparent case and LEDs are obviously not original.) The Amiga 500’s multitasking graphics capabilities made it the most popular Amiga home computer in 1987 — especially among gamers. (Image credit: Future) Gallery: These 15 vintage PCs shaped the way we think about laptops today
Many of the vintage PCs I saw at the show were not in working condition when their owners first acquired them.
Jason Moore, who has been collecting old PCs for 25 years, put it to me this way: “To really love this hobby, you have to kind of get into repair,” said Moore. “A lot of the components are failing. The chips are failing. I had a lot of systems that were not functioning.”
“People thought it was junk at that point.”
Moore, who spends his days as department chair, and professor of computational biomedicine at Cedars-Sinai, had to teach himself how to repair the old PCs and electronics he found himself amassing.
He bought an oscilloscope to diagnose issues and learned how to solder to bring those machines back to life. His love of computers began in the seventh grade when his parents bought him his first computer — an Atari 400. “I absolutely loved it,” Moore tells Laptop Mag. It was the catalyst for what became his lifelong love for the Atari.
Back then, systems and software from the late 20th century were inexpensive at thrift stores and flea markets, and Moore’s new hobby had a low barrier to entry. “People thought it was junk at that point,” he says. Since 2000, his collection has grown to include Amiga, Commodore, Apple, Radio Shack TRS-80s, and Texas Instruments machines.
It’s people like Moore who do this kind of work for the love of it that help museum curators like Anna Atkeson do their job.
As the executive director of the Paul Gray Personal Computing Museum at Claremont Graduate University in California, Atkeson was at VCF exhibiting part of the museum’s collection and getting the word out about its mission of getting the public to see and contemplate how computers affect our lives.
I’m not super well-versed in computer history right now, but this is kind of awesome.
Atkeson originally wanted to pursue a career creating art for video games but was interested in vintage computers from a vintage games perspective. Midway through college, she switched her focus to museum studies, intending to work in art or history museums. Ultimately, she found herself working at the Paul Gray PCM.
“I was like, okay, you know what? I’m not super well-versed in computer history right now, but this is kind of awesome. So I’m gonna do it,” said Atkeson.
Anna Atkenson (right), executive director of the Paul Gray Personal Computing Museum, with the museum’s intern, Sophie Lin (left), at their exhibit booth. The museum’s founder, Paul Gray, taught at Claremont Graduate University from 1983 to 2001, where he established the Center for Information Systems and Technology. Gray was fascinated with how personal computing impacted people’s lives. After Gray retired, he donated his collection of PCs, which he had amassed during his tenure at the university, to the museum. (Image credit: Future) At 30 years old, she is not only super well-versed in vintage computer history but also more well-versed than I am as a 37-year-old tech journalist whose first PC was a ‘90s IBM PS ValuePoint.
Atkeson’s first computer was a laptop, and she admitted that before starting her job at the museum, she only intellectually understood that there was a time when people did not take their computers everywhere with them. But when she saw one of the first portable computers ever made (a 26-pound, suitcase-shaped PC) for the first time, the historical significance of her laptop and how revolutionary it was for society hit home.
Compared to vintage computers, today’s modern PCs are much more like appliances. You don’t have to know how they work to use them. This is a stark contrast to the computers of decades ago, illustrated so clearly by the machines on display at the festival
“You can control, with programming, exactly what the hardware is doing,” says Moore about computers from 40 years ago. “Today, when you program in Python or any high-level programming language, there are several layers of abstraction between the code that you write and what the hardware is actually doing.”
“I can open up an Atari, point and say, ‘this does this, and this does this, and here’s how it works, here’s how it all works together.’ That’s harder to do with modern computers because so much of that is integrated into a single chip,” says Moore.
Maaia also tells me about a realization he’s made: Using older technology shows that the people who designed vintage software understood the entire system.
AI is making it even easier to interact with computers — but it’s also making it easier to take modern computing technology for granted.
Atkeson, the teacher and museum director, noticed this difference, too. In her digital art class, the students who grew up with Chromebooks and modern MacBooks didn’t fully understand the concept of a file tree because they relied on the search function.
“Knowing how the machines we use work is important but at the same time, user-friendliness is important,” says Atkeson. “The graphics user interface was revolutionary because it made computing accessible to so many people. You didn’t have to learn to have to learn to interact through a command line.”
Out of her entire IBM and ThinkPad collection, VCF Exhibitor Katarina Melki’s favorite is the Palm Top PC 110. Released exclusively in Japan in 1995, the cheapest model was configured with an Intel 486SX CPU, 4MB of flash memory instead of a hard disk drive, and a stylus-compatible LCD display. It also came preinstalled with the Japanese version of PC DOS 7.0. While the PC 110 was generally well-received, it was criticized for its too-small keyboard. (Image credit: Future) Now, AI is making it even easier to interact with computers — but it’s also making it easier to take modern computing technology for granted.
While there may be no immediate answers about our technological future at the Vintage Computer Festival, there was an abundance of opportunity to consider how we can shape it — by learning about how we got here in the first place.
Events like VCF and people like Moore, Maaia, and Atkeson show that tech literacy comes in many forms and can be understood by anyone regardless of background or focus of study. That kind of interdisciplinary use — and how we use it — is what will shape our future.
Gallery: These 15 vintage PCs shaped the way we think about laptops today
More from Laptop Mag
LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask review: the future of LED face masks has arrived
Many of the best LED face masks tackle the signs of ageing using red and infrared LEDs to boost skin collagen levels, which naturally decline as we get older. But what if wrinkles and fine lines aren’t your only skincare concern?
Internal and external factors such as sun exposure, hormonal changes, pollution, stress, diet and poor sleep can all affect the appearance of our skin, leading to issues including acne, hyperpigmentation, redness, inflammation, dullness and dark circles, to name a few. So, what’s the solution?
Step forward the brand-new LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask from Project E Beauty, which boasts an impressive eight treatment modes to tackle over 10 of the most common skin care concerns using the power of different coloured LED lights, including purple, yellow, cyan, green and, of course, red and near-infrared. Want to know how it works? Read on.
LUMALUX FACE PRO LED LIGHT THERAPY MASK REVIEW: PRICE AND AVAILABILITY
The LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask is now available to buy for a recommended retail price of £309 from Project E Beauty.
(Image credit: Joanna Ebsworth)
LUMALUX FACE PRO LED LIGHT THERAPY MASK REVIEW: UNBOXING AND DESIGN
Inside the box, you’ll find the LED mask itself, plus the controller, USB-C charging cable, carry bag and instruction manual. So far, so standard. But it’s the number of LED bulbs on the mask’s interior that will catch your eye on first inspection.
Hailed as Project E Beauty’s ‘most advanced LED mask for deeper skin renewal’, the LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask features an astonishing 800 high-grade LEDs, which Project E Beauty says is 400% more LEDs that the industry standard.
Divided into four LEDs per bulb, you get 200 red LEDs, 200 blue LEDs and 200 green LEDs to make different kinds of colour light therapy, plus 180 Infrared LEDs and 20 deep infrared LEDs, all densely packed across the interior of the mask for optimal face coverage, precise light delivery, and maximal energy absorption.
Indeed, this mask intentionally has a very thin slit at the mouth area for integrated lip coverage, so you can also enjoy a targeted LED lip treatment to enhance collagen and elasticity for younger, fuller-looking lips while still being able to breathe.
Made from 100% soft, supple silicone with padded, built-in eye protection, the LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask weighs just 307g, so it’s incredibly lightweight and comfortably fits the face courtesy of the wide, built-in straps that secure with large Velcro pads for an adjustable fit.
Wireless and portable, you’ll need to charge the controller for five hours to get a full charge, but it will potentially last you for weeks as each treatment lasts for just three minutes (more on that later).
To turn it on, long press the controller’s power button for two seconds to automatically activate the first of the seven LED light therapy colour modes: Deep Rejuvenation Mode, using deep infrared, infrared, and red. To access the other colour modes, keep pressing the mode button.
(Image credit: Joanna Ebsworth)
LUMALUX FACE PRO LED LIGHT THERAPY MASK: FEATURES
I’ve touched upon the 20 deep infrared LEDs a couple of times, but let’s not skirt over them. Deep infrared is a fairly new addition to high-end LED masks, going much deeper than red light wavelengths (630nm) and infrared light wavelengths (850nm) to penetrate the skin at 1072nm, thus supporting advanced phase collagen production to help tackle more advanced signs of aging.
Moreover, the 20 deep infrared LEDs in this mask are positioned across key facial zones identified as ‘high impact’ areas for skin ageing, including the forehead, crow’s feet, frown lines, and areas around the mouth. When combined with red and infrared in the first mode, these deep infrared LEDs create ‘peak power zones’ that deliver concentrated, highly targeted light therapy to prevent and smooth out wrinkle formation.
But that’s not all, because this mask provides seven other colour modes to tackle a multitude of skin concerns using science-backed light wavelengths. Let’s break them down:
Deep Rejuvenation mode: Deep Infrared (1072nm) + Infrared (850nm) + Red light (630nm)
Clinically proven to be the most powerful anti-ageing LED light therapy combination on the market for cellular rejuvenation and collagen enhancement. Works beyond the skin’s surface to target muscles, joints, and nerves to reduce inflammation and enhance skin health from the outside in.
Intense Youth Boost mode: Infrared (850nm) + Red (630nm)
Prevents ageing by triggering collagen and elastin production to promote younger-looking skin while softening the appearance of existing wrinkles.
Blemish Control mode: Blue (460nm)
Targets acne by applying intense blue light wavelengths to the outer skin layer to destroy acne-causing bacteria P-acnes. Blue light also reduces pore size, regulates excess oil production, and treats other inflammatory markers such as redness and inflammation.
Calm and Clear mode: Purple, combing Red (630nm) + Blue (460nm)
A powerful anti-blemish treatment that reinforces the collagen matrix while treating and preventing acne breakouts. Acne can damage the skin barrier, so red light helps to repair skin while blue light helps to heal.
Balance and Brighten mode: Green (520nm)
A mode to target hyperpigmentation and uneven skin tone such as dark spots, melasma, dark eye circles and rough texture. Intensely brightens dull and lackluster skin while supporting cell turnover for enhanced radiance.
Soothing Harmony mode: Cyan, combining Green (520nm) + Blue (460nm)
Cyan light therapy is a unique combination of blue and green wavelengths designed to deeply purify and soothe inflamed and sensitive skin. Beneficial for the treatment of rosacea and other skin conditions accompanied by redness.
Glow Enhancer mode: Yellow, combining Red (630nm) + Green (520nm)
Red and green light wavelengths stimulate the production of red blood cells and remove toxins and other impurities from the skin. Clinically proven to soften skin texture and reduce roughness in four weeks
Full Spectrum Boost mode: White, combining Blue (460nm) + Red (630nm) + Green (520nm)
An all-in-one treatment combining all visible light wavelengths to trigger cellular renewal and transform overall complexion. To be used as a final treatment after other modes
Because this mask uses multiple LEDs that are densely packed together, it is deemed very powerful, so each treatment mode is limited to just three minutes per session. For the best results, Project E Beauty recommends you use the mask three to five times a week for three minutes per session, and that you limit yourself to two modes per day for a maximum of six minutes all together to avoid skin irritation.
LUMALUX FACE PRO LED LIGHT THERAPY MASK: PERFORMANCE
First off, this lightweight mask feels almost weightless when worn, applying zero pressure to the nose and forehead. I found the fit slightly loose across the lower half of my face – probably because it has just the one central strap as opposed two straps at the top and bottom – but the mask’s generous size and shape ensures you get great light therapy coverage.
Nearly all the LED masks I’ve tried before have wide mouth holes so you can breathe easy and drink through a straw during lengthier treatments. The obvious downside of this, however, is that your lips and surrounding areas don’t get to enjoy the benefits of the LED rays.
To get around this, I’ve previously used the CurrentBody Skin LED Lip Perfector device to plump and soften my lips, but there’s no need for an additional gadget with the LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask. It provides great coverage across the mouth area, and because the treatments last for just three minutes, you won’t miss taking a sip of water.
I wasn’t sure how efficacious the three-minute treatments would be, but I put my trust in the mask’s clinical-level power and used it five times a week for a month, often doing one treatment in the morning and one before bed to take full advantage. Bonus alert: because the sessions are so short, they fit easily into your morning and evening cleansing regime.
(Image credit: Joanna Ebsworth)
As a perimenopausal woman in her 40s with hormonal acne, dark circles, hyperpigmentation from sun damage, and several signs of ageing, I sometimes struggled to decide what mode I wanted to use, because I wanted to use them all!
In the end, I mainly used the Deep Rejuvenation mode in the morning to plump and prevent fine lines, and selected the Soothing Harmony mode before bed to address most of my other skin concerns, including acne, inflammation, redness, hyperpigmentation and dark circles.
Project E Beauty say results vary depending on the concerns being addressed, so while relief from acne, redness and irritation may be immediate, the long-term benefits of red and infrared light therapy may take two to three months to fully take effect.
Personally, I noticed any signs acne and inflammation were immediately soothed and minimised, helping to prevent any major breakouts during the course of testing. By the end of the month, my skin tone was also noticeably more even, brighter, and less red, and I am looking forward to seeing whether continued use of the Cyan mode will improve my hyperpigmentation and redness further.
Finally, I’m in love with the deep infrared LEDs placed strategically on ‘high impact’ facial zones. I’m positive they helped to visibly smooth the pesky lines on my forehead where I raise my eyebrows – I thought these were ingrained, but I was wrong! – as well as the marionette lines around my mouth. Overall, I’m seriously impressed.
LUMALUX FACE PRO LED LIGHT THERAPY MASK: VERDICT
The Lumalux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask offers eight scientifically-proven treatment modes – seven LED light therapy colour modes, plus infrared and deep infrared light therapy – to combat all your skincare concerns, including ageing, hyperpigmentation, acne, redness, dark circles and more.
Uber-lightweight and comfortable to wear, treatments take just 3 minutes per session to fit seamlessly into your life. Even better, the 20 deep infrared LEDs deeply penetrate the skin at 1072nm to tackle wrinkles in high-wear areas, such as the forehead and crow’s feet.
Alexa Plus explained: 9 things you need to know about Amazon’s new AI-powered assistant
So, it’s finally here – just over 10 years since Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant sparked a new (and ultimately underwhelming) age of voice assistants, it’s just been given a major AI brain transplant.
The new Alexa Plus is rolling out soon in the US, with international availability still unknown. But what exactly can Amazon’s new voice assistant do, and will it actually be worth the monthly subscription (or signing up to Amazon Prime) to get early access?
We’ve broken down everything you need to know about Alexa Plus below, from its pricing to new features and what this all means for classic Alexa. Strangely, Amazon didn’t announce any new Echo speakers at its big reveal today, but there was more than enough Alexa news for us to chew on – so let’s dive into Alexa’s biggest update since it first landed a decade ago…
1. It’s Alexa’s biggest ever upgrade
Since Alexa landed in 2014, we’ve seen the voice assistant get dozens of upgrades – from improvements to its listening powers to an ability to recognize individual voices. But it’s no overstatement to say that Alexa Plus is its biggest overhaul by far – it really is a reinvention of the voice assistant.
Powered by models from Anthropic (the maker of Claude) and Amazon’s own Nova, Alexa Plus has an ability to remember personal information and context. Broadly speaking, Amazon said we should think of the new Alexa as an orchestra conductor for our favorite services and devices – well, one that can play a mean tune using our private data, at least.
(Image credit: Amazon) As Amazon SVP of devices and services Panos Panay said: “The new Alexa knows almost every instrument in your life, your schedule, smart home, devices, and people you’re connected to, and brings them together into what is an incredible symphony.”
We’ll be the judges of that when we get to try it in the real world, but that won’t be too long a wait (in the US, at least)…
2. It works on (nearly) every Echo device
Judging by the early Alexa Plus demos, the best experience for the AI assistant will be on Amazon’s latest smart displays. That’s why the early access will be coming to the Echo Show 8, 10, 15 or 21 (whether you already own one, or buy one now).
But it is fortunately also backwards compatible with most Echos from the last decade, except the very early ones. The only devices Alexa Plus doesn’t work on are the Echo Dot 1st Gen, Echo 1st Gen, Echo Plus 1st Gen, Echo Tap, Echo Show 1st Gen, Echo Show 2nd Gen, and Echo Spot 1st Gen.
(Image credit: Amazon) You can also test-drive Alexa Plus in a web browser, the Alexa app and compatible Fire TV devices and Fire tablets. Unfortunately, Alexa Plus isn’t available on devices that are branded “Alexa Built-in” (like headphones and smartwatches), but Amazon said it’s hoping to bring the assistant to more devices “in the future”.
3. Alexa Plus is pricey, unless you’re on Prime
Alexa Plus will get an initial rollout in the US over the “next few weeks” and will cost $19.99 per month – or will be free if you have a Prime subscription. Considering Prime currently costs $14.99 a month (or $139 annually) in the US, that means there’s no reason not to get Prime. Which is clearly Amazon’s plan.
@techradar
♬ original sound – TechRadarWhile Alexa Plus will apparently work on almost every Alexa device so far, the initial rollout will be on the Echo Show 8, 10, 15, and 21 from next month. If you buy one of those smart displays now, you’ll get early access to Alexa Plus. Amazon sure does know how to trigger our impulse buy finger.
Sadly, there’s no news yet about an international rollout for Alexa Plus, but we’ll update this page as soon as we hear anything official.
4. It works with Ring cameras – and could upgrade your smart home
Amazon wants Alexa Plus to be the glue that gets you using more of its devices –particularly the ones built for your smart home.
If you have a Ring doorbell or security camera (plus a subscription), Alexa Plus can provide summaries of detected camera events and show you footage (for example, a package being delivered) on compatible Echo Show displays.
(Image credit: Amazon) It also integrates with Ring’s Smart Video Search, letting you ask natural questions like “did someone take out the garbage bins?” or “when was the last time the dog went out for a walk”? Hopefully, the answer won’t be “last week”.
But even if you only have an Echo Show or smart speaker, Alexa Plus promises to be a helpful (and much more conversational) voice assistant. You can move music from room to room (for example, “play the music upstairs”) or create new smart home Routines by voice without delving into an app.
If you have a Fire TV device, Alexa Plus will also play nicely with Prime Video – for example, letting you quickly jump to a particular scene that you’ve described.
5. Alexa Plus wants to run your home life
If you’re prepared to share private information with Alexa Plus, like calendars and documents, then it can also act a bit like a family assistant.
The calendar functionality certainly looks helpful – in a demo (below), Alexa was asked to recall the the dates of the presenter’s daughter’s soccer practices (from a previously shared document) and add the events to her calendar.
@techradar
♬ original sound – TechRadarThere’s seemingly no limit to the types of things you can upload, although it isn’t yet clear what the ceiling is on the amount of uploads (or info on where this is stored). Amazon says you can share emails, manuals, family recipes, study materials and more.
Clearly, the more you share, the more you’ll get out of Alexa Plus – and that’s going to be a personal decision for many. Some examples included asking how much oil you need for your grandma’s favorite zucchini bread, or simply “do I need to bring anything to the school fundraiser?” based on some emails you’ve shared.
6. It’s an upgrade for Kids Plus subscribers too
Amazon Echo speakers have become family favorites for many, so Amazon’s used Alexa Plus to upgrade its Kids Plus subscription offerings – the latter costs $5.99 / £4.99 a month separately, but you’ll get a one month free trial with Alexa Plus early access.
(Image credit: Amazon) Two features called “Stories with Alexa” and “Explore with Alexa” are designed to entertain your younglings and spark their creativity. A video showed a child chatting to Alexa and asking it questions – this was already possible on old-school Alexa, but the Plus version takes things up a notch with generative AI visuals and more.
Naturally, it’ll help if you have an Echo Show device with a screen, which is something that Amazon is using Alexa Plus to push us towards – if you buy a new Echo Show 8, 10, 15, or 21, you’ll get early access to its new voice assistant.
7. Alexa Plus remembers your preferences
One of the biggest upgrades with Alexa Plus – and something that could push more people towards a Prime subscription – is its ability to remember information and personalize its responses.
For example, it’ll be able to offer personalized news briefings based on your specific interests (gadgets, obviously). Its ability to understand and remember your family’s dietary preferences and allergies also sounds particularly handy if you like to use it for recipe suggestions and shopping.
@techradar
♬ original sound – TechRadarNot everything is built around voice interactions either. If you have an Echo Show smart display, you’ll also be able to track topics like deal alerts or a fresh drop of tickets for your favorite artists.
Inevitably, the more you share, the more functionality you’ll unlock – so it could be a case of finding that sweet spot between helpful features and privacy.
8. It’ll connect to a lot more services soon
This is clearly just the start of Amazon’s Alexa Plus ambitions – and the demos showed how much the tech giant wants it to plug into third-party services to make it your one-stop, conversational voice assistant.
For starters, the connectivity will be fairly simple, like plugging into OpenTable to make a dinner reservation or booking an Uber for you while texting your friend to let them know your ETA.
(Image credit: Amazon) But looking ahead, Amazon wants Alexa Plus to let you create and tweak grocery lists on the fly with natural conversation, have those lists automatically edited based on your dietary requirements, and integrate closely with the likes of Grubhub and Whole Foods.
In the not-too-distant future, Alexa Plus will also apparently work with specialized AI agents to help you life run smoothly in the background. We’ll see how that all works in practice, but Alexa Plus could clearly become a big player in the world of AI voice assistants.
9. It won’t replace classic Alexa (yet)
(Image credit: Amazon) Not everyone wants their voice assistant to get an AI brain transplant – and if all of this sounds a bit much, then the earlier version of Alexa will still be available on your older devices (for now, at least).
Amazon would rather you upgraded to Alexa Plus, of course. It says “we’re positive you’ll love all that Alexa+ has to offer”, but that “if you prefer using the original Alexa, it will remain available on your devices”.
That’s good news if you prefer the current version’s simpler functionality, but we’d say the clock is now ticking on that old-school version of Alexa…
You might also like
What is ARIA and how can it make UK tech competitive?
The Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) is a UK-based research and development funding agency established to catalyze transformative scientific and technological breakthroughs.
The success of the UK’s COVID response – exemplified by initiatives like the Vaccines Taskforce and Rapid Response Funds – has highlighted the importance of agile funding models. ARIA seeks to apply these lessons, operating as a flexible, independent body dedicated to high-risk, high-reward projects.
First announced in February 2021 and backed by a government investment of £800 million, the organization was inspired by the principles of the US Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), now known as Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Since the 1950s, DARPA has been instrumental in funding transformative technological advancements, including developing the Internet (ARPANET), GPS technology, and early voice recognition systems. Other countries, such as Japan and Germany, have since established similar bodies, such as Japan’s Moonshot R&D and Germany’s SPRIN-D.
Funding and project support
Traditional research funding in the UK has often been characterized by cautious investment strategies, prioritizing projects with predictable outcomes. ARIA seeks to disrupt this paradigm by providing the autonomy and resources necessary for researchers to pursue bold ideas without the constraints of conventional funding mechanisms.
Overall, ARIA operates with a budget of £800 million allocated over five years, from 2023 to 2028. The UK government provides this funding through the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). As an independent agency, ARIA can allocate these funds toward projects that align with its mission of unlocking significant scientific and technological advancements. This financial structure is designed to provide ARIA with the agility to respond swiftly to emerging opportunities and support projects that may not fit the traditional funding frameworks.
“Our funding terms are designed to encourage inventor-led startups and stimulate science entrepreneurship in the UK,” comments Antonia Jenkinson, chief finance and operating officer on the ARIA website.
The following core principles define ARIA’s approach:
- High-risk, high-reward research focus: ARIA exclusively supports projects that have the potential to create paradigm shifts in science and technology. While many funded projects may not succeed, those that do could profoundly impact society.
- Strategic and scientific autonomy: ARIA operates independently in selecting research programs, funding allocation, and institutional culture. Programme Directors have full discretion over the projects they support, with minimal government intervention.
- Empowering talented individuals: ARIA provides exceptional researchers and innovators the freedom to pursue their boldest ideas. Program directors are appointed based on their expertise and vision, allowing them to direct funding dynamically.
- Financial flexibility and operational freedom: ARIA is structured to minimize bureaucratic constraints and maximize efficiency. To encourage disruptive innovation, it employs various innovative funding mechanisms, including seed grants, equity stakes, and prize-based incentives.
The agency operates through two primary funding modes: programs and opportunity seeds. Programs are large-scale initiatives to advance complex ideas requiring coordinated investment across multiple disciplines and institutions, totalling between £50-80 million ($63-101 million). Program directors manage a portfolio of projects within these programs to drive significant breakthroughs.
Opportunity seeds of up to £500,000 ($631,700) support individual research teams exploring novel pathways that could inspire future programmes or evolve into standalone projects. This approach allows ARIA to fund diverse ideas and rapidly test their potential.
The agency does not retain intellectual property rights to the work it funds and generally does not require match funding. ARIA also does not take equity stakes in spinouts commercializing ARIA-funded IP. This approach is designed to encourage inventor-led UK startups and stimulate science entrepreneurship in the UK.
ARIA has identified several “opportunity spaces”—critically important but underexplored research areas ripe for breakthroughs. Each opportunity space is a foundation for multi-year programmes directed by the agency’s Programme Directors. Notable opportunity spaces include:
- Mathematics for safe AI: This program aims to develop technical solutions to ensure that powerful AI systems interact as intended with real-world systems and populations. It combines scientific models and mathematical proofs to achieve ethical AI that can transform the tech sector while preventing user harm.
- Nature computes better: This research explores redefining how computers process information by exploiting natural principles, potentially leading to dramatically more efficient computing systems.
- Smarter robot bodies: Focusing on creating robots capable of operating independently in complex and dynamic environments, this program aims to develop smarter robotic systems to reduce the burden of physical labour.
- Scalable neural interfaces: This area focuses on developing minimally invasive technologies to interface with the human brain at scale, aiming to transform our understanding and treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders.
- Programmable plants: By programming plants, this initiative seeks to address challenges like food insecurity, climate change, and environmental degradation, ensuring a sustainable biosphere for future generations.
Through these initiatives, ARIA actively funds projects that challenge existing assumptions, open new research paths, and strive toward transformative capabilities. The agency’s commitment to high-risk, high-reward research is designed to position the UK as a leader in scientific and technological innovation, with the potential to generate significant social and economic benefits.
Key ARIA personnel and relationships with public sector
ARIA’s leadership comprises individuals with diverse science, technology, and innovation expertise. Ilan Gur serves as the CEO at ARIA, bringing a wealth of experience from his previous roles, including his tenure as a Program Director at ARPA-E and as the founder of Activate, an organization supporting early-stage scientists in transforming research into viable products and businesses.
Antonia Jenkinson, chief finance and operating officer at ARIA, supports Gur and oversees ARIA’s financial and operational functions. The agency’s strategic direction is further guided by its board, which includes notable figures such as the entrepreneur and government advisor Matt Clifford, who oversaw the UK’s recently-published AI Opportunities Action Plan, as well as Nobel laureate David MacMillan and Kate Bingham, the former head of the UK’s Vaccine Taskforce.
Its advisors also include Demis Hassabis, the co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind. ARIA states that its board and advisors allow it to ground its high-risk, high-reward scientific exploration in diverse perspectives and expert-led governance.
ARIA operates as an independent public body under the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) sponsorship. While it has significant autonomy, the agency remains subject to national security oversight and financial transparency requirements, including an annual audit by the National Audit Office.
Unlike UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), which manages a broad research funding portfolio across multiple disciplines, ARIA focuses on a narrower range of projects. However, both agencies must collaborate to ensure alignment in the UK’s research ecosystem. ARIA’s distinct model allows it to take risks that traditional funding mechanisms cannot, complementing UKRI’s more structured approach.
Future development
ARIA represents a bold new approach to research funding in the UK, drawing inspiration from the world’s most successful innovation agencies. By embracing risk, minimizing bureaucracy, and providing top researchers with unprecedented autonomy, ARIA aims to unlock breakthrough discoveries that will shape the future of science, technology, and industry.
With an initial investment of £800 million and a leadership team committed to transformative research, ARIA has the potential to cement the UK’s status as a science superpower and drive economic growth through pioneering technological advancements.
In a world where technological advancements are accelerating, ARIA’s establishment reflects a strategic commitment to ensuring that the UK remains at the cutting edge of scientific discovery and innovation. By empowering researchers to pursue visionary projects, ARIA hopes to deliver breakthroughs that could have profound and lasting impacts on not just the tech sector but wider society.
Best free VPN for Android 2025: Which ones can you trust?
Free VPNs are no longer just for PCs. Android users can enjoy the same privacy protections on their devices, as well. Whether you want extra security while using a public Wi-Fi network, or to get around geo-locked content on your favorite streaming services, the right free VPN can help you do it without having to pay a cent.
The problem when looking for a good free VPN, though, is that there are a ton available on the Google Play Store and many aren’t trustworthy. So how do you determine which ones are worth your time? I’ve personally tested heaps of VPNs, both for PCs and Android devices, and have curated a list of the best free options you can feel confident in using. Check out my top picks below.
Why you should trust me: Here at PCWorld we’ve been testing computer hardware, software, and services since the 1980s. As the VPN reviewer, I’m continually testing all of the major VPNs on the market and many lesser-known services in order to curate a list of the very best VPNs across a variety of categories. Below you’ll find my favorite free VPNs, and below that, helpful advice about what to look for when choosing a VPN for your Android device on your own.
You can also check out my guide to the best VPNs covering multiple devices.
ProtonVPN – Best free VPN for Android
Pros
- Excellent free plan
- Great privacy tools
- Reliable and transparent no-logs policy
Price When Reviewed:
1 year: $59.88 ($4.99/mo) I 2 years: $107.76 ($4.49/mo)Why I like ProtonVPN
If you only have one device to worry about, ProtonVPN is your best choice. This free service provides what the company calls “medium speeds,” meaning you might not get access to the 10-gigabit-per-second servers that paying customers do, but the speeds are just fine anyways. It’s mercifully devoid of any annoying or privacy-compromising ads. Plus, there are no data or time limits imposed on users of the free version, meaning you can stream to your heart’s content — although they don’t promise that the free servers will unblock Netflix.
ProtonVPN has an excellent privacy policy as well, backed up by a recent independently verified no-logs audit. Overall, it’s an excellent free service with an easy-to-use Android app from a trustworthy company — what’s not to like?
Who should use ProtonVPN
ProtonVPN is a great option for anyone with a single Android device who needs a free VPN. Perfect for the one-off phone or tablet user, ProtonVPN provides unlimited data so it can be used all day without worrying about hitting a cap. Plus, privacy-conscious users can take heart that apart from the info required to sign up, ProtonVPN doesn’t collect any other user data.
Read our full
ProtonVPN review
PrivadoVPN – Best free VPN for Android runner-up
Pros
- Excellent free version
- Unblocks streaming services
- 10 simultaneous device connections
- Based in privacy-friendly Switzerland
Cons
- No independent audit
- Smaller server network
- Feature set not as robust as some competitors
Price When Reviewed:
$10.99Why I like PrivadoVPN
PrivadoVPN is a very strong overall service both with its premium and free versions. While I recommend either plan, it was the free version of the VPN that really stood out. With 13 global servers to choose from, a generous 10 simultaneous device-connection limit, and up to 10GB per month of high-speed data, you can’t really go wrong. In my testing I found that even the free servers were able to unblock streaming services — something that’s virtually unheard of with other free VPNs.
The only reason I rated Proton VPN slightly higher is because it offers a truly unlimited free version. Not to take away too much from PrivadoVPN, though, as it is about as close as you’re going to get otherwise. The 10GB-per-month data cap only applies to high-speeds, after you reach the cap you’ll still be able to use the free VPN but with throttled speeds.
Who should use PrivadoVPN
PrivadoVPN is a good option for just about any free VPN user. The decent amount of global servers to choose from and ability to unblock streaming services means you can use it to stream while traveling for free — just be careful as you’ll run up against that data limit quickly while streaming in HD. Users concerned with privacy should be aware that the company has not yet completed an independent audit, but it does have a no-logs policy.
Read our full
PrivadoVPN review
Windscribe Pro – Best for multiple devices
Pros
- Good free plan
- Fast speeds
- Unlimited device connections
Cons
- Streaming unblocking is inconsistent
- No independent audit
Price When Reviewed:
1 year: $69 ($5.75/mo) I Monthly: $9/moWhy I like Windscribe Pro
Another solid choice for Android users. You won’t get the unlimited data like you do with ProtonVPN, but it makes up for that with unlimited simultaneous device connections and solid overall speeds. Data is capped at up to 10GB per month, which means you can browse to your heart’s content, but likely won’t be able to use it for any streaming services.
The free service offers 10 regional connections including the U.S., Canada, UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Switzerland, Norway, and Romania. It also has a ton of privacy features such as blockers for site notifications and “we use cookies” banners, WebRTC leak protection, location spoofing, user agent rotation, and more.
The service is also extremely easy to use with a simple setup and solid performance for a free VPN. I not only recommend the Windscribe free service on its own, but also as an easy way to get to know the service before committing to a paid tier with premium features.
Who should use Windscribe Pro
Windscribe Pro’s free Android VPN is best suited for those who need access across multiple devices. Watch out for the data limit though, as you can hit it pretty fast while using multiple devices.
Read our full
Windscribe Pro review
Hide.me – Best for no sign-up requirement
Pros
- Good download speeds
- Easy-to-use Windows app
- No-logs promise
Cons
- Speeds were inconsistent in our tests
- Expensive single year subscription
Price When Reviewed:
$9.95 per month | $34.95 for 6 months | $59.95 for 27 monthsWhy I like Hide.me
Hide.me has pretty good speeds, and like Windscribe you’re limited to 10GB per month. Hide.me offers five connection choices including two U.S. locations (east and west), Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands. Hide.me doesn’t require an account for signing up, making it seamless and easy to use.
Who should use Hide.me
Since Hide.me’s free version does not require a sign-up in order to use, it’s good for those who just need a VPN for simple, one-off tasks. Alternatively, if you’re concerned about privacy, not having to enter in any personal information is a huge plus as well.
Read our full
Hide.me review
Speedify 10 – Best for switching between cellular and Wi-Fi
Pros
- Very good speeds
- Speedify’s failover feature seamlessly transitions between Wi-Fi and cellular networks
Cons
- Privacy policy says it collects some personal information
- Desktop mode for the Windows app needs work
Price When Reviewed:
$71.88Why I like Speedify
A solid VPN choice for anyone using the VPN on a phone. Speedify’s specialty is a seamless VPN transition between Wi-Fi and cellular. Typically, when you go between Wi-Fi and cellular the connection drops and restarts, but with Speedify it just keeps on going, which is nice. It also harnesses your Wi-Fi and cellular together to try and boost connection speeds.
Speeds are pretty good with Speedify, staying within the top 15 for speeds overall. The downside of this free offering is that you only get 2GB of data usage per month. That’s not much, which is why this is my last suggestion. But if you need something simple for basic web browsing Speedify is well worth a look.
Who should use Speedify
Due to the small data limit, Speedify is recommended for users who just need a VPN for basic web-browsing or a one-time use. The seamless transition between Wi-Fi and cellular and potential connection speed boost means that Speedify is an extremely convenient way to keep a VPN connection up while on the go or in spotty Wi-Fi areas.
Read our full
Speedify 10 review
AVG Secure – Best free trial
Pros
- 10 simultaneous device connections
Unblocks streaming services
Free 60-day trial
Cons
- Logs some user activity data
Not a lot of extra features
Long-term only subscription options
Price When Reviewed:
$53.88 per yearWhy I like AVG Secure VPN
It might sound odd to include a free-trial option here, but AVG Secure VPN is a fine VPN service on its own and it provides a 60-day free trial for new users. That’s incredibly generous for a premium service — most other VPNs only offer one-week free trials at best. The free trial extends to all devices as well so you can use it on both your Windows machine as well as your Android device.
AVG is a household name in security software and its VPN lives up to its high-standards. The free-trial gives you complete access to all of the paid features such as 10 simultaneous device connections, over 700 servers across more than 50 countries, and guaranteed streaming service unblocking with specific servers. While the speeds aren’t the fastest I’ve ever seen, they’re good enough for most general online activities. All-in-all, two months for free of AVG Secure VPN is a fantastic deal, just don’t forget to cancel the subscription before the free trial runs out.
Who should use AVG Secure VPN
Most people looking for a free VPN for shorter-term use will stand to gain a lot from AVG Secure VPN’s free trial. But I think it’s an exceptional choice in particular for those who are traveling for awhile and need a VPN while abroad. By taking advantage of a premium service’s speeds and broad server network you can access all of your streaming content no matter what country you find yourself in and you shouldn’t have to worry about frustrating data caps from other free services. Stream and browse to your heart’s content for no cost, well, at least for 60 days.
Read our full
AVG Secure review
What to look for in a free VPN for Android
This will follow a lot of the advice I’ve already given for free stuff when it comes to Android. Google is doing a better job than ever at keeping harmful apps out of the Play Store, but there is still a chance of some random VPN app having malicious intent. Another problem is that even if the app is fine, the service itself may be up to no good.
For those reasons I always advise going with a well-known VPN service provider to reduce your chances of running into security issues.
Next, you want a free app that is truly free. Not some 7- or 30-day trial that will automatically start charging the card connected to your Play account after the trial period. You should also read over the privacy policy to make sure there’s nothing there you’re going to have a problem with.
Finally, you want to make sure the VPN has data limits that suit your needs.
How I tested
I judge VPNs on a variety of criteria including server network, connection speeds, privacy protections, ease-of-use, additional features, and cost. For a more detailed guide on how I test, check out PCWorld’s comprehensive guide on how we test VPN services.
Speed tests are kept as simple as possible. I average the connections between different global locations for any given VPN and then compare them to a baseline internet speed to get a good picture of the overall connection speeds. I thoroughly research and analyze the privacy policies and histories of each VPN and note any outstanding discrepancies or data collection issues.
Experience and ease-of-use are subjective, but I try my best to give an accurate representation of how it feels to work with the VPN. Since you don’t have to pay for a free VPN, the value will be contingent upon the trade-offs you’ll need to make and the restrictions it has in place.
Free VPNs aren’t a top recommendation, but if you’re going to go that way I’d strongly suggest the VPNs mentioned above.
Other VPN reviews and features
FAQ
1.What is a VPN?
A VPN, or virtual private network, hides your identity and encrypts your traffic while browsing the internet. Also, VPN servers are located all across the world, allowing you to connect to a server in another country. So if you want to access location-restricted content like streaming services, you can connect to the appropriate country’s server and gain access to content that may have been locked in your area.
2.How does a VPN work?
In short, a VPN hides your IP address by redirecting your web traffic through a remote server hosted by the VPN company. The VPN server then appears to be the source of your traffic instead of your actual location. These remote servers can be located both in different countries around the world or even in your own country. Additionally, your network traffic is encrypted from your computer to the VPN, which adds an extra layer of security.
While connected to a VPN and browsing the internet, the VPN acts as a middleman between you and a website. If your computer sends a request to the VPN, it will then pass it along to a website. In return, the website sends its response back to the VPN, which forwards it via a secure encrypted connection to your computer.
3.Is it legal to use a VPN?
In the United States as well as most countries, using a VPN is perfectly legal. Some certain websites try to block VPN connections, but that is dependent upon their own terms of usage. It is important to know that while using a VPN is legal, some of the activities done while using a VPN can still be illegal. Activities such as downloading pirated copyrighted content or accessing dark web markets are both illegal with and without a VPN.
4.Are there differences between Windows VPN apps and an Android VPN apps?
Usually the core functionality of one service’s VPN remains the same between its Windows and Android apps. That being said, oftentimes there are differences between the two in regards to the features offered and user experience.
For example, features common in Windows apps such as multi-hop, kill-switch functionality, and custom DNS configuration may not always be available in the same service’s Android app. While features such split tunneling and IKEv2 protocol support may only be available on Android. This usually comes down to compatibility issues and developer resources. Additionally, you’re likely to find differences in the interface and overall user experience between apps on the two operating systems. Often the Windows app will display more information, which is then omitted from the Android app due to screen size restrictions.
Again, this shouldn’t affect the core functionality of the VPN with either app, meaning that users can choose the version that best suits their needs based on their own usage requirements and device preferences.
Corsair Titan 360 RX RGB AIO review: Excellent for iCue
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.Today we’re looking at Corsair’s latest AIO, the iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB. Most users interested in this AIO will be interested in it due to its compatibility with the iCUE ecosystem, which allows for a ton of customization options – including cooler upgrades like optional VRM fan modules or even adding a fancy LCD screen. In common scenarios, this cooler has some of the lowest noise levels I’ve seen thus far – but it isn’t without flaws, as I’ll detail below
Will this AIO make our list of Best CPU Coolers? Let’s take a look at the specifications and features of the Titan RX RGB AIO, then we’ll go over thermal performance and noise levels.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) Cooler specifications
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCooler
Corsair iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB
MSRP
$199 USD
Radiator Material
Aluminum
Pump Speed
Up to ~3000 RPM
Lighting
iCUE Link for CPU Block and fans
Warranty
6 Years
Socket Compatibility
Intel Socket LGA 1851/1700 AMD AM5 / AM4
Unit Dimensions (including fans)
396 (L) x 120 (W) x 52mm (D)
Base
Copper cold plate
Maximum TDP (Our Testing)
>265W with Intel’s i7-14700K
Packing and included contents
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) The packaging for Corsair’s AIO is relatively standard, not much different from the average AIO. The product is secured with plastic wrappings and molded cardboard, and the fans are preinstalled for user convenience.
Included with the box are the following:
- Three pre-installed 120mm fans
- 360mm radiator and CPU block
- Pre-installed Thermal Paste
- iCUE Link Hub
- Mounting accessories for modern AMD & Intel platforms
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) Features of Corsair’s iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB
*️⃣Pre-installed Thermal Paste
Corsair only includes pre-installed thermal paste, sufficient for a single installation. This will be useful for most users, but the downside is that you’ll need to purchase additional thermal paste if you ever want to move the cooler to a new system or swap in a new CPU.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) *️⃣27mm Radiator
The iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB includes a radiator 27mm in size, which is standard for most liquid coolers.
*️⃣Upgrade Options
One thing that sets the iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB apart is the ability to upgrade the AIO with different options that mount on top of the cold plate. These optional upgrades are cheapest if you purchase the AIO directly from Corsair and customize the features during the checkout process.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) The module I find most interesting is the VRM fan upgrade, which costs an additional $30 if you purchase it after already owning the AIO – but only $15 if you purchase it with the AIO.
Another upgrade option is a 2.1-inch, 480×480 IPS display which allows you to view real-time CPU temperatures, animated GIFs, movie files, and more. However, I find it hard to recommend as an aftermarket purchase due to its high price of $100 USD.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) The last upgrade option available is a simpler “Groove” module, which changes the RGB aesthetic for only $15.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) *️⃣iCUE Ecosystem
The Titan RX 360 RX RGB is controlled by an iCUE hub, pictured below. This allows you to take advantage of the iCUE ecosystem.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) There’s a lot of options and customization available with Corsair’s iCUE Link system, which is designed to simplify PC building and cable routing, while adding some interesting lighting effects.
One disadvantage of the iCUE Link hub is that it has higher power requirements than a simple USB connection can provide – you’ll need an extra 6-pin PCI-e GPU power connection to power it on.
*️⃣Corsair RX Series 120mm fans
There’s more to a cooler than just the heatsink or radiator. The bundled fans have a significant impact on cooling and noise levels, as well as how the cooler looks in your case. The fans included here aren’t PWM and require using an iCUE Hub to control. However, as the benchmarks will show, they enable strong cooling performance, both at full speed and when restricted to low noise levels!
These fans are pre-installed and feature a quick-connect system, designed to save the user time and offer tidy cable management.
Swipe to scroll horizontallyDimensions
120 x 120 x 25mm
Fan Speed
300-2100 RPM
Air Flow
Up to 73.5 CFM
Air Pressure
Up to 4.33 mmH2O
Bearing Type
Magnetic Dome
Lighting
iCUE
*️⃣Full RAM Compatibility
Like almost every other AIO on the market, Corsair’s AIO doesn’t interfere with or overhang RAM DIMMs in any manner, allowing for use of all sizes of RAM, no matter how tall.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) *️⃣Six-year warranty
Most AIOs on the market have a limited warranty of only 1-3 years. Corsair goes the extra mile with a six-year warranty for the Titan 360 RX RGB. This generous warranty almost negates the high price of this AIO – almost.
Things I didn’t like about this AIO
There are two primary things I didn’t like about this AIO, and one minor complaint that is subjective.
❌ First, the iCUe software didn’t always save my custom cooling settings. On multiple occasions when I rebooted my computer, I’d have to manually configure them. Sometimes, my presets wouldn’t save at all. Enabling the “device memory mode” in the iCUE software prevents this problem from occurring entirely, but users shouldn’t have to take this extra step.
❌ The second thing I don’t like about this AIO is that it has higher power consumption compared to competitors. You need an extra 6-pin PCIe GPU power connection to power the hub and cooler. Even if you don’t care about some extra power consumption, this is inconvenient when modern GPUs often require whatever PCIe plugs your PSU has to offer.
❌ The last thing I don’t like about Corsair’s iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB is that by default, pump and fan speeds are tied to the temperature of the liquid coolant. But this is a personal preference, you might actually prefer this type of operation. This has the advantage of avoiding fan bursts and delivering lower maximum noise levels.
❌ The primary disadvantage is that this design allows the CPU to reach its peak temperature and throttle during intensive workloads. The other disadvantage is that fans will remain at higher noise levels even after a workload has ended – because it is harder / slower to cool the temperature of the liquid coolant down than it is to cool the temperature of the CPU down.
Testing configuration – Intel LGA1700 and LGA1851 platform
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCPU
Intel Core i7-14700K
GPU
ASRock Steel Legend Radeon 7900 GRE
Motherboard
MSI Z790 Project Zero
Case
MSI Pano 100L PZ Black
System Fans
Iceberg Thermal IceGale Silent
There are many factors other than the CPU cooler that can influence your cooling performance, including the case you use and the fans installed in it. A system’s motherboard can also influence this, especially if it suffers from bending, which results in poor cooler contact with the CPU.
In order to prevent bending from impacting our cooling results, we’ve installed Thermalright’s LGA 1700 contact frame into our testing rig. If your motherboard is affected by bending, your thermal results will be worse than those shown below. Not all motherboards are affected equally by this issue. I tested Raptor Lake CPUs in two motherboards. And while one of them showed significant thermal improvements after installing Thermalright’s LGA1700 contact frame, the other motherboard showed no difference in temperatures whatsoever! Check out our review of the contact frame for more information.
I’ve also tested this cooler with Intel’s latest platform, Arrow Lake and LGA 1851.
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCPU
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
GPU
MSI Ventus 3X RTX 4070Ti Super
Motherboard
MSI Z890 Carbon Wifi
Case
MSI MPG Gungnir 300R
System fans
Pre-installed case fans
LGA 1700 and 1851 Installation
The installation of the AIO is simple. The following steps assume that you will mount the radiator to your case first, which is generally a good idea unless your case is very small.
1. You’ll first need to place the backplate against the rear of the motherboard. The backplate included is simple, and only really designed for a single installation. It uses adhesive strips around the rubber standoffs. This has the advantage of making the first installation easy, but it doesn’t adhere very well on additional installations – requiring that the user hold the backplate while attempting to complete the other installation steps.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) 2. Next, take the CPU block and place it on top of the CPU. Use the screws pre-attached to secure the CPU block.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) 3. The next step will be to install the iCUE hub, connect it to a 6-pin PCI-e power cable, and then connect cables from the hub to the CPU block and radiator.
4. Now you can power on your computer, as installation is complete.
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware) Why TV speakers suck and is Panasonic leaving the US again? | You Asked
On today’s You Asked: Why do TV speakers suck — and why even bother putting speakers in TVs? Why don’t TVs get five HDMI ports? Will Panasonic abandon the US again, and should you even buy one of their TVs?
Why do TV speakers suck? (Can we axe them?)
Zeke Jones / Digital Trends Mike writes: Why on earth, in 2025, do TVs still insist on wasting space with built-in, inadequate speakers? I can understand lower budget/entry-level TVs, but if people are spending $2,000+, are they likely using an AVR or soundbar? I’d think the added real estate and the cost savings would entice the TV makers to drop the speakers in their higher-end TVs. Plus, they could push their own brand of crappy soundbars. Thanks!
First off, not all soundbars are crappy. However, I do understand your point. To address this whole speakers-in-TVs issue, let’s talk about TV tuners.
Did you know that in 2016 and 2017 TV brand Vizio removed over-the-air tuners from its M series and P series TVs? This move meant they weren’t allowed to call them “TVs.” In the US, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) requires that to be called a television, a display must have an over-the-air tuner. Vizio had to market them as monitors or home theater displays.
Vizio may have thought at the time, Everything is going to streaming now and many of our customers will likely never use a tuner, and besides, you can stream a lot of live TV now, too. Soon, folks won’t even need an antenna, so why not stand out by going in a new direction and omit the tuner?
Dan Baker / Digital Trends If this was Vizio’s thinking at the time, it seems a bit like an Apple move, right? Apple is all: We’re removing the headphone jack from our phones because who uses wired headphones anymore? Everything’s going wireless. We have to be bold. We have to have the “courage” to do this.
Except Vizio wasn’t Apple, and the consumer reaction to the tuner being removed was not warmly received (which is an understatement). Vizio ended up walking back that decision. Some could argue that was the beginning of the brand’s decline from a once strong market position. The lesson here: Don’t make Apple moves unless you have Apple money and Apple power.
Some of us can’t imagine having a high performance or high-end expensive TV without a similarly premium audio system to go with it — we see the speakers built into the TV as completely unnecessary. However, a reminder: Folks who feel this way are very much in the minority. TV manufacturers actually pay attention to feedback from their customers, especially when that feedback indicates that a decision resulted in lost revenue. They likely know that if they did not include speakers in their TVs, the backlash would be uproarious, and companies can’t afford that kind of negative PR. The Vizio situation is likely regarded as a stark example of “what not to do.”
Beyond that, there’s not much to be gained by not putting speakers in a TV. It wouldn’t lower costs significantly or make the TV noticeably slimmer. There’s really no upside. Omitting speakers is a high-risk gamble that would not pay meaningful dividends.
If a TV brand had the same amount of market-shifting power and control as Apple, I suppose they could force people to get supplemental audio systems. Yet, even if they had that kind of power (and they wouldn’t), it’s the kind of bold move that could sink a brand. So, I don’t see it happening anytime soon.
Which brings us to the question: Why do TV speakers tend to suck? TV manufacturers may have to put speakers in a TV, but that doesn’t mean they are motivated to make them great. The speakers need to be just good enough to not piss people off. There’s a big difference between not having something at all and having something that is disappointing but ancillary to the primary function of the device: the picture.
Also, consumer obsession over increasingly thin TVs forced manufacturers to come up with audio solutions that fit in very little space. However, transducers by their very nature need some space to sound good. It also helps if they are firing at your ears, as opposed to down at the floor. As manufacturers put weaker and weaker audio systems in their TVs that continued to sell well, they learned that customers would accept paltry audio systems if the TV on the whole was good enough.
There are some exceptions to this rule. Some extremely high-end TVs from Hisense, TCL, Sony, and Panasonic include premium audio systems. Sometimes that effort works well, and sometimes it doesn’t.
Zeke Jones / Digital Trends A good audio system does add some cost and complexity to a TV, and in some cases it can even be a bit of a gamble — specifically, the Panasonic Z95A, which basically has a built-in soundbar strip at the bottom of the TV. It sounds great, but some folks don’t love how it looks. It reminds me of when Sony built speaker strips onto the left and right side of some TV models. It sounded pretty good, but folks disliked the look, and Sony swiftly discontinued the practice.
There isn’t a lot of motivation to outfit a television with a premium audio solution, but there’s also a lot of risk involved in not including one at all. It makes sense to take that good-enough approach and leave it at that.
More HDMI ports, please
Zeke Jones / Digital Trends Dionicio writes: With the high number of devices we’re able to connect to our TVs, is there any reason why TV manufacturers do not simply add a fifth HDMI port?
This is a really interesting question. As part of my answer, I remind folks that, as enthusiasts, we may assume our personal needs or wants are similar to those of the greater public. However, that’s just not the case.
Anecdotally, I can tell you that many folks don’t connect anything to their TVs — other than a soundbar, perhaps. The surge in streaming popularity and the convenience of built-in streaming platforms makes it easy to buy a TV and not require another device. Cable and satellite subscribers are dwindling at a faster rate than ever, so those cable and satellite boxes are taking up fewer HDMI ports on TVs. Also, disc players and disc sales are on a steep decline (much to my chagrin).
Digital Trends Game consoles are super popular, and most households have just one — and not two, three, or four. Increasingly, more people need just a single HDMI port and a huge chunk of the public don’t even use the three or four HDMI ports they have.
This is why we don’t see more TVs from brands like Sony, Panasonic, TCL, and Hisense including four HDMI 2.1 ports – the need doesn’t exist at a high enough scale for companies like MediaTek, which makes the System on Chip (SoC) that brands use in their TVs.From a business decision perspective, I think we’re more likely to see four HDMI 2.1 ports from MediaTek before we see five HDMI ports. Also, this would require a complete redesign of the existing boards to accommodate the space, and that one decision would set off a flurry of TV redesigns. Even small changes at scale take a lot of work.
As enthusiasts, it’s easy to assume everyone else feels similarly and has the same needs and wants as we do. In the same way that most folks don’t even want a desktop computer — let alone one with a $2,000 graphics card — most folks don’t require five HDMI ports. So, we’re forced to use A/V receivers or external HDMI switchers to fill our niche needs. (I like that, though. It costs a bit of money, but that’s what this hobby requires.)
Take a pause on Panasonic?
Digital Trends Patrick writes: I’m still really considering the Z95B. Does the recent news about Panasonic necessarily make this one to avoid? Would FireTV updates come from Amazon?
As many TV enthusiasts already know, there is some worry that Panasonic could end up selling off its TV division in about a year or so. This comes from Panasonic Holdings Company President Yuki Kusumi, who made that statement during an online press conference on February 4. Naturally, with the future of Panasonic’s TV business in question, some are wondering whether it is smart to buy a Panasonic TV.
My answer: Yes, I think it is safe to buy a Panasonic TV, and for two reasons — one is practically and analytically based and one is more personal (and optimistic). However, I obviously don’t have a crystal ball, so don’t come at me if you buy a Panasonic TV and then Panasonic exits the US market in a year.
Zeke Jones / Digital Trends Not only do we lack a crystal ball, we don’t have adequate insight into the motivation behind Kusumi’s statement. It is possible he needs it known that he is a smart, practical businessman who is looking at all options that will help ensure the long-term health of Panasonic’s business holdings, which, by the way, are vast. Simply acknowledging that something is under consideration can give shareholders enough confidence to prevent them from bailing out, further threatening the company’s financial viability.
There’s no guarantee that a sale is inevitable, and I don’t think we have enough information to read this as “Panasonic TV is on the ropes.” At least I hope not.
I do think that Panasonic’s re-entry into the US market is a sign that the brand believes that if it is successful at regaining part of the US TV market share, it will help strengthen its TV division overall. Given how much it took to make that happen, I take it as a sign that there’s more optimism than pessimism around their TV business right now.
One way to help ensure Panasonic’s TVs continue being true Panasonic TVs — and not just another brand licensed out to some other manufacturer — is to buy Panasonic TVs. They are excellent TVs. I think it is safe to purchase one even if Panasonic sells off its TV division, and, in a possible worst-case scenario, stops sending out firmware updates. The TVs are good enough that they won’t need a ton of firmware updates, and any updates to streaming apps will be on the Amazon side. The TV should still be viable for many years.
Zeke Jones / Digital Trends If we still have die-hard fans of Pioneer Kuro and Panasonic plasmas out there happily rocking their TVs, a Panasonic TV purchased today is going to hold up well — at least as well as, if not better than, most TVs produced today. The replacement cycle of TVs is now much shorter than it used to be, but relative to that replacement cycle, I think a Panasonic TV purchase now is as safe as it gets.
On a personal note, I hope that Panasonic’s TV business can stay healthy and see consistent growth in the US market. Competition in this space is a good thing for consumers. On a more practical note, I don’t think we have enough information to be forecasting doom and gloom for Panasonic TVs — not yet, anyway. We’re seeing the kind of headlines that get clicks — and there’s some merit to the concern — but I think it’s far too early to be forecasting demise.
That statement may not age well. I could be wrong. But right now, the way things are going in this world? I am choosing optimism and hard work over pessimism and surrender.
DJI Flip review: A unique and useful creator drone with a few flaws
After creating a stir with the $200 Neo, DJI is back at it with another innovative drone, the Flip. It has a first-of-a-kind folding design and shrouded propellers to keep people safe. It also integrates 3D infrared obstacle detection to track subjects and has a long list of impressive features.
With a camera borrowed from the Mini 4 Pro, the Flip can take high-quality 4K 60p video indoors or out with little risk. It comes with vlogger-friendly features like Direction Track and Quickshots for social media. And it can be flown with either DJI’s controllers, a smartphone, voice control or the push of a button.
There’s no need for a permit to fly it, and best of all, it’s priced at $439 with an RC-N3 controller included — making it one of the more affordable drones available. To see how well it serves creators, I flew it inside a castle, a 500-year-old house and out in nature. It’s not perfect (hello, stiff winds and obstacles), and it has some stiff competition with the HoverAir X1 Pro, but it’s one of the most useful creator drones yet.
Design
The Flip has a clever, user-friendly design. All four propellers fold down and stack below the body like some kind of Star Wars spacecraft. DJI chose this construction so that it could incorporate permanent (rather than detachable) shrouds that protect the props to limit damage or injury in case of a collision. The design also employs large propellers that aid performance and reduce noise. By comparison, DJI’s Neo has tiny, fast-spinning propellers that make a high-pitched shrieking noise.
DJI kept the takeoff weight including battery and microSD card under 250 grams by using carbon fiber and other lightweight materials. This means the Flip can be flown without special permits. It’s still rather bulky though, especially compared to the sleek HoverAir X1 Pro.
The Flip has far better battery life than its rival, however. DJI promises up to 34 minutes max flight time (about 27 minutes in real-world conditions), compared to just 16 minutes for the X1 Pro. The batteries can be charged up quickly as well, taking about 35 minutes each with the optional four-battery charger. You’ll need a memory card, though, as the Flip only has 2GB of internal storage.
The Flip is DJI’s first lightweight drone with a 3D infrared sensor for forward obstacle avoidance and it also has a downward vision sensor for landing spot detection and stability. However, unlike the Mini 4 Pro and other DJI drones, it has no side or rear obstacle sensors.
One small issue is that the Flip’s propellers don’t have much clearance, so they can snag even in short grass on takeoffs. Like the Neo, though, it’s designed more for takeoffs and landings from your hand. To that end, it has a button on the opposite side of the power switch to select a flight mode and takeoff automatically, just like the Neo. It can also be flown with the app, voice control or manually with a controller — either the DJI RC-N3 controller (which requires a smartphone) or the RC 2 controller with a built-in 5.5-inch display.
Features and performance
Steve Dent for EngadgetThe Flip can hum along at up to 26 mph in sport mode, which isn’t bad for a light drone, but a good bit slower than the Mini 4 Pro (37 mph). However, the reduced weight and large surface area means it’s not the best in high winds. When it flew over the roof of a castle, for example, it got hit by a gust that pushed it nearly backwards.
However, the Flip can do things that you’d never attempt with a Mini 4 Pro. The full propeller protection, stability and relatively low noise make it well-suited for flying inside large rooms full of fragile objects and people. That, along with the excellent picture quality, means it’s a great choice for event professionals and content creators working in public spaces.
It’s also perfect for beginners, because like the Neo, you can launch the Flip off your hand at the push of a button. It will then fly a pre-programmed mode and land back where it started. One of those modes, Direction Track, allows the drone to fly backwards and follow you for vlogging. There’s also a follow mode for activities like running and hiking, along with social media-friendly flight modes like Dronie, Rocket, Circle, Helix and Boomerang. Note that video in these automatic modes is limited to 4K 30 fps.
At the same time, the Flip is easy to fly manually either with a smartphone or the supported controllers. Though not as maneuverable as the Mini 4 Pro, it’s easier for novices to fly and makes a stable camera platform. You do need to be careful in areas with untextured floors (painted concrete, for instance), as it can throw off the Flip’s sensors and make it unstable. When that happens, your best bet is to switch it into sport mode to disable the vision-based flight stability sensors (and then fly carefully because obstacle detection will also be disabled).
Steve Dent for EngadgetOddly, the Flip doesn’t work with DJI’s Goggles N3 and Motion 3 controller, unlike the much cheaper Neo. That’s because DJI sees it predominantly as a camera drone rather than an acrobatic device.
If you’re hoping to use the Flip to track yourself or others, there’s a big issue: It lacks obstacle detection in any direction except forward or down. If you’re flying the drone backwards, for instance, you have to make sure there’s nothing behind it can crash into. And automatic obstacle avoidance doesn’t work at all when you use the Flip’s smart features like Direction Track or ActiveTrack, though the drone will stop 10 feet before hitting anything it detects. The lack of that feature is odd, since obstacle avoidance is an important part of subject tracking, and DJI didn’t say if it had plans to rectify that issue via a future update. None of this is an issue with the HoverAir X1 Pro, which can track forwards, backwards and even sideways with full obstacle detection enabled.
The Flip has excellent range for such a tiny drone at up to eight miles, thanks to DJI’s O4 transmission system. At the same time, it can send a high quality 1080p 60 fps video signal that can be recorded to the controller as a backup. However, if you’re flying using your smartphone with a Wi-Fi connection, range is limited to just 165 feet.
Camera
Samuel Dejours for EngadgetThe cameras are the biggest difference between the Flip and the Neo. The Flip comes with a much larger 1/1.3-inch 48-megapixel sensor and a 24mm-equivalent wide angle F/1.7 lens. It’s the same as the one on the Mini 4 Pro and provides sharp, noise-free video in good light.
You can shoot 4K video at up to 60 fps (100 fps in slow-mo mode), rather than just 30 fps like the Neo. In addition, the Flip supports 10-bit D-LogM video that allows for improved dynamic range in bright lighting, like on ski slopes. You can also capture 12MP or 48MP RAW (DNG) photos.
Video quality is noticeably sharper than on the Neo and the Flip is a far better drone for night shoots or dimly lit indoor settings thanks to the lower noise levels. Though the DJI Air 3S and Mavic 4 offer higher quality due to the larger sensors, there isn’t a large difference in good light. Since the Flip has just a single camera, video is noticeably more noisy when using the 2x zoom. Note that when shooting in the automated modes (Direction Track, Dronie, etc.) there is no manual control of the camera to adjust exposure, shutter speed and ISO.
The HoverAir X1 Pro has the same-sized 1/1.3-inch sensor and offers very similar video quality (with a log mode as well), though I find DJI’s colors to be a touch more accurate. The HoverAir has slightly inferior 4K 60p video unless you spend an extra $200 for the Pro Max version to get 8K 30fps and 4K 120fps.
With a three-axis gimbal, the Flip shoots silky smooth video even if it’s being buffeted by winds. You can choose Follow mode to keep the camera level even when the drone banks, or FPV mode that allows the camera to tilt for a more exciting first-person perspective. Generally, video remains smooth even with sudden maneuvers, while footage from the HoverAir X1 Pro exhibits occasional jolts and janky movements.
The Flip’s camera doesn’t rotate 90 degrees like the one on the Mini 4 Pro, so maximum resolution for vertical video is 2.7K — a step backwards from the 4K 60 fps 9:16 vertical video on the Mini 4 Pro.
Wrap-up
Steve Dent for EngadgetThe Flip represents a bold change in direction (and design) for DJI. Unlike open prop drones, it gives creators the ability to shoot indoors and around people with relatively high video quality. And it does this for just $439 — much less than the $759 Mini 4 Pro. However, the Flip isn’t perfect, with its main flaws being the reduced maneuverability, problems in wind and lack of obstacle avoidance when using smart modes like ActiveTrack.
As I mentioned, DJI also has some serious competition in this category, namely the $500 HoverAir X1 Pro. Both offer features like palm takeoff, intelligent flight modes and subject tracking and have similar quality, but the HoverAir X1 Pro offers rear-side active collision detection, a wider lens and more internal storage. It’s also about half the size of the Flip. For its part, the Flip has double the flight time and a much longer transmission range.
The choice then depends on what you want. If portability, subject tracking and obstacle avoidance are key, the HoverAir X1 Pro is a better option. Others who prioritize battery life, smoother video and a more established company should choose the Flip. In any case, DJI usually dominates all drone categories, so it’s nice to see multiple products facing off in this creator-centric space.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/dji-flip-review-a-unique-and-useful-creator-drone-with-a-few-flaws-181507462.html?src=rss