Tag: latest tech innovations

  • Moto G Power 2025: It’s OK to stick with last year’s model

    Moto G Power 2025: It’s OK to stick with last year’s model


    Motorola’s 2025 update to the Moto G Power ($299.99) is about as minor a refresh as you can get. The phone has a slightly larger screen and a more comprehensive waterproof rating—and that’s about it. The carried-over cameras are average at best, and, puzzlingly, the new processor produces worse performance than the 2024 model. Ultimately, we prefer the better battery life, sharper cameras, and longer support window of the $299.99 Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, which is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable phones.


    Design: It Looks More Expensive That It Is

    The Moto G Power looks like a premium phone despite its low price. It features the same stylish rounded corners and thin bezels found on most modern phones, and the vegan leather back is soft to the touch and looks sophisticated right out of the box. It measures 6.56 by 3.04 by 0.34 inches (HWD) and weighs 7.34 ounces, which is bigger and heavier than the 2024 version (6.47 by 2.95 by 0.32 inches, 6.84 ounces), while the Samsung Galaxy A25 (6.34 by 3.01 by 0.33 inches, 6.95 ounces) is marginally shorter and lighter.

    Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. See how we test.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) back

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The Moto G Power comes in two colors: Leaf Green or Slate Gray. The Slate Gray version is featured in this review. While the vegan leather back is easy to grip and appealing to look at, it does have a major problem: It’s a dirt, dust, and debris magnet. It picks up any small particles it comes in contact with and holds onto them for dear life. Within five minutes of unboxing it, I noticed hair and dust attached to the phone’s rear cover. I tried to wipe it away but to no avail. Eventually, I had to use a damp paper towel to clean it effectively. This phone demands a case just to keep it clean—which somewhat negates Motorola’s efforts to make it look and feel nice. 

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) ports

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The same material also covers the three-camera array, so while the bump may look pleasing, it’s destined to attract unwanted debris. 

    The combined SIM card/microSD tray is on the left side of the phone, while the volume rocker and power button are on the right. The buttons feel high-end and make a satisfying click when pressed. The bottom edge of the phone has a 3.5mm headphone jack, a USB-C port for charging, and a speaker grille. A small, circular cutout for the selfie camera sits at the top of the display.  

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) cameras

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The power button has a built-in fingerprint scanner, or you can use the selfie camera for facial recognition. I found the fingerprint scanner slower than I would have liked, but facial recognition worked well. Keep in mind that the fingerprint reader is more secure. 

    One of the phone’s biggest improvements is a more robust IP rating to protect it against dust and water. The phone has an IP68/IP69 rating, which means it can withstand immersion in about five feet of fresh water for up to 30 minutes. It can also withstand high-pressure water jets at high temperatures. Most phones in this price range—including the Galaxy A25—lack an IP rating altogether.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) power and volume buttons

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)


    Display: Not Bad for the Price

    The Moto G Power has a 6.8-inch display, up from the 6.7-inch screen on last year’s model, and a similar resolution of 2,388 by 1,080 pixels. It also carries over the 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, which is great for gaming. The phone’s display is clear and bright. It struggled under direct sunlight in testing, but I had no problems watching videos in most lighting conditions.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) in hand

    (Credit: Sarah Lord )

    For comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 has a slightly sharper 6.5-inch display (2,340 by 1,080, which has more pixels per inch because it’s smaller) with a refresh rate of 120Hz. 


    Performance: Not as Powerful as Last Year’s Model

    Like the 2024 Moto G Power, the 2025 edition comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, though you can expand that up to 1TB via the microSD slot. This year, the phone runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor. While it’s newer than the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 found on the 2024 model, it’s a step down in processor class and not as powerful.

    Everyday tasks like opening apps and navigating around the user interface feel identical to the 2024 model, but benchmark testing reveals slower performance across the board. 

    Motorola Moto G Power (2024) benchmarks

    (Credit: Geekbench/GFXBench/PCMag)

    We use Geekbench 6 to test CPU performance and the Moto G Power scored 795 on the single-core test and 2,095 on the multi-core test. This is a notable drop from the 889 and 2,345 results from the 2024 model. The Galaxy A25 (which is powered by a Exynos 1280) did much better in the single-core test (964) and similarly in the multi-core test (2,058).

    Graphics performance is also not as good. In the GFXBench Aztec Ruins gaming test, it ran at 6.4 frames per second (fps) compared with the 2024 model’s 7.2fps and the Galaxy A25’s 10fps.

    You can still play graphics-intensive games on the Moto G Power, but they don’t perform particularly well. I was able to load Genshin Impact, though it stuttered quite a bit during gameplay, especially in combat-heavy situations. Casual games like Alto’s Odyssey play better. 


    Battery Life: Reliable, But Not a Standout

    The Moto G Power carries over the 5,000mAh battery from its predecessor. To test it, I played a YouTube video on loop over Wi-Fi at full-screen brightness. The 2025 model lasted 12 hours and 15 minutes on a single charge—exactly the same as its predecessor. The Galaxy A25 outlasted it with a battery life of 13 hours and 10 minutes.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) Google folder

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The phone supports wired charging at 30W and wireless charging at 15W. In comparison, the Galaxy A25 supports 25W wired charging but doesn’t support wireless charging at all.

    When plugged in, the phone charged from zero to 100% in 1 hour and 58 minutes, while the A25 took 1 hour and 25 minutes. 


    Connections: Just the Basics

    The Moto G Power supports sub-6GHz and C-band 5G in the US, but not the faster mmWave technology offered by some networks. I tested the phone using the Google Fi network, which runs on T-Mobile towers. Cell service isn’t amazing in my area, but the Moto G Power still managed speeds of 104Mbps down and 7.96Mbps up. My iPhone 14 Pro on T-Mobile performed better when tested in the same location, with download speeds of 154Mbps and upload speeds of 4.91Mbps. 

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025)

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The phone includes Wi-Fi 6, but not 6E or 7. When tested next to my Wi-Fi 6 router, the phone reached download speeds of 212Mbps and upload speeds of 23Mbps. My iPhone 14 Pro got download speeds of 391Mbps and upload speeds of 22.4Mbps from the same spot. Neither phone performed well at the edge of the Wi-Fi network, where the Moto G Power got 31.7Mbps down and 20.7Mbps up, and the iPhone only mustered 8.83Mbps down and 8.16Mbps up.

    Bluetooth 5.3 and NFC are also onboard.


    Audio: Good Call Quality, Decent Speaker

    Call quality is good. I never had an issue hearing callers or being heard by them. The earpiece peaked at 74.2dB, while the speaker phone maxed out at 83.1dB. These are respectable levels that should be more than loud enough for most people.

    The phone supports Dolby Atmos and does a surprisingly good job of filling a small room with sound. The opening bass line in our test track, The Knife’s “Silent Shout,” actually vibrated the phone in my hand. Of course, you’ll get the best sound by connecting either wired headphones via the 3.5mm headphone jack or wireless earphones.


    Cameras: Average All Around

    The camera hardware remains identical to last year’s model. The phone has a 50MP main camera with an aperture of f/1.8 and optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultra-wide camera with an aperture of f/2.2 that doubles as the macro camera, and a 16MP front-facing camera with an aperture of f/2.4 for selfies. This year, there are four zoom modes instead of the three found in the 2024 version: macro, 0.5x, 1x, and 2x. 

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) camera sample, main camera

    Main camera (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The camera’s sensors struggle with detail, even in bright light. Colors appear artificially bright, while zooming in your photos reveals pixelation and smudging. Here is a progression of the same scene at 0.5x, 1x, and 2x:

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) camera sample 0.5x shot

    Ultra-wide camera at 0.5x (Credit: Sarah Lord )

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) camera sample 1x shot

    Main camera at 1x (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) camera sample 2x shot

    Main camera at 2x (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    The cameras can record 1080p video at 30fps, and the quality is middling. It should be fine for taking home videos of kids or pets, but the footage falls short under scrutiny.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) selfie

    Selfie camera (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    Likewise, the selfie camera did an average job of taking a picture of my dog in low light.


    Software: Not as Much Support as Samsung

    The Moto G Power comes with Android 15 installed, and Motorola says it will offer two years of OS upgrades and three years of security updates. This is well behind Samsung’s A25, which offers four years of OS upgrades and five years of security patches. 

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025) apps

    (Credit: Sarah Lord)

    Thankfully, Motorola has reduced the amount of bloatware this year. It’s still there, of course, but in a way that’s far less intrusive. I’m thankful that the company has removed the large Shopping and Entertainment folders found on last year’s model. 


    Verdict: A Step in the Wrong Direction

    The Motorola Moto G Power for 2025 is almost identical to its predecessor, and that’s not a good thing. Aside from a more durable rating and a marginally larger display, its cameras, battery life, and design are carried over from last year’s model. The biggest issue is the new processor, which delivers slower performance year over year, making the phone hard to recommend. For the same price, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has better cameras, longer battery life, and superior software support, making it our Editors’ Choice.

    Motorola Moto G Power (2025)

    Pros

    • Affordable

    • Good battery life

    • Waterproof

    The Bottom Line

    The 2025 version of the Motorola Moto G Power takes a surprising step back from its predecessor with a less powerful processor that results in slower performance.

    Like What You’re Reading?

    Sign up for Fully Mobilized newsletter to get our top mobile tech stories delivered right to your inbox.

    This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
    By clicking the button, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our
    Terms of Use and
    Privacy Policy.
    You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.

    Newsletter Pointer

    About Sarah Lord

    Analyst, Mobile

    Sarah Lord

    I’m a Mobile Analyst at PCMag, which means I cover wireless phones, plans, tablets, ereaders, and a whole lot more. I’ve always loved technology and have been forming opinions on consumer electronics since childhood. Prior to joining PCMag, I covered TVs and home entertainment at CNET, served as the tech and electronics reviews fellow at Insider, and began my career by writing laptop reviews as an intern at Tom’s Hardware. I am also a professional actor with credits in theater, film, and television.

    Read Sarah’s full bio

    Read the latest from Sarah Lord




  • Vintage Apple, ThinkPad, and Commodore computers still hold their allure

    Vintage Apple, ThinkPad, and Commodore computers still hold their allure


    When Levi Maaia’s mother, a school teacher, brought home the Apple IIGS in the late ‘80s, to say it made a lasting impact is an understatement.

    He and his family used the computer far beyond its recommended lifespan, even after Apple stopped making it. But that didn’t stop Maaia from using the IIGS.


  • LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask review: the future of LED face masks has arrived

    LumaLux Face Pro LED Light Therapy Mask review: the future of LED face masks has arrived



  • Alexa Plus explained: 9 things you need to know about Amazon’s new AI-powered assistant

    Alexa Plus explained: 9 things you need to know about Amazon’s new AI-powered assistant


    So, it’s finally here – just over 10 years since Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant sparked a new (and ultimately underwhelming) age of voice assistants, it’s just been given a major AI brain transplant.

    The new Alexa Plus is rolling out soon in the US, with international availability still unknown. But what exactly can Amazon’s new voice assistant do, and will it actually be worth the monthly subscription (or signing up to Amazon Prime) to get early access?




  • What is ARIA and how can it make UK tech competitive?

    What is ARIA and how can it make UK tech competitive?



    The Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) is a UK-based research and development funding agency established to catalyze transformative scientific and technological breakthroughs.

    The success of the UK’s COVID response – exemplified by initiatives like the Vaccines Taskforce and Rapid Response Funds – has highlighted the importance of agile funding models. ARIA seeks to apply these lessons, operating as a flexible, independent body dedicated to high-risk, high-reward projects.


  • Best free VPN for Android 2025: Which ones can you trust?

    Best free VPN for Android 2025: Which ones can you trust?



  • Corsair Titan 360 RX RGB AIO review: Excellent for iCue

    Corsair Titan 360 RX RGB AIO review: Excellent for iCue


    Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware


    Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

    Today we’re looking at Corsair’s latest AIO, the iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB. Most users interested in this AIO will be interested in it due to its compatibility with the iCUE ecosystem, which allows for a ton of customization options – including cooler upgrades like optional VRM fan modules or even adding a fancy LCD screen. In common scenarios, this cooler has some of the lowest noise levels I’ve seen thus far – but it isn’t without flaws, as I’ll detail below

    Will this AIO make our list of Best CPU Coolers? Let’s take a look at the specifications and features of the Titan RX RGB AIO, then we’ll go over thermal performance and noise levels.

    Corsair Titan 360 RX RGB AIO

    (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

    Cooler specifications

    Swipe to scroll horizontally

    Cooler

    Corsair iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB

    MSRP

    $199 USD

    Radiator Material

    Aluminum

    Pump Speed

    Up to ~3000 RPM

    Lighting

    iCUE Link for CPU Block and fans

    Warranty

    6 Years

    Socket Compatibility

    Intel Socket LGA 1851/1700 AMD AM5 / AM4

    Unit Dimensions (including fans)

    396 (L) x 120 (W) x 52mm (D)

    Base

    Copper cold plate

    Maximum TDP (Our Testing)

    >265W with Intel’s i7-14700K


  • Why TV speakers suck and is Panasonic leaving the US again? | You Asked

    Why TV speakers suck and is Panasonic leaving the US again? | You Asked


    On today’s You Asked: Why do TV speakers suck — and why even bother putting speakers in TVs? Why don’t TVs get five HDMI ports? Will Panasonic abandon the US again, and should you even buy one of their TVs?

    Why do TV speakers suck? (Can we axe them?)

    TCL QM6K
    Zeke Jones / Digital Trends

    Mike writes: Why on earth, in 2025, do TVs still insist on wasting space with built-in, inadequate speakers? I can understand lower budget/entry-level TVs, but if people are spending $2,000+, are they likely using an AVR or soundbar? I’d think the added real estate and the cost savings would entice the TV makers to drop the speakers in their higher-end TVs. Plus, they could push their own brand of crappy soundbars. Thanks!

    First off, not all soundbars are crappy. However, I do understand your point. To address this whole speakers-in-TVs issue, let’s talk about TV tuners.

    Did you know that in 2016 and 2017 TV brand Vizio removed over-the-air tuners from its M series and P series TVs? This move meant they weren’t allowed to call them “TVs.” In the US, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) requires that to be called a television, a display must have an over-the-air tuner. Vizio had to market them as monitors or home theater displays.

    Vizio may have thought at the time, Everything is going to streaming now and many of our customers will likely never use a tuner, and besides, you can stream a lot of live TV now, too. Soon, folks won’t even need an antenna, so why not stand out by going in a new direction and omit the tuner?

    Vizio P Series P65 F1
    Dan Baker / Digital Trends

    If this was Vizio’s thinking at the time, it seems a bit like an Apple move, right? Apple is all: We’re removing the headphone jack from our phones because who uses wired headphones anymore? Everything’s going wireless. We have to be bold. We have to have the “courage” to do this.

    Except Vizio wasn’t Apple, and the consumer reaction to the tuner being removed was not warmly received (which is an understatement). Vizio ended up walking back that decision. Some could argue that was the beginning of the brand’s decline from a once strong market position. The lesson here: Don’t make Apple moves unless you have Apple money and Apple power.

    Some of us can’t imagine having a high performance or high-end expensive TV without a similarly premium audio system to go with it — we see the speakers built into the TV as completely unnecessary. However, a reminder: Folks who feel this way are very much in the minority. TV manufacturers actually pay attention to feedback from their customers, especially when that feedback indicates that a decision resulted in lost revenue. They likely know that if they did not include speakers in their TVs, the backlash would be uproarious, and companies can’t afford that kind of negative PR. The Vizio situation is likely regarded as a stark example of “what not to do.”

    Beyond that, there’s not much to be gained by not putting speakers in a TV. It wouldn’t lower costs significantly or make the TV noticeably slimmer. There’s really no upside. Omitting speakers is a high-risk gamble that would not pay meaningful dividends.

    If a TV brand had the same amount of market-shifting power and control as Apple, I suppose they could force people to get supplemental audio systems. Yet, even if they had that kind of power (and they wouldn’t), it’s the kind of bold move that could sink a brand. So, I don’t see it happening anytime soon.

    Which brings us to the question: Why do TV speakers tend to suck? TV manufacturers may have to put speakers in a TV, but that doesn’t mean they are motivated to make them great. The speakers need to be just good enough to not piss people off. There’s a big difference between not having something at all and having something that is disappointing but ancillary to the primary function of the device: the picture.

    Also, consumer obsession over increasingly thin TVs forced manufacturers to come up with audio solutions that fit in very little space. However, transducers by their very nature need some space to sound good. It also helps if they are firing at your ears, as opposed to down at the floor. As manufacturers put weaker and weaker audio systems in their TVs that continued to sell well, they learned that customers would accept paltry audio systems if the TV on the whole was good enough.

    There are some exceptions to this rule. Some extremely high-end TVs from Hisense, TCL, Sony, and Panasonic include premium audio systems. Sometimes that effort works well, and sometimes it doesn’t.

    Panasonic Z95A
    Zeke Jones / Digital Trends

    A good audio system does add some cost and complexity to a TV, and in some cases it can even be a bit of a gamble — specifically, the Panasonic Z95A, which basically has a built-in soundbar strip at the bottom of the TV. It sounds great, but some folks don’t love how it looks. It reminds me of when Sony built speaker strips onto the left and right side of some TV models. It sounded pretty good, but folks disliked the look, and Sony swiftly discontinued the practice.

    There isn’t a lot of motivation to outfit a television with a premium audio solution, but there’s also a lot of risk involved in not including one at all. It makes sense to take that good-enough approach and leave it at that.

    More HDMI ports, please

    Sony Bravia 8 OLED
    Zeke Jones / Digital Trends

    Dionicio writes: With the high number of devices we’re able to connect to our TVs, is there any reason why TV manufacturers do not simply add a fifth HDMI port?

    This is a really interesting question. As part of my answer, I remind folks that, as enthusiasts, we may assume our personal needs or wants are similar to those of the greater public. However, that’s just not the case.

    Anecdotally, I can tell you that many folks don’t connect anything to their TVs — other than a soundbar, perhaps. The surge in streaming popularity and the convenience of built-in streaming platforms makes it easy to buy a TV and not require another device. Cable and satellite subscribers are dwindling at a faster rate than ever, so those cable and satellite boxes are taking up fewer HDMI ports on TVs. Also, disc players and disc sales are on a steep decline (much to my chagrin).

    ps5-hdmi-cable
    Digital Trends

    Game consoles are super popular, and most households have just one — and not two, three, or four. Increasingly, more people need just a single HDMI port and a huge chunk of the public don’t even use the three or four HDMI ports they have.
    This is why we don’t see more TVs from brands like Sony, Panasonic, TCL, and Hisense including four HDMI 2.1 ports – the need doesn’t exist at a high enough scale for companies like MediaTek, which makes the System on Chip (SoC) that brands use in their TVs.

    From a business decision perspective, I think we’re more likely to see four HDMI 2.1 ports from MediaTek before we see five HDMI ports. Also, this would require a complete redesign of the existing boards to accommodate the space, and that one decision would set off a flurry of TV redesigns. Even small changes at scale take a lot of work.

    As enthusiasts, it’s easy to assume everyone else feels similarly and has the same needs and wants as we do. In the same way that most folks don’t even want a desktop computer — let alone one with a $2,000 graphics card — most folks don’t require five HDMI ports. So, we’re forced to use A/V receivers or external HDMI switchers to fill our niche needs. (I like that, though. It costs a bit of money, but that’s what this hobby requires.)

    Take a pause on Panasonic?

    Panasonic Z95B
    Digital Trends

    Patrick writes: I’m still really considering the Z95B. Does the recent news about Panasonic necessarily make this one to avoid? Would FireTV updates come from Amazon?

    As many TV enthusiasts already know, there is some worry that Panasonic could end up selling off its TV division in about a year or so. This comes from Panasonic Holdings Company President Yuki Kusumi, who made that statement during an online press conference on February 4. Naturally, with the future of Panasonic’s TV business in question, some are wondering whether it is smart to buy a Panasonic TV.

    My answer: Yes, I think it is safe to buy a Panasonic TV, and for two reasons — one is practically and analytically based and one is more personal (and optimistic). However, I obviously don’t have a crystal ball, so don’t come at me if you buy a Panasonic TV and then Panasonic exits the US market in a year.

    Panasonic Z95A
    Zeke Jones / Digital Trends

    Not only do we lack a crystal ball, we don’t have adequate insight into the motivation behind Kusumi’s statement. It is possible he needs it known that he is a smart, practical businessman who is looking at all options that will help ensure the long-term health of Panasonic’s business holdings, which, by the way, are vast. Simply acknowledging that something is under consideration can give shareholders enough confidence to prevent them from bailing out, further threatening the company’s financial viability.

    There’s no guarantee that a sale is inevitable, and I don’t think we have enough information to read this as “Panasonic TV is on the ropes.” At least I hope not.

    I do think that Panasonic’s re-entry into the US market is a sign that the brand believes that if it is successful at regaining part of the US TV market share, it will help strengthen its TV division overall. Given how much it took to make that happen, I take it as a sign that there’s more optimism than pessimism around their TV business right now.

    One way to help ensure Panasonic’s TVs continue being true Panasonic TVs — and not just another brand licensed out to some other manufacturer — is to buy Panasonic TVs. They are excellent TVs. I think it is safe to purchase one even if Panasonic sells off its TV division, and, in a possible worst-case scenario, stops sending out firmware updates. The TVs are good enough that they won’t need a ton of firmware updates, and any updates to streaming apps will be on the Amazon side. The TV should still be viable for many years.

    Panasonic Z95A
    Zeke Jones / Digital Trends

    If we still have die-hard fans of Pioneer Kuro and Panasonic plasmas out there happily rocking their TVs, a Panasonic TV purchased today is going to hold up well — at least as well as, if not better than, most TVs produced today. The replacement cycle of TVs is now much shorter than it used to be, but relative to that replacement cycle, I think a Panasonic TV purchase now is as safe as it gets.

    On a personal note, I hope that Panasonic’s TV business can stay healthy and see consistent growth in the US market. Competition in this space is a good thing for consumers. On a more practical note, I don’t think we have enough information to be forecasting doom and gloom for Panasonic TVs — not yet, anyway. We’re seeing the kind of headlines that get clicks — and there’s some merit to the concern — but I think it’s far too early to be forecasting demise.

    That statement may not age well. I could be wrong. But right now, the way things are going in this world? I am choosing optimism and hard work over pessimism and surrender.







  • DJI Flip review: A unique and useful creator drone with a few flaws

    DJI Flip review: A unique and useful creator drone with a few flaws


    After creating a stir with the $200 Neo, DJI is back at it with another innovative drone, the Flip. It has a first-of-a-kind folding design and shrouded propellers to keep people safe. It also integrates 3D infrared obstacle detection to track subjects and has a long list of impressive features.

    With a camera borrowed from the Mini 4 Pro, the Flip can take high-quality 4K 60p video indoors or out with little risk. It comes with vlogger-friendly features like Direction Track and Quickshots for social media. And it can be flown with either DJI’s controllers, a smartphone, voice control or the push of a button.

    There’s no need for a permit to fly it, and best of all, it’s priced at $439 with an RC-N3 controller included — making it one of the more affordable drones available. To see how well it serves creators, I flew it inside a castle, a 500-year-old house and out in nature. It’s not perfect (hello, stiff winds and obstacles), and it has some stiff competition with the HoverAir X1 Pro, but it’s one of the most useful creator drones yet.

    The Flip has a clever, user-friendly design. All four propellers fold down and stack below the body like some kind of Star Wars spacecraft. DJI chose this construction so that it could incorporate permanent (rather than detachable) shrouds that protect the props to limit damage or injury in case of a collision. The design also employs large propellers that aid performance and reduce noise. By comparison, DJI’s Neo has tiny, fast-spinning propellers that make a high-pitched shrieking noise.

    DJI kept the takeoff weight including battery and microSD card under 250 grams by using carbon fiber and other lightweight materials. This means the Flip can be flown without special permits. It’s still rather bulky though, especially compared to the sleek HoverAir X1 Pro.

    The Flip has far better battery life than its rival, however. DJI promises up to 34 minutes max flight time (about 27 minutes in real-world conditions), compared to just 16 minutes for the X1 Pro. The batteries can be charged up quickly as well, taking about 35 minutes each with the optional four-battery charger. You’ll need a memory card, though, as the Flip only has 2GB of internal storage.

    The Flip is DJI’s first lightweight drone with a 3D infrared sensor for forward obstacle avoidance and it also has a downward vision sensor for landing spot detection and stability. However, unlike the Mini 4 Pro and other DJI drones, it has no side or rear obstacle sensors. 

    One small issue is that the Flip’s propellers don’t have much clearance, so they can snag even in short grass on takeoffs. Like the Neo, though, it’s designed more for takeoffs and landings from your hand. To that end, it has a button on the opposite side of the power switch to select a flight mode and takeoff automatically, just like the Neo. It can also be flown with the app, voice control or manually with a controller — either the DJI RC-N3 controller (which requires a smartphone) or the RC 2 controller with a built-in 5.5-inch display.

    DJI Flip drone review: A folding, user-friendly marvel for content creators
    Steve Dent for Engadget

    The Flip can hum along at up to 26 mph in sport mode, which isn’t bad for a light drone, but a good bit slower than the Mini 4 Pro (37 mph). However, the reduced weight and large surface area means it’s not the best in high winds. When it flew over the roof of a castle, for example, it got hit by a gust that pushed it nearly backwards.

    However, the Flip can do things that you’d never attempt with a Mini 4 Pro. The full propeller protection, stability and relatively low noise make it well-suited for flying inside large rooms full of fragile objects and people. That, along with the excellent picture quality, means it’s a great choice for event professionals and content creators working in public spaces.

    It’s also perfect for beginners, because like the Neo, you can launch the Flip off your hand at the push of a button. It will then fly a pre-programmed mode and land back where it started. One of those modes, Direction Track, allows the drone to fly backwards and follow you for vlogging. There’s also a follow mode for activities like running and hiking, along with social media-friendly flight modes like Dronie, Rocket, Circle, Helix and Boomerang. Note that video in these automatic modes is limited to 4K 30 fps.

    At the same time, the Flip is easy to fly manually either with a smartphone or the supported controllers. Though not as maneuverable as the Mini 4 Pro, it’s easier for novices to fly and makes a stable camera platform. You do need to be careful in areas with untextured floors (painted concrete, for instance), as it can throw off the Flip’s sensors and make it unstable. When that happens, your best bet is to switch it into sport mode to disable the vision-based flight stability sensors (and then fly carefully because obstacle detection will also be disabled).

    DJI’s Flip drone is a folding, user-friendly marvel for content creators
    Steve Dent for Engadget

    Oddly, the Flip doesn’t work with DJI’s Goggles N3 and Motion 3 controller, unlike the much cheaper Neo. That’s because DJI sees it predominantly as a camera drone rather than an acrobatic device.

    If you’re hoping to use the Flip to track yourself or others, there’s a big issue: It lacks obstacle detection in any direction except forward or down. If you’re flying the drone backwards, for instance, you have to make sure there’s nothing behind it can crash into. And automatic obstacle avoidance doesn’t work at all when you use the Flip’s smart features like Direction Track or ActiveTrack, though the drone will stop 10 feet before hitting anything it detects. The lack of that feature is odd, since obstacle avoidance is an important part of subject tracking, and DJI didn’t say if it had plans to rectify that issue via a future update. None of this is an issue with the HoverAir X1 Pro, which can track forwards, backwards and even sideways with full obstacle detection enabled.

    The Flip has excellent range for such a tiny drone at up to eight miles, thanks to DJI’s O4 transmission system. At the same time, it can send a high quality 1080p 60 fps video signal that can be recorded to the controller as a backup. However, if you’re flying using your smartphone with a Wi-Fi connection, range is limited to just 165 feet.

    DJI’s Flip drone is a folding, user-friendly marvel for content creators
    Samuel Dejours for Engadget

    The cameras are the biggest difference between the Flip and the Neo. The Flip comes with a much larger 1/1.3-inch 48-megapixel sensor and a 24mm-equivalent wide angle F/1.7 lens. It’s the same as the one on the Mini 4 Pro and provides sharp, noise-free video in good light.

    You can shoot 4K video at up to 60 fps (100 fps in slow-mo mode), rather than just 30 fps like the Neo. In addition, the Flip supports 10-bit D-LogM video that allows for improved dynamic range in bright lighting, like on ski slopes. You can also capture 12MP or 48MP RAW (DNG) photos.

    Video quality is noticeably sharper than on the Neo and the Flip is a far better drone for night shoots or dimly lit indoor settings thanks to the lower noise levels. Though the DJI Air 3S and Mavic 4 offer higher quality due to the larger sensors, there isn’t a large difference in good light. Since the Flip has just a single camera, video is noticeably more noisy when using the 2x zoom. Note that when shooting in the automated modes (Direction Track, Dronie, etc.) there is no manual control of the camera to adjust exposure, shutter speed and ISO.

    The HoverAir X1 Pro has the same-sized 1/1.3-inch sensor and offers very similar video quality (with a log mode as well), though I find DJI’s colors to be a touch more accurate. The HoverAir has slightly inferior 4K 60p video unless you spend an extra $200 for the Pro Max version to get 8K 30fps and 4K 120fps.

    With a three-axis gimbal, the Flip shoots silky smooth video even if it’s being buffeted by winds. You can choose Follow mode to keep the camera level even when the drone banks, or FPV mode that allows the camera to tilt for a more exciting first-person perspective. Generally, video remains smooth even with sudden maneuvers, while footage from the HoverAir X1 Pro exhibits occasional jolts and janky movements.

    The Flip’s camera doesn’t rotate 90 degrees like the one on the Mini 4 Pro, so maximum resolution for vertical video is 2.7K — a step backwards from the 4K 60 fps 9:16 vertical video on the Mini 4 Pro.

    DJI’s Flip drone is a folding, user-friendly marvel for content creators
    Steve Dent for Engadget

    The Flip represents a bold change in direction (and design) for DJI. Unlike open prop drones, it gives creators the ability to shoot indoors and around people with relatively high video quality. And it does this for just $439 — much less than the $759 Mini 4 Pro. However, the Flip isn’t perfect, with its main flaws being the reduced maneuverability, problems in wind and lack of obstacle avoidance when using smart modes like ActiveTrack.

    As I mentioned, DJI also has some serious competition in this category, namely the $500 HoverAir X1 Pro. Both offer features like palm takeoff, intelligent flight modes and subject tracking and have similar quality, but the HoverAir X1 Pro offers rear-side active collision detection, a wider lens and more internal storage. It’s also about half the size of the Flip. For its part, the Flip has double the flight time and a much longer transmission range.

    The choice then depends on what you want. If portability, subject tracking and obstacle avoidance are key, the HoverAir X1 Pro is a better option. Others who prioritize battery life, smoother video and a more established company should choose the Flip. In any case, DJI usually dominates all drone categories, so it’s nice to see multiple products facing off in this creator-centric space.

    This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/dji-flip-review-a-unique-and-useful-creator-drone-with-a-few-flaws-181507462.html?src=rss


  • 12 Best Wi-Fi Routers of 2025, Tested and Reviewed

    12 Best Wi-Fi Routers of 2025, Tested and Reviewed


    Other Routers We Have Tested

    I have tested some other routers and have several more in the queue. These aren’t as great as the picks above but are worth considering.

    Overhead view of Netgear Nighthawk M6 Pro a black squareshaped WiFi router beside a mobile phone with both devices on a...

    Netgear Nighthawk M6 Pro

    Photograph: Simon Hill

    Netgear Nighthawk M6 Pro for $800: While I am keen to add a 5G router and mobile hot spot to this guide, and the Nighthawk M6 Pro is an excellent performer, it is simply too expensive to recommend for most folks. (I plan to test cheaper models in the coming weeks.) That said, the M6 Pro is easy to use and might suit business folks with an expense account. Pop a 5G SIM in there and you have a tri-band Wi-Fi 6E router (2.4-, 5-, and 6-GHz) with a sturdy design, a handy 2.8-inch touchscreen, a 2.5-gigabit Ethernet port, and a battery that’s good for up to 13 hours of use. You can connect up to 32 devices via Wi-Fi and expect a range of around 1,000 square feet. You can also use the Ethernet port as a WAN connection or employ the M6 Pro as a secure Wi-Fi repeater. It’s versatile, but configuration can be a chore, speeds are limited if you want to extend battery life, and it’s too expensive.

    Asus RT-BE86U for $300: The new Wi-Fi 7 version of the Asus RT-AX86U listed above, this dual band (2.4- and 5-GHz) router is very similar to the Asus RT-BE88U below. It lacks the 6-GHz band but brings all the other improvements that Wi-Fi 7 offers, from MLO to better security. The RT-BE86U proved reliable in my tests and performed extremely well on the 5-GHz band, matching the slightly more expensive RT-BE88U. It is slightly smaller but still has one 10-Gbps and four 2.5-Gbps Ethernet ports, alongside a USB 2.0 and a USB 3.0 port. It also offers all the usual benefits of an Asus router, including onboard security, parental controls, AiMesh and VPN support, and a host of configuration options. It’s perhaps a little pricey at the moment, but when this router starts to drop, it will be a solid choice for many homes and may well claim a place above.

    Netgear Nighthawk RS200 for $200: The RS200 is Netgear’s dual-band (2.4- and 5-GHz) Wi-Fi 7 router and the cheapest in its Wi-Fi 7 lineup. After the tri-band RS300 won a recommendation, I expected this router to put in a decent performance, but I encountered several issues, including random drops and poor range. After turning the router off and on again, many devices, including my Pixel and iPhone, struggled to reconnect. Perhaps I have too many devices in my home for it, though Netgear suggests it can handle up to 80. It has two 2.5 Gbps, three Gigabit Ethernet, and a USB 3.0 port. Test results were OK, but significantly slower than the RT-BE86U. The expensive subscriptions for Netgear Armor ($100/year) and Premium Smart Parental Controls ($8/month or $70/year) seem especially expensive with a cheaper router like this.

    The TP Link Archer GE800 wifi router sitting on a shelf a black device with angular bottom and orange illuminated panels

    The TP Link Archer GE800 Wi-Fi Router

    Photograph: Simon Hill

    TP-Link Archer GE800 for $450: This stunning tri-band Wi-Fi 7 gaming router came very close to a place above. The angled design with customizable RGB lighting screams Vader’s castle but also provides room for antennas to ensure extremely fast performance across the board. You also get a 10-Gbps port for your incoming internet connection, a further two 10-Gbps and four 2.5-Gbps Ethernet LAN ports, and a USB 3.0 port. The Tether app is solid, with some gaming-specific options, but separate subscriptions are required for extra security and parental controls. Despite the blazing fast results, the GE800 couldn’t quite match our top Wi-Fi 7 gaming pick above on the 6-GHz band, and it produced quite a lot of heat and audible fan noise, though it is significantly cheaper.

    Asus RT-BE88U for $300: This dual-band Wi-Fi 7 router is an odd prospect because it does not offer the 6-GHz band at all, just 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. But you can still combine those bands with MLO and enjoy features like 4K QAM, and this router will be fast enough for the average home. It has ports galore (two 10 Gbps, four 2.5 Gbps, four Gigabit, and one USB 3.0). It outperformed several more expensive routers on the 5-GHz band, and that’s likely what most of your devices are using most of the time right now. Asus also offers free security software and parental controls with its routers, so there’s no need for subscriptions. But when I consider that you can snag the Netgear Nighthawk RS300 listed above for less, I find it tough to recommend this router to folks in the US. If the 6-GHz band is unavailable or nerfed in your country, the RT-BE88U is for you.

    TP-Link Travel Router AX1500 for $60: If you don’t want to spend much on a travel router, this is a good alternative to our pick above and less than half the price. The catch is that you can expect around half the performance. If you just need to cover a hotel room, it’s fine, but the USB 2.0 port limits the effectiveness of using your phone’s cellular connection, and the 2.4-GHz band is only Wi-Fi 4. It does have two Gigabit ports, some handy modes, and VPN support. I also love that it is powered via USB-C, as it affords some versatility (you could even use a fast portable charger).

    Netgear Nighthawk RS700 for $550: Although I had setup issues that required a factory reset, there’s no hiding the top-notch performance of this router. It’s a Wi-Fi 7 tri-band router with two 10-Gbps Ethernet ports, four gigabit ports, and a USB 3.2. The tower design is new for the Nighthawk line, and it looks great. This router will blend in far better than our bulky Wi-Fi 7 pick above from Asus, and it was slightly faster on the 6-GHz band, though not the 5-GHz or 2.4-GHz bands. It mainly misses out on a recommendation because it is more expensive. We’re already seeing discounts on the RT-BE96U, and Asus offers free security software and parental controls. If you get the Nighthawk RS700S, the “S” at the end denotes a free year of Netgear Armor, which costs $100 a year thereafter. If you need parental controls, that’s another $70 a year.

    TP-Link Archer GX90 AX6600 for $180: Picks above too expensive? The slightly more affordable TP-Link Archer GX90 (8/10, WIRED Recommends) might tempt you. It looks like a Sith spider, but this gaming-focused behemoth is feature-packed. It’s easy to set up and configure, and boasts a game accelerator feature and prioritization, making it easy to reserve bandwidth for gaming. I had no issues with multiple simultaneous gaming sessions. It has a 2.5-Gbps WAN/LAN port, a gigabit WAN/LAN port, three gigabit LAN ports, and two USB ports (3.0 and 2.0). Sadly, full parental controls and enhanced security require subscriptions.

    Aircove ExpressVPN Router for $190: This router has a built-in VPN service, allowing you to shield your network traffic from prying eyes. You do have to buy a subscription to ExpressVPN separately (it’s $13 per month, or just over $8 if you pay annually). But setup is simple, and having a VPN at the router level is much easier than having to install it on each device (though several of our picks above can do this too). It’s worth noting that ExpressVPN doesn’t make our Best VPNs guide because it was sold to a parent company with a less-than-sterling reputation; that might matter to you if you’re the kind of person who wants a VPN. I also ran into a few issues with websites and streaming services that aren’t keen on VPNs.

    Front view of 3 devices plugged in. Left to right Tall oval shaped device square shaped device flat disc shaped device.

    Photograph: Simon Hill

    Vodafone Pro II from £37 a month: Folks in the UK looking for a new internet service provider (ISP) should check out Vodafone’s Pro II (8/10, WIRED Review). While ISPs have traditionally provided shoddy routers to their customers, that seems to be changing. The Vodafone Pro II is a tri-band router that supports Wi-Fi 6E, and it delivered lightning-fast speeds in my tests, on par with many of my picks above. The range is limited, especially on the 6-GHz band, but this service comes with a range extender that appears as part of the same network. You can also get a 4G backup that connects to Vodafone’s mobile network to keep you online should your regular internet connection fail. It’s only available with a two-year Vodafone service contract, starting from £37 a month.

    Firewalla Gold SE for $449: This quirky portable device is perfect for people who worry about security and privacy. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring all traffic in and out of your house, robust and detailed parental controls, ad-blocking, and enhanced security with a built-in firewall and VPN option. It serves as a router, but you will want to pair another router in access point mode for Wi-Fi in your home. It’s expensive and may prove intimidating for inexperienced folks, but it offers deep insight into your network and an impressive depth of security features without an additional subscription. The Gold SE has two 2.5-Gbps ports and two gigabit ports and is suitable for folks with up to 2-gigabit connections. If your internet is only one gigabit, try the more affordable but slightly less capable, Firewalla Purple ($359) (8/10, WIRED recommends).

    TP-Link Archer BE800 for $477: With a fresh design that’s more desktop PC than router, the BE800 (8/10, WIRED Review) tri-band beast came out on top or close to it in my tests on the 2.4-GHz, 5-GHz, and 6-GHz bands, proving impressively swift for file transfers and downloads. It also boasts speedy ports galore, a cool but kind of pointless customizable dot-matrix LED screen, and the Tether app offers a guest network, IoT network, VPN server or client, EasyMesh, QoS for device prioritization, and remote management. This was our Wi-Fi 7 pick, but the Asus RT-BE96U beat it in my tests and does not require a subscription. TP-Link’s Security+ ($5/month, $36/year) and Advanced Parental Controls ($3/month, $18/year) bring full-featured parental controls and network security.

    Reyee RG-E6 for $140: This affordable gaming router from Reyee is a decent budget gaming pick that recorded some impressive test results. It is only a dual-band router, but with support for 160-MHz channels, the speeds on the 5-GHz band were very good. It has a 2.5-Gbps WAN/LAN and three gigabit LANs, but no USB ports. Reyee’s app offers prioritization for devices, ports, and gaming traffic, separate guest and IoT networks, and basic parental controls. What it lacks is any security, and the app is poorly translated. But if that doesn’t bother you, this is likely the best gaming router you can get for the money.

    TP-Link Archer AXE75 for $150: While this tri-band router makes Wi-Fi 6E affordable, its performance was mixed. The 6-GHz band offers fast speeds at close range but drops off sharply with distance. I found the 5-GHz band somewhat inconsistent, recording zippy performance in most of my tests but relatively slow results on a few occasions. You also need subscriptions if you want full-featured parental controls and network security, and all four Ethernet ports are limited to 1 Gbps.

    Synology WRX560 for $220: If you already have the Synology RT6600ax listed above, the WRX560 is a decent additional device for setting up a mesh network. I had some issues with setup that required a factory reset, but once up and running, the WRX560 offers a strong and stable signal on the 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz bands. However, a dual-band Wi-Fi 6 router is a tough sell at this price, so if you just need one, it’s worth spending the extra $80 for the RT6600ax.

    TP-Link Archer AX5400 Pro for $200: This dual-band Wi-Fi 6 router is almost identical to the Archer AX73, except for the 2.5-Gbps WAN port. It delivers relatively fast speeds on the 2.4-GHz and 5-GHz bands and boasts a 160-MHz channel width on 5 GHz. The range is good, easily covering my home and garden, but the performance was inconsistent. It was also relatively slow at moving files locally. There’s support for TP-Link OneMesh, VPN, and QoS, but you only get basic parental controls and network security unless you subscribe.

    MSi RadiX AXE6600 for $153: This Wi-Fi 6E tri-band gaming router has that familiar red and black Sith spider look, though you can customize the lighting. It proved very fast in most of my tests, coming close to the top of the table at short range on the 6-GHz band and offering average performance on the 5-GHz and 2.4-GHz bands. But the mobile app had limited options, a confusing layout, and was buggy (it crashed on me more than once). The web interface was better, with more options, including open VPN, simple parental controls, guest network, and QoS optimization for gaming. Unfortunately, performance was inconsistent, and I suffered random drops twice in a week of testing.

    Linksys Hydra Pro 6E for $159: One of the first Wi-Fi 6E tri-band routers (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz) to hit the market, the price has dropped significantly since release. It proved easy to set up and has a very straightforward app, though it was often slow to load. It has a 5-Gbps WAN port and four gigabit LAN ports. The performance proved reliable, and it’s possible to get lightning-fast speeds at close range if you have a device that supports Wi-Fi 6E. Coverage and speeds at mid and long range were average. There are free basic parental controls that enable you to block sites and schedule downtime, but only on a per-device basis (no profile creation or age restrictions filters). You can split bands if you want to and prioritize three devices. There’s also a guest network option and easy Wi-Fi sharing. Another positive is that this router works with any other Linksys Intelligent Mesh router (including the Velop mesh range).

    Linksys Hydra 6 for $100: Specs-wise, this compact router is similar to our top pick (TP-Link Archer AX55). It’s a dual-band Wi-Fi 6 router with a gigabit WAN and four gigabit LAN ports. The setup was easy, and it uses the same Linksys app as the Pro 6E above, so you get free parental controls, guest network, prioritization, and band splitting. It proved speedy at close range and not bad at mid-range, but if your home is larger than 1,600 square feet, it may struggle. However, as an Intelligent Mesh router, it can mix and match with other Linksys routers or its Velop mesh system. Linksys suggests a limit of 25 connected devices. Although it managed more than 40 without issues in my testing, busy households will likely want something more powerful.