Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: future of ai
iPhone SE 4 Rumors: Apple’s New Phone Could Adopt iPhone 14’s Modern Aesthetic
A new iPhone in February? Apple could release a new version of the iPhone SE as early as next week, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Rumors suggest the new iPhone SE will inherit the iPhone 14’s design, signaling the end of the home button and a shift away from smaller screens. At $429, the iPhone SE is Apple’s most affordable phone before discounts and could make a big comeback in 2025.
Unlike with Apple’s flagship iPhone family, the iPhone SE’s launch timing is somewhat irregular. The first generation SE launched in 2016, followed by the second version in 2020 and the third in March 2022. Apple also hasn’t mentioned whether it plans to release new iPhone SE models moving forward, as it rarely speaks about future products.
Read more: I’ve Been Using the iPhone 16 For a Month. Here’s What Stands Out
There’s plenty of room for Apple to further improve its cheaper iPhone. While my colleague Patrick Holland praised the 2022 iPhone SE for its accessible price and familiar home button, he criticized it for its lack of night mode photos and dated design. Android competitors like Samsung and Google have also improved their similarly priced budget phones in recent years. The Google Pixel 8A and Samsung Galaxy A55 5G both offer features once reserved for premium devices, like high refresh rates and multiple cameras.
It’s impossible to know exactly what to expect from Apple until the company makes an announcement. Based on predictions and reports from Bloomberg, MacRumors and the plugged-in TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, along with other leaks and Apple’s product launch history, here’s what we’d expect from Apple’s next budget iPhone.
Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment regarding a future iPhone SE when this story was originally published.
Watch this: The iPhone SE Is Back! Apple Expected To Launch a New Version Soon
iPhone SE 4 may launch in early 2025
There has been a lot of back-and-forth about the iPhone SE 4’s launch timing in recent years. But an August report from the often-accurate Mark Gurman of Bloomberg suggests that a new iPhone SE could debut in the beginning of 2025. That suggests it may arrive in the first quarter, which would line up with Apple’s previous iPhone SE release dates. The first and third generation models, for example, both launched in March.
The analyst Kuo also reported in October that mass production of the new iPhone SE would begin in December 2024, further indication that an early 2025 release may be in store for Apple’s next tiny phone.
The reports come after rumors and speculation about the iPhone SE’s existence have been uncertain over the last several years. In 2019, Kuo said Apple was working on an iPhone SE with a full-screen design similar to the iPhone XR, as MacRumors reported at the time. Apple has released two versions of the iPhone SE since then that retain the old iPhone 8-inspired design, which raised questions about whether the model Kuo was referring to has been canceled or postponed.
Kuo’s 2023 predictions regarding the iPhone SE 4 have also been mixed. He reported last January that an iPhone SE originally planned for 2024 was canceled but followed up to say the project had been revived. He changed his prediction again in April 2023 to say that the model he previously referred to might just be an engineering prototype for an Apple in-house 5G baseband chip. His previous comments also suggested the iPhone SE 4 would include this 5G chip.
Read more: Inside the Apple Watch Series 10’s New Sleep Apnea Detection Feature
But newer reports, including one from MacRumors, indicate Apple is indeed developing a new iPhone SE that reportedly includes some dramatic upgrades.
It will likely have a new processor and Apple Intelligence
The iPhone SE typically has the same processor as Apple’s most recent flagship iPhone. For example, the 2022 iPhone SE has the same chip as the iPhone 13, which launched in September 2021. Since Apple’s newest mobile chip is usually the iPhone SE’s standout feature, it’s hard to imagine Apple straying from that pattern.
But that’s more important than ever now that Apple Intelligence, the company’s suite of new AI features, is dependent on the company’s latest chips. The iPhone 16 family and last year’s Pro models are the only iPhones capable of running these features for now. But based on Apple’s history and Bloomberg’s report, which says the iPhone SE 4 will support Apple Intelligence, it looks like that could change in the coming months.
Apple Intelligence includes new AI-powered features such as the ability to rewrite, summarize and proofread text, a new version of Siri that’s better at understanding words even when you fumble, the ability to erase objects in photos, and notification and message summaries, among other features. The first wave of Apple Intelligence arrived in Apple’s iOS 18.1 update, while more features — such as the ability to generate custom emoji — will come later in iOS 18.2.
Otherwise, the next iPhone SE could have an Apple-made 5G chip, according to Kuo. Still, it’s hard to know if that prediction still applies since he later revised his estimate to say this device was likely an engineering prototype to test that 5G chip. MacRumors also reports that the iPhone SE 4 will have an Apple-made 5G modem.
An iPhone 14-like design with an OLED screen
The iPhone 14
If the company is working on another iPhone SE, it will likely have a 6.1-inch screen similar to Apple’s modern flagship phones. The current iPhone SE, by comparison, has a 4.7-inch screen with thick borders at the top and chin, much like the iPhone 8.
In particular, the iPhone SE 4 is expected to look a lot like the iPhone 14, which Apple launched in 2022. A MacRumors article reported in September 2023 that the iPhone SE 4 will have a modified version of the iPhone 14’s chassis and reiterated that point again in November. Bloomberg’s report also suggests the iPhone SE 4 will resemble Apple’s two-year-old flagship.
It’s not just the design that’s expected to get an upgrade; the display will see improvements too. Multiple reports, including those from Kuo, MacRumors, Bloomberg, The Elec and Nikkei Asia, suggest the next iPhone SE will have an OLED screen instead of LCD. That’s a big deal because OLED typically displays richer contrast and deeper blacks, and these types of screens are consistent across the rest of Apple’s iPhone lineup.
Read more: Thinking About Buying a Foldable Phone? Here’s How to Decide
The iPhone SE will likely have a larger battery
The next iPhone SE could inherit the iPhone 14’s battery as well, according to MacRumors. If the blog’s previous reports about the iPhone SE 4 following in the iPhone 14’s footsteps prove to be accurate, a larger battery would be necessary to power its larger screen. Apple doesn’t disclose the battery capacities for its phones, but it says the iPhone 14 should get five extra hours of video playback compared to the third-generation iPhone SE. Between the new chip and bigger battery that we’re expecting to find in the next iPhone SE, it sounds like Apple’s next affordable iPhone could see some pretty significant gains in battery life.
Goodbye Touch ID, hello Face ID
Fans of Apple’s Touch ID fingerprint sensor may be out of luck. MacRumors reports that the next iPhone SE will have Face ID, like other modern iPhones, instead of Apple’s fingerprint sensor. That conflicts with Kuo’s report from 2019, which indicated that the next iPhone SE would have a smaller notch area without Face ID and Touch ID embedded in the power button. But since Kuo’s report is about five years old, that information may be outdated.
It may get a 48MP camera, USB-C and Action button
Apple’s next wallet-friendly iPhone may have a few things in common with Apple’s newer iPhones. Since Apple switched to USB-C starting with the iPhone 15 lineup to comply with new European rules, it seems likely that the iPhone SE 4 could ditch the Lightning connector as well. MacRumors also claims the iPhone SE 4 will have USB-C.
The more surprising note in MacRumors’ story is that the iPhone SE 4 could gain the Action button, which is a new key for programming shortcuts that’s currently exclusive to the iPhone 16 family, the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max. If true, it would be another sign that Apple wants to make the Action button standard across the iPhone lineup, coming after it brought the Action button to the standard models this year.
MacRumors also reports that a 48-megapixel single camera could be in store for the next iPhone SE. That would signal another similarity it could share with the iPhone 15 and 16, which also have 48-megapixel main cameras. If the report is accurate, the iPhone SE will only have one rear camera, unlike Apple’s more expensive phones. The regular iPhone 15 has wide and ultra-wide cameras, while the Pro versions have wide, ultra-wide and telephoto cameras.
But Apple introduced the “Fusion” camera on this year’s regular iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus, which it says enables a 2x optical quality zoom despite lacking a dedicated telephoto lens. While reports don’t specify whether the iPhone SE 4 will have this camera, it wouldn’t be surprising if Apple implemented it to compensate for the iPhone SE’s single camera setup.
If the rumors are true, the fourth-generation iPhone SE could bring Apple’s tiny, budget iPhone up to date with the rest of Apple’s lineup. Depending on the price, it could end up being a solid choice for people in need of a more modern iPhone that don’t care about the iPhone 16’s extra flourishes, like the Camera Control button.
Apple’s iPhone 16, 16 Plus Show Off Bolder Colors and Buttons
See all photos
Patrick Holland contributed to this report.
6 things to consider when buying RGB hardware for your PC
If you want your PC to glow like it’s radioactive, the good news is that almost every component in your computer can be found with some level of RGB lighting. That extends to peripherals like keyboards and mice, and also monitors, mousepads, and more. The bad news is that when you prefer form to function, the number of different RGB solutions on the market makes it tricky to plan out your build. You’ll want to check a few things before you start piecing together your parts and building that PC.
Related
6 mistakes to avoid when picking parts for your gaming PC
Selecting the right components for your PC build is always a daunting task. Here are some mistakes to avoid when picking parts for your gaming PC.
6
Compatibility
You’ll need to check for motherboard headers and make sure every cable will fit
While both RGB and ARGB seem to use the same cables and connectors, electrically they are very different. You don’t want to plug them into the wrong header or push two cables in the wrong orientation because you could burn out the LEDs or otherwise damage your components. The differences are as follows:
- RGB: 4-pin header, with all four pins present and uses 12V to power the LEDs. Pins are for power, red, blue, and green.
- ARGB: 4-pin header with one pin blanked out, or sometimes a three-pin header with all three pins present, and uses 5V to power the LEDs. Pins are for power, data, and ground.
It’s not just the headers on the motherboard that you need to consider. Many systems, like those from Corsair, use a hub to link all the RGB or ARGB components together. Then it’s a matter of plugging that hub into power, a USB header, and often a fan header for controlling the PWM signal for speed. The thing to pay attention to here is whether the different hubs will be compatible if you buy a particular manufacturer’s system, as the hubs have changed over the years.
Some companies like Aquacomputer have RGB and ARGB hubs that aren’t manufacturer-specific, but it’s worth checking if the fans you want to use are compatible because some of the components and hubs use proprietary connectors that will only work with that manufacturer’s hardware.
Related
Motherboard headers explained: What they are and how you can use them
Turning you into a motherboard expert
5
Brand consistency
It’s far easier to stick to one brand’s RGB offerings, and the look will be more coherent
The current state of PC RGB is such that proprietary connectors abound, as do control hubs and fans that won’t connect to other systems. But those are only part of the considerations for why it’s just easier to pick components from the same manufacturer’s ecosystem to get a coherent look.
The design language around the lighting will be consistent. You’ll not have to worry about connector issues, and the lighting levels will be similar. Plus, different brands use a different number of LEDs on each component, with the more premium brands using far more LEDs, leading to a better glow. The more budget offerings might only use RGB LEDs, or have few of them on each fan and other component, meaning your desired effect is harder to accomplish.
Related
Proprietary RGB continues to make PC building a mess for beginners and it needs to change
When shopping around for RGB hardware, just what should you buy for your PC?
4
RGB vs ARGB
Do you want colored glow or fine-tuned control over lighting and effects?
PC lighting comes in two varieties these days, since we moved away from cold cathode tubes. While they’re both provided by LEDs that can display multiple colors, they differ in how much control you have over each individual LED in the chain. Those two types are:
- RGB provides Red, Green, and Blue lighting from a single LED, but every light has to be the same color when it’s linked together.
- ARGB provides Addressable Red, Green, and Blue lighting, meaning that every LED can be controlled individually.
The version of ARGB that most people will immediately be familiar with is keyboards with per-key lighting. That’s different to any solid backlit keyboard, as you can change the color behind each key. But the majority of RGB hardware on the market now is ARGB, because companies have decided that more control is better. That is true enough, but it does mean that ARGB components are more expensive because of the added circuitry that’s needed.
Related
ARGB VS RGB: How to choose the right lighting for your PC
While the differences between ARGB and RGB may not seem massive, ARGB can offer a lot more functionality
3
How to control it
Manufacturer software only goes so far, and you have third-party options
To control the lighting in your new glowing PC, you’ll need some software. Very basic effects can be handled by your motherboard’s BIOS firmware, but these are limited to things like breathing and color cycle effects. The BIOS is also handy if you want to turn off all RGB, but that’s another discussion. To get fine-grained controls, you’ll most likely want to stick with the software package that matches the components manufacturer you picked. For example, Corsair has iCUE, and Razer has Synapse.
You’re not limited to first-party software control though. Windows 11 has Dynamic Lighting, which gives you some control, depending on if the fans and other hardware are compatible. Third-party software like SignalRGB can control multiple manufacturer ecosystems but will serve you ads and lock some features unless you sign up for a subscription. And OpenRGB is free works on Windows, macOS, and Linux, but it might not be able to control every device you might want to add.
Related
How to use Dynamic Lighting on Windows 11
Windows 11 has a new feature called Dynamic Lighting to change RGB effects on compatible devices. Here’s how to use it.
2
How it will mesh with your other components
RGB shines when it’s matched with accentuating components and cases
My take on adding RGB lighting is that it’s often harder to figure out which components will look best together than it is to figure out how to control them. Keeping a coherent design language is easier when you stick to one manufacturer’s system, but that’s not always possible or what you feel is the best look.
Things to consider include if you want the lighting to be accent pieces, like on dark components, or if you want your PC awash in color, in which case you want as many white components as possible to provide a backdrop to reflect the light. Some of this also depends on which components you are able to source, since things like graphics cards are often in short supply, and the best looking motherboards might not have all the features you crave.
Related
NZXT H5 Flow RGB (2024) review: Still one of the cleanest mid-tower PC cases
An evolution of one of the greats.
1
Cable routing
RGB and ARGB components double the number of cables you need to hide
While modern motherboards often have headers for both 5V ARGB and 12V RGB, you might only get one or two of each type, or they could be in positions that make it tricky to route cables. Plus, you might run into limitations on how many LEDs each header can support. To get around this, many manufacturers have RGB or ARGB hubs to plug all their cables into, and then one cable to the motherboard for fan control and another cable to a USB header for lighting control.
But even with that solution, adding RGB or ARGB means additional cables between components. For example, you’ll need one signal and power cable for fan control, and another power plus lighting control for the LEDs. This means you’re going to have to route twice as many cables to the control hub, even if you only need to worry about one or two to the motherboard. This can be cramped in smaller cases, or in those that don’t have enough space in the cable management channels on the back of the motherboard tray.
To simplify things somewhat, several brands now have daisy-chainable fans, which either use magnets and pogo pins to connect or very short standard connectors. This makes routing the fans in your build easier, as you only have to worry about one power and one control cable from the line of fans, which can then go to an ARGB hub for easy routing and control.
Related
3 cable management tips to make your gaming PC look its best
Treat your PC to a new look.
RGB lighting can be beautiful with a little bit of planning
Whether you want full-on ARGB glow or a few accent pieces to bring attention to parts of your build, RGB lighting is a popular choice for many PC builders. It’s also one that’s fairly easy to run into issues with, as different manufacturers use competing standards and can run into compatibility issues. But if you keep to individual ecosystems, you can make your PC glow with brilliant light.
ShiftCam SnapSeries roundup: a MagSafe ecosystem
The ShiftCam SnapSeries lineup has evolved to include a more powerful battery pack, a larger studio light, and a much taller tripod — all connected via MagSafe. Here’s how it all fits together.
ShiftCam offers an increasingly varied range of equipment for content creators and photographers that work from iPhone. When I reviewed the original SnapGrip, I was excited by the prospect of an evolving MagSafe accessory ecosystem, and ShiftCam continues to deliver with the latest SnapSeries products.
ShiftCam also offers a lens set for iPhone called LensUltra, which I found to be a strong competitor to other attachable lens options. The iPhone 16 Pro Max is compatible with this set via a new case, so I’ll discuss the set alongside SnapSeries here in this roundup.
There’s a lot going on with ShiftCam and it seems the company is paying close attention to how people use their iPhone to create. The company has also introduced MagSafe SSDs that can snap into place alongside any SnapSeries accessory.
Everything snaps together with magnets, but you may not need or want everything, so here’s how each accessory works and fits in with the rest.
SnapGrip Pro
The SnapGrip Pro is a big update to the original model with a 5,000mAh capacity and Qi2. It’s much more efficient and lets you capture photos and record video much longer.
SnapGrip Pro is a MagSafe battery pack and shutter control for iPhoneConnect directly to the USB-C port for 20W PD charging. It’s much faster than Qi2 and handy when recording high-resolution video that’s draining the battery quickly.
The SnapGrip Pro isn’t just a MagSafe battery though, it’s a Bluetooth shutter that can control the iPhone’s camera. The grip is shaped like a traditional camera grip too, so it helps steady shots.
The iPhone 16 lineup has a dedicated button called Camera Control, but it’s not quite the same as using SnapGrip Pro’s shutter button. There are a lot of swiping and pressing gestures with Camera Control, which can be useful in some situations, but there’s nothing better than an easy-to-press shutter.
Get a better grip while shooting photos and capture with less shake with SnapGrip ProI really like Camera Control, but I tend to use it while holding the iPhone with two hands. It’s a bit fiddly too, so pressing the shutter can sometimes lead to accidentally zooming.
With SnapGrip Pro, you can easily hold the iPhone steady with one hand and press the shutter. It’s really about what function you need, as I find both can exist and have their separate uses.
Get the SnapGrip Pro for $89 from ShiftCam’s website.
SnapStand Max
The 70-inch SnapStand Max is a great portable tripod that collapses to just 11 inches long and uses MagSafe to attach an iPhone. There is a built-in rechargeable shutter button that can be removed from the handle too.
SnapStand Max folds up to fit in your bagThe MagSafe mount head can swivel 200 degrees for whatever angle you need. It’s sturdy enough to hold your iPhone aloft without worrying about sag.
The stand opens with a button at the base of the handle when it’s closed. It telescopes smoothly upwards and can be left at any length securely.
The mount still feels plenty sturdy even if you load it up with accessories like the SnapStudio Light, SnapGrip Pro, and an iPhone. However, be aware of how much weight there is as you extend the tripod, as an uneven surface could cause the entire device to tilt and fall.
The full 70-inch height can get wobbly, especially with other accessories attachedWhen extending the SnapStand Max to its tallest setting, it may be best to limit it to the iPhone and SnapLight. It remains its sturdiest to about 48 inches in length — any taller with more accessories attached, perhaps keep a person holding it steady.
I’m happy that the SnapStand Max can extend to such a tall height. It’s handy for capturing a quick photo or video in some situations. However, that extra length comes at a tradeoff to stability and a slight bump can cause everything to fall over.
Even just setting it to 55 inches increased my confidence in its ability to stand without a wobble by a lot. Like any tall stand like this, it’s important to understand its limits.
The collapsible feet don’t do much to prevent tiltingThe SnapStand Max isn’t like a traditional tripod that has three legs that extend. Instead, it’s got three feet that stay the same size while a neck is extended, which is automatically not as sturdy by design, but you do get a much smaller product when folded up.
All that said, I wouldn’t ask for the stand to be shorter. Users just need to be careful and use their best judgement when setting up.
Get the SnapStand Max for $71.10 from ShiftCam, currently discounted from $79.
SnapStudio Light
The SnapStudio Light is another battery-powered accessory from ShiftCam. It has 10 steps of brightness adjustment up to 440 lumens while on battery or 600 lumens when connected to a power source.
SnapStudio Light offers great lighting options for photos and videoUsers can also control temperature 10 steps between 2,500K and 6,000K. Buttons on the side of the light provide easy access to controls.
The MagSafe mount in the center can be rotated 180 degrees for easy switching between front and back cameras. Attach it to the SnapStand Max for a studio setup, or connect it to the SnapGrip Pro for a portable selfie or vlogging tool.
Like with any ring light, reflections are going to be a problem, especially at a close proximity. You’re going to see the square light in your glasses or even reflected in your eyes unless you’re at a certain distance or angle from the light.
The SnapStudio Light has a center MagSafe mount that can be rotatedThe nice thing about the ShiftCam ecosystem is all of the options for mounting devices. There’s a screw mount on each side that can attach to the included stand or any standard tripod mount.
The internal battery can last about 40 minutes at max brightness. Connect the SnapGrip Pro and wire it to the light to extend its time and available brightness.
Get the SnapStudio Light for $89 from ShiftCam.
ProMic Shotgun and Cold Shoe Mount
If you’re looking to add a little more versatility and universal compatibility, ShiftCam has a cold shoe mount called the SnapShoe. It’s only $29.99 from ShiftCam.
The ProMic Shotgun attaches to the MagSafe SnapShoe mountIf you buy the ShiftCam ProMic Shotgun, it can be set into the SnapShoe. Buy them as a bundle for $109.98 or get the mic alone for $79.99.
The SnapShoe is a great addition because it attaches via MagSafe but allows other accessories outside of the ShiftCam ecosystem to be attached. It’s just a standard cold shoe mount, so bring whatever light or mic you’d like.
The ProMic Shotgun does a great job picking up your voice, and it’s going to be better than your iPhone mic in some situations. That’s especially true since you have the options for different wind filters.
It’s a Super-cardioid mic with a 20Hz to 18kHz frequency response. It works over a standard audio jack and has a second port for connecting headphones.
ProMic Shotgun relies on audio jacks for interfacingYou’re going to need a USB-C to headphone jack adapter to use this mic, so it’s probably not the best choice for modern iPhones. Though, if that’s not an issue, then it’s a good mic.
Perhaps ShiftCam can work on releasing a new version with USB-C connectivity.
SnapMount Camera Case
ShiftCam let me try out its SnapMount Camera Case in addition to its SnapSeries accessories. It’s part of a complete photography or media production package, so I had to put it all together with the LensUltra set.
SnapMount Camera Case with adapters bring LensUltra to iPhone 16 Pro MaxThe new case is made from a really nice textured fabric that’s actually machine washable. It has a cutout for Camera Control and tactile covers for the other buttons.
The lens mounting system changed to something ShiftCam calls an S-mount. It was previously a 12mm thread, so this change is a bit odd considering the LensUltra system still uses that older thread style.
I assume it’s due to a shift in how they want to make lenses in the future. The 12mm mount requires a couple of turns to secure the lens completely, while the S-mount is just a simple twist mechanism that feels secure with a half turn.
The SnapMount Camera Case comes with two S-Mount adaptersThe SnapMount Camera Case ships with two of the S-mount adapters, so that should be enough for users to get by. However, for someone like me that owns the full lens set, I wish I could order more S-mount adapters separately just so I didn’t have to swap the mount between lenses.
The case supports MagSafe charging and works with all the SnapSeries accessories without issue. I like that the case has a nice design and isn’t too bulky, so it can be used as a case regularly without feeling like I need to take it off when not using the lenses.
Get the SnapMount Camera Case for $49.99 from ShiftCam. Be sure to choose your iPhone model from the list.
Using SnapSeries
If you get the SnapSeries Professional Kit and the other accessories mentioned above, they can fit together in interesting ways to accomplish different tasks. Of course, you can snap them all together into a kind of monster MagSafe tower, but it’s likely not very practical.
ShiftCam SnapSeries can be used together for a modular setupSet up to record a video with the stand, light, and microphone, and since you’re likely stationary, use an external power source instead of attaching the MagSafe battery to the already wobbly stack. Use the battery pack when you’re looking to go handheld rather than relying on the stand.
That isn’t to say you can’t connect everything together, but it’s just a little unwieldy. As I’ve said previously, use your best judgement.
I do think it’s really cool that you can pick and choose accessories to snap together for whatever you need at that moment. However, there may be some trial and error in figuring out exactly which order the pieces should go in.
The only way the SnapGrip Pro charges the iPhone is if it is directly attached, but there are situations where you’d want it anyway. For example, place the iPhone in the SnapStudio Light then attach the SnapGrip Pro so you have a grip with a shutter button for taking well-lit selfies.
Take better selfies with SnapGrip Pro and SnapStudio LightTake that setup even further by using a USB-C cable to provide power and increase the SnapStudio Light brightness, or charge the iPhone over cable at 20W.
There are lots of ways to use the SnapSeries magnetic accessories. The kits are the best way to get everything you need, but be warned, you’ll likely keep coming back for more from ShiftCam to improve the versatility of the setup.
Get the SnapSeries Professional Kit with the SnapStudio Light, SnapStand Max, and SnapGrip Pro for $231.30 from ShiftCam, a 10% discount available at publication. The SnapSeries Professional Kit Pro includes everything plus the ProMic Shotgun and SnapShoe for $311.93, also discounted by 10%.
Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2X vs. 2: Every key upgrade
Pick AMOLED or Solar
The Garmin Instinct 3 offers a significant step up over the Instinct 2, but less so for Instinct 2X owners who already have a flashlight, improved solar recharge, and multi-band GPS. The Solar version has absurdly good battery life but the same visual downsides the Instinct series has had for years; the AMOLED version dips to a respectable 18–24 days but has a few extra features to go with the color and resolution.
For
- Instinct 3 Solar beats 2 Solar by over 200 GPS hours
- Instinct 3 AMOLED only model with full-color, high-res display
- Adds highly accurate multi-band GPS, flashlight
- New training tools, sleep coaching, and dozens of sports modes
- Stylish aluminum bezel
Against
- No upgrade to health sensors (aka no ECG, skin temp)
- Instinct 2X Solar already had some of the new upgrades
- No offline maps or new software unique to Instinct lineup
Last-gen quality
The Garmin Instinct 2 blew us away in 2022, and it’s still a data-packed, long-lasting watch with all the Garmin software essentials in 2025. But its solar recharging efficiency isn’t on the same level as the Instinct 3 or 2X, and you may resent the lack of a more accurate GPS mode and the low-contrast, low-res display. The Garmin Instinct 2X falls between the two, being the first to introduce the flashlight, and the main 2X-to-3 gap is for battery life.
For
- Both Instinct 2 and 2X have more than enough battery life for most people
- Same military-grade ruggedness
- Same display resolution, health sensors and 90% of same training tools
Against
- Solar recharge on older models isn’t nearly as efficient
- Minimal memory restricts future feature updates
- No AMOLED option
- No flashlight, gyroscope
- Only offers GPS tracking on 2, no SatIQ on 2X
Comparing the Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2 is more complicated than you’d think. The Garmin Instinct 3 has both AMOLED and MIP Solar versions in multiple sizes, each with a different battery life. The Garmin Instinct 2 and smaller 2S each have solar and non-solar options, and there’s an Instinct 2X that falls in the middle between these two generations.
All three watches are almost unparalleled for battery life — not counting the expensive Garmin Fenix 8 or Enduro 3. The Instinct 3 Solar gives you a 5X boost in solar efficiency over the Instinct 2 Solar, but the gap is smaller for Instinct 2X Solar owners. And even though the Instinct 3 AMOLED has no solar recharge, it may last longer or shorter than the Instinct 2 Solar depending on your lifestyle.
Now you’re starting to see why this guide isn’t so straightforward! But we’ll break down every key difference in hardware, design, software features, and battery life across each version and generation, to help you decide whether to upgrade, stick with your current watch, or buy a last-gen model on sale for a low price.
Our previous guides on the Instinct vs. Instinct 2 guide or Instinct 2 Solar vs. 2X Solar break down last-gen differences for background information. This Instinct 3 vs. Instinct 2X vs. Instinct 2 guide will focus on whether the latest generation is upgraded enough to earn your money!
A brief Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED vs. Solar breakdown
Before I compare the Instinct 3 vs. Instinct 2, I want to highlight key differences between the four Instinct 3 watches.
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCategory
Instinct 3 AMOLED 50mm / 45mm
Instinct 3 Solar 50mm / 45mm
Size
50 x 50 x 14.4 mm; 45 x 45 x 14.9 mm
50 x 50 x 14.4 mm; 45 x 45 x 14.9 mm
Weight
59g / 53g
58g / 52g
Display
1.3-inch (416×416) or 1.2-inch (390×390) full-color AMOLED non-touch
1.1-inch (176×176) or 0.9-inch (176×176) two-window memory-in-pixel non-touch
Memory
4GB
128GB
Battery life
50mm: 24 days (9 AOD), 40 GPS hours, 30 hours multi-band GPS, 86 hours Max Battery GPS, 20 days Expedition GPS; 45mm: 18 days (7 AOD), 32 GPS hours, 23 multi-band GPS hours, 68 hours Max Battery GPS, 16 days Expedition GPS
50mm: 40 days/ Unlimited with solar, 60 GPS hours / 260 with solar, 34 multi-band GPS hours / 60 with solar, 150 hours Max Battery GPS / Unlimited with solar, 60 days Expedition GPS / Unlimited with solar; 45mm: 28 days / Unlimited with solar, 40 GPS hours / 130 with solar, 24 multi-band GPS hours / 40 with solar, 100 hours Max Battery GPS / Unlimited with Solar, 36 days Expedition GPS / Unlimited with Solar
As you can see, the two 45mm models are slightly lighter and thicker than their 50mm counterparts. Both AMOLED watches have the same pixels per inch, while the smaller Instinct 3 Solar has a petite screen with a higher PPI than the 50mm Solar. The larger and smaller watches use 26mm and 22mm bands, respectively, but they should all fit the same wrist sizes.
Either MIP display is much lower-resolution and monocolored, while the AMOLED watches provide a real visual upgrade. They also add perks like on-screen workout animations, always-on display, or images from notifications that the MIP watches can’t offer. But neither AMOLED nor MIP Solar has a touchscreen.
In exchange for a worse visual experience, the Garmin Instinct 3 Solar has fantastic battery recharging capable of stretching standard GPS tracking to last for weeks at a time — longer than the Instinct 3 AMOLED might last with no GPS tracking. Both 45mm Instinct 3 watches have a noticeable dip in battery life compared to their 50mm counterparts; you can see the differences above.
For the following sections, I’ll only include the 50mm Instinct 3 AMOLED and Solar when comparing against the last-gen watches, to make the comparison less cluttered and easier to parse.
Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2X vs. 2: Battery life
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) Swipe to scroll horizontallyBattery category
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin Instinct 2X Solar
Garmin Instinct 2 Solar
Smartwatch mode
24 days
40 days; Unlimited w/ solar
40 days; Unlimited w/ solar
28 days; Unlimited w/ solar
GPS only
40 hours
60 hours; 260 hours w/ solar
60 hours; 145 hours w/ solar
30 hours; 48 hours w/ solar
All satellite systems + multi-band
30 hours
40 hours; 80 hours w/ solar
27 hours; 36 hours w/ solar
N/A
Max Battery GPS
86 hours
150 hours; Unlimited w/ solar
150 hours; Unlimited w/ solar
70 hours; 370 w/ solar
Expedition GPS
20 days
60 days; Unlimited w/ solar
60 days; Unlimited w/ solar
25 days; 105 days w/ solar
Let’s start with the Garmin Instinct series’ trademark perk: Epic battery life. While the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar offered “unlimited” battery life, that was only in the context of never using GPS, using Max Battery mode (one GPS check per minute), or using Expedition mode (one GPS check per hour with no sensors or accessories). The efficiency of the solar panel wasn’t especially strong.
You can see how the Garmin Instinct 3 Solar panel adds 200 estimated GPS hours of tracking, based on whether or not you’re spending at least three hours a day in sunny conditions. Compared to that, the Instinct 2X Solar’s 85 extra hours are respectable but well short; the Instinct 2 Solar’s 18 hours felt significant back in 2022 but barely feels like a blip now.
Where the Instinct 3 Solar especially shines is for multi-band GPS tracking. Because that mode is so power-hungry, the Instinct 2X Solar could only add a few extra hours before it died. The newest model can still double your efficiency while offering the best location data that Garmin has to offer.
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) The Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED barely belongs in the same conversation as these MIP watches, but it’s not as deficient as you might think. Its 40 GPS hours beat the Instinct 2 Solar’s 30-hour estimate, only losing if you spend enough time outdoors in ideal conditions to get the recharge. You can enjoy a much better display and GPS accuracy without having to worry about the weather or hiking in the shade.
Should you upgrade for better battery life? Garmin Instinct 2X Solar buyers probably shouldn’t unless they find a trade-in deal and really need an extra 100+ hours of GPS battery; you’re already getting “unlimited” Max Battery or Expedition mode, so an Instinct 3 upgrade only applies if you need literal days of per-second GPS tracking and don’t have any means of charging your Instinct 2X Solar overnight.
But if you have an older Instinct 1 or 2, your new battery boost will be at a whole other level — or else you can choose the Instinct 3 AMOLED and still get comparable or better battery life.
Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2X vs. 2: Design and display
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCategory
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin Instinct 2X Solar
Garmin Instinct 2 Solar
Materials
Polymer case; aluminum bezel; silicone strap
Polymer case; aluminum bezel; silicone strap
Polymer case; silicone strap
Polymer case; silicone strap
Protection
Chemically strengthened glass; 10ATM; MIL-STD-810
Power glass; 10ATM; MIL-STD-810
Power glass; 10ATM; MIL-STD-810
Power glass; 10ATM; MIL-STD-810
Size
50 x 50 x 14.4 mm, 59g
50 x 50 x 14.4 mm, 58g
50 x 50 x 14.5 mm, 67g
45 x 45 x 14.5 mm, 53g
Display
1.3-inch (416×416) AMOLED
1.1-inch (176×176) MIP
1.1-inch (176×176) MIP
0.9-inch (176×176) MIP
Sensors
Elevate v4 HR, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass, gyroscope
Elevate v4 HR, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass, gyroscope
Elevate v4 HR, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass
Elevate v4 HR, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass
Tracking
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, SatIQ, multi-band GPS
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, SatIQ, multi-band GPS
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, multi-band GPS
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
Connectivity
Bluetooth, ANT+, NFC
Bluetooth, ANT+, NFC
Bluetooth, ANT+, NFC
Bluetooth, ANT+, NFC
LED flashlight
✔️
✔️
✔️
🚫
The changes across the Garmin Instinct series for this latest generation are fairly subtle. The Instinct 2X Solar is slightly heavier, but otherwise they’re about the same size and weight, have the same military-grade durability against thermal, shock, and water damage, connect to the same accessories, and measure the same health data like heart rate, HRV, and blood oxygen.
While everyday people might find the Instinct series ugly — the 2X Solar scored last place in my smartwatch beauty pageant — fans of sporty watches will appreciate its classic look. Garmin gave the Instinct 3 a bit more personality with an aluminum bezel around the display edge that looks striking, especially on the limited-edition models that add color contrast to the bulky, monocolor silicone.
Garmin has given the memory-in-pixel Solar Instincts the same 176 x 176 resolution over the last couple of generations. That said, Garmin upped the visual contrast on the Instinct 2X compared to the Instinct 2, making it more readable, and while I haven’t tested the Instinct 3 Solar myself, I’ve heard that this version is even more readable despite having the same pixels.
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) All non-AMOLED Garmin Instincts have a second window that takes up visual real estate. Some Instinct 3 Solar buyers have complained about the data being misaligned within the circular space, but it’s hard to say how common these manufacturer defects are. The biggest issue is that this window — and the low resolution overall — prevent any possible maps, images, or full-screen graphs. Newer models are more readable, but none are fun to look at outside of workouts!
The Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED has the same size and resolution as the Garmin Forerunner 265, though slightly smaller than the 1.4-inch Venu 3. What’s more relevant is that this display is non-touch, so you’ll still have to rely fully on the Up/ Down buttons to navigate, and there is no map navigation. Still, you can trust me when I say that this upgrade makes the Instinct 3 much easier to read indoors and enables colorful graphs that look dull and blurry on the Instinct 2 or 2X.
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) The Garmin Instinct 2X added multi-band GPS over the GPS-only Instinct 2, matching the Instinct 3 for accuracy. The only difference is that the newer watch has SatIQ mode, which defaults to GPS alone unless the watch encounters signal interference and needs other GNSS or the L5 GPS frequency to pinpoint you. This saves hours of battery life but ensures better accuracy in tough conditions.
This mid-generation watch was also the first Instinct to add a built-in LED flashlight; the brightness is the same on the 2X and 3. It’s good enough in a pinch but won’t replace an actual flashlight or headlamp for night conditions. It burns through a healthy amount of battery, too, so the Instinct 3’s more efficient solar panel might come in handy if you use it a lot.
Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2X vs. 2: Software
Swipe to scroll horizontallyCategory
Garmin Instinct 3
Garmin Instinct 2X
Garmin Instinct 2
Memory
4GB (AMOLED); 128MB (MIP)
64MB
32MB
Sleep & health
Sleep score, sleep coach, nap detection, resting heart rate, breathing rate, Body Battery, all-day stress, HRV status, blood oxygen, health snapshot
Sleep score, resting heart rate, breathing rate, Body Battery, all-day stress, HRV status, blood oxygen, health snapshot
Sleep score, resting heart rate, breathing rate, Body Battery, all-day stress, HRV status, blood oxygen, health snapshot
Smarts
Morning report, weather app, calendar, music playback (no storage), Find My Phone/ Watch, Garmin Messenger app, notification images (AMOLED/ Android only), incident detection, livetrack, live event sharing
Morning report, weather app, calendar, music playback (no storage), Find My Phone/ Watch, incident detection, livetrack
Morning report, weather app, calendar, music playback (no storage), Find My Phone/ Watch, incident detection, livetrack
Key fitness data
Steps, floors, calories, intensity minutes, VO2 Max, auto max HR, daily suggested workouts, training readiness, training status, training effect, training load, training load focus / ratio, running dynamics, advanced cycling dynamics, running power, grade-adjusted pace, performance condition, race glance, improved intervals,
Steps, floors, calories, intensity minutes, VO2 Max, auto max HR, daily suggested workouts, training readiness, training status, training effect, training load, running power, grade-adjusted pace, performance condition
Steps, floors, calories, intensity minutes, VO2 Max, auto max HR, daily suggested workouts, training readiness, training status, training effect, training load, running power, performance condition
The Garmin Instinct 2 shipped with most of the best Garmin Forerunner training tools available at the time, providing enough health and training load to help you become fitter and improve your VO2 Max. The gap between the Garmin Instinct 3 and 2 software isn’t especially wide, but the new watches have more memory, leaving room for new feature updates that the Instinct 2 series will miss out on — and also eliminating some of the noticeable lag on the last-gen watches.
For now, the table above bolds those features that the Instinct 3 has that the 2X and 2 don’t.
For health data, the Instinct 3 can detect naps for enhanced Body Battery data and will provide sleep coaching in your Morning Report. Otherwise, the data is identical, since they all use the same Elevate v4 sensors.
For general smarts, the Instinct 3 Solar isn’t that different, but the AMOLED version will display notification images and (during Garmin Strength Coaching) display visual muscle maps and workout animations. It also has a large font option that the MIP watches lack. Only the Instinct 3 allows family and friends to watch you during a live event, but all the watches have a general LiveTrack tool if you want them to keep an eye on your progress during outdoor excursions.
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) On the training front, serious athletes will appreciate having training load focus, which splits up your recent workouts into low/ high aerobic and anaerobic types so you know what types you need to focus on to improve, as well as your training load ratio comparing this week to past weeks.
If you want to do interval training, only the Instinct 3 shows a rest timer and has improved tools like auto-detected starts and open repeats. The same goes for auto-detecting when your multisport activity has switched to the next type, or for following PacePro guidance.
If you’re a runner or cyclist who wants to analyze your form, the Instinct 3 has wrist-based running dynamics — the Instinct 2 and 2X required a separate pod — and cycling dynamics like Power Phase and right/left balance.
Lastly, Instinct 2 owners will get dozens of new sports modes on the Instinct 3 series: Indoor walking, virtual running, obstacle racing, golfing, disc golf, archery, cyclocross, BMX, water skiing, snorkeling, wakeboarding, wakesurfing, tubing, boating, whitewater, XC skate skiing, ice skating, pickleball, badminton, squash, table tennis, padel, platform tennis, racquetball, basketball, volleyball, field hockey, ice hockey, football/soccer, American football, lacrosse, rugby, ultimate disc, cricket, softball, baseball, boxing, mixed martial arts, motorcycling, overlanding, motocrossing, ATVing, and snowmobiling.
It’s fair to say that most of these sports profiles won’t apply to your lifestyle, but anyone with niche hobbies will find the Instinct 3 more helpful at tracking them.
Garmin Instinct 3 vs. 2X vs. 2: Should you upgrade?
(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central) The Garmin Instinct 3 is an undeniable step up on every other Instinct before it. If you’re deciding between a full-priced Instinct 3 or a discounted Instinct 2, I think perks like the revamped solar charging or AMOLED, multi-band GPS, flashlight, and aluminum bezel make it worth spending full price.
But as I’ve previously written, you can criticize the Instinct 3 Solar for how similar it is to the Instinct 2X aside from the boosted battery life. If you own the Garmin Instinct 2X, I would hold off on buying the Instinct 3, simply because you just spent $450 and you’ll get diminished returns.
The Instinct 3 AMOLED is my preferred choice from a visual perspective, it doesn’t have a trademark skill like the Solar watches’ unlimited battery life. It’s just a rugged, bulky Forerunner 265. If you can accept the lack of a flashy new perk, this is undoubtedly one of the best Garmin watches available.
If you’ve owned an Instinct 1 or 2 for a couple of years, it’s not a bad time to upgrade. Just make sure that you really need that extra Solar battery life, or that you can do without “unlimited” max-battery excursions for a better display.
Two options, both strong
Upgrade to the Garmin Instinct 3 Solar if you’re not satisfied with your current Instinct Solar battery life. Or upgrade to the Instinct 3 AMOLED if you like the series’ durability and aesthetics but want to prevent eye strain and add a little pop of color. Skip this watch if you already have the Instinct 2X Solar.
Last-gen champion
You can buy the Instinct 2 if you find it at a significant discount, but certain aspects like the GPS-only tracking, limited memory, and low-contrast display will age poorly. If you can accept that, we gave this watch a strong review for a reason; if you can’t, consider grabbing the Instinct 3 Solar instead.
I tried a Hi-Res Audio player for the first time – and it’s a game-changer
Getting into hi-res audio can sometimes feel less like looking at a rabbit hole and more like staring into a swirling void – it’s very easy for research to carry you away into a world where the only way to listen to music properly involves spending thousands on the best possible system. Whether you’ve got the budget for that or not, you might want to try things out at a more doable level first.
For the longest time, Astell&Kern wouldn’t be much help there, since even its most affordable digital music players cost a bomb, but it’s re-launched a sub-brand called Activo to help bridge the gap. The Activo P1 digital player is its first hardware in years, and it looks like a pretty superb new music player for the money. I’ve been using it for a few weeks to see if it could turn me into an audiophile overnight.
How much does a Hi-Res Audio player cost, then?
This gets one of the P1’s big boasting points out of the way early doors – it’s available now from a variety of stores, and can picked up for $430 or £399. That makes it about £200 or $200 cheaper than Astell&Kern’s most affordable mainline music player (the SR35).
So, that hardly makes for a truly affordable player, but given how many people use their phones as music sources, it’s likely that most people shopping for a standalone player will be impressed by that price compared to much of the competition.
Divisive but stark design
Is a dedicated audio player worth carrying around?
(Image credit: Future)
The Activo P1 is clearly intended to look clean and simple, rather than fussy and technical, and it largely succeeds in that aim. Activo only offers the P1 in a single colour, white with silver aluminium, and the overall impression in the hand is a little like if an iPod Classic got the iPod Touch’s screen grafted onto its front.
The front of the player is all screen, with a disappointingly chunky bezel at the bottom. Turning the player over reveals a two-tone back. The lower two-thirds of the P1 is of clean brushed aluminium, but the top third is sturdy white plastic, jutting out a little with an embossed logo.
Whether you like how it looks is a matter of taste – and I’m honestly still a little torn. I like its simplicity and the little shelf provided by the white plastic bump is actually comfortable for holding the player. Equally, the plastic sections don’t feel all that high quality, and a harsh view would be that there’s something a little generic about the whole thing.
(Image credit: Future)
On the left side of the player, there are pleasingly tactile volume keys, while the right side houses a power and menu button pairing. The top of the device offers up both a 3.5mm unbalanced and a 4.4mm balanced wired connection, while the bottom has a USB-C charging port and a slot for your microSD card of choice.
You will probably end up putting a microSD card in, as I’ll get to, and doing so is fairly easy, although I don’t love how the card still pokes out by a tiny amount when fully inserted. It underlines the fact that this isn’t the sort of player I’d want to use in the rain, or in any conditions where it might get damaged.
What features does the Activo P1 offer?
(Image credit: Future)
A player like this lives and dies by the features and codecs it supports, of course, and this is probably where Activo most hopes to win people over with its pricing structure. The P1 uses a ES9219Q SABRE Dual-DAC and has a built-in amplifier system – the Astell & Kern Teraton Alpha.
That’s important because the Teraton Alpha is the same system that A&K puts in even far more expensive players that it offers, not just the step-up SR35. So, you’re quantifiably getting a pretty sophisticated amplifier in a demonstrably less expensive player.
You get dual-band Wi-Fi support, and Bluetooth 5.3 with support for wide range of wireless codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX HD and LDAC are all catered for. When it comes to playing files, it has native support for basically every file type you could find: WAV, FLAC, WMA, MP3, OGG, APE, AAC, ALAC, AIFF, DFF, DSF and MQA will all work, while files of up to 32-bit/384-kHz and DSD256 resolution are supported.
(Image credit: Future)
That’s a bit of a salad of acronyms, but the key point is that if you have a library comprised of any of those file types, it’ll work seamlessly on the P1 using its built-in software. This runs on Android and is extremely easy to navigate through, with simple controls and a lot of customisation options at your fingertips.
You can also use the Play Store to download hi-res streaming apps, and I found it extremely straightforward to download Apple Music and take advantage of its lossless streaming. Downloads work fine, too, and this should be the same across the likes of Tidal, Qobuz, Spotify and others).
(Image credit: Future)
Intriguingly, the P1 can also be plugged into your computer via the USB-C cable to act as a wired DAC for it, which is a use-case that I can’t imagine that many people will exploit. Still, it’s a nice bonus for budding musicians, DJs or enthusiasts. File transfers are a little fiddly at times, though – my M3 MacBook Pro wouldn’t let me access the P1’s files no matter what I tried, using the included transfer cables and others, so I had to use a microSD card instead.
The P1 gets around 20 hours of battery on a single charge, which I’d rank as very solid for this sort of player. That said, it’s a little slow to recharge, taking at nearly a couple of hours to power back up to full, which could cramp your style if you’re not an organised recharger.
Is Hi-Res Audio truly better?
(Image credit: Future)
When you get your hands on audiophile gear after a period of using your phone and some wireless earbuds, the hope is that your favourite music will sound radically different. Lossless streaming has narrowed the gap compared to a few years ago, but there’s no doubt that the Activo P1 sounds pretty phenomenal compared to the standard streaming experience.
I tested using wired and wireless earbuds – the excellent Technics EAH-AZ100 for wireless playback and Activo’s own new Q1 IEM earbuds on the wired front (they’ll get their own review very soon). I used a variety of file types, including MP3 and FLAC files of songs that I know inside and out. I also used Apple Music to stream hi-res lossless tracks and downloaded a variety of albums to see how they held up when saved. In pretty much every case, I was really pleased with the results.
I always head to Justice’s debut album for low-end bass testing, and the P1 was able to summon up the crunchy detail in its glitchy, distorted layers perfectly. The duo’s later work has a wider stage, and the player similarly has the scope to really make it shine. Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, meanwhile, had the depth and eclectic noise that I’d hoped for, but with the detail to let me pick out the many individual parts throughout a varied album.
(Image credit: Future)
The difference when moving from AAC over wireless audio to a balanced 4.4mm wired FLAC experience is noticeable, too, with songs gaining that extra bit of verve and power that really elevates things. The highs are detailed and piquant, the lows roll nicely without blowing things out, and you’ll be able to hear the mids with extreme clarity – what more could you want?
That choice between wireless audio and wired excellence does mean there’s a bit of “your mileage may vary” to account for here – after all, every audiophile knows that a good player is pointless if paired with the cheapest earbuds you can find. Still, the flexibility offered by the P1 is a key selling point. It can just as easily accompany you on a train journey with your choice of travel earbuds as it can with a fireside evening of quiet solo listening in a controlled environment with the best headphones you can buy.
The P1 is also fairly snappy to use and really intuitive. Activo’s own player is responsive and stripped-back in a way that really did remind me of using an iPod in the best way. Its processor ensures that the device doesn’t really lag, even if it’s palpably not as responsive as one of the best phones available right now. If I have one hesitation to share it’s that it does get pretty warm in regular use, and downright hot when recharging.
Will I keep listening?
(Image credit: Future)
The Activo P1 feels like a device that accomplishes exactly what Astell&Kern was hoping for. It offers an immediate and more entry-level option for those looking to dip their toes into audiophile-grade tech, without compromising much at all in terms of quality.
It also establishes Activo as a brand (or sub-brand) to pay attention to over the next few years, and it’ll be fascinating to see how it positions itself in the market as time goes on. If you’re looking to see what a dedicated digital player can do for your music, this is a brilliant place to start – and it might prove something of a gateway drug.
What is Starlink? How to get the satellite service for free on your phone with T-Mobile, plus everything you need to know
There’s never a good time to find yourself with no mobile reception. Whether you want to look up directions on Google Maps, send someone a WhatsApp message, or just want to post a beautiful view on Instagram: zero bars on your smartphone won’t get you very far. That’s where satellite services like Starlink come in – and this week T-Mobile started offering it for free (ahead of a paid rollout) in the US on compatible smartphones.
The network operator has teamed up with SpaceX to launch the “first and only space-based mobile network” in the US, bringing cell phone service to remote areas via satellite. Powered by Starlink, it’s set to change the game for mobile users in rural locations. Those users won’t have to wait long to access it, either: the beta trial is already underway and a full rollout is scheduled for July this year.
What’s more, access isn’t limited to T-Mobile customers. The carrier has made its new service available to both AT&T and Verizon users as well, provided that their phone supports an eSIM. Want to upgrade your coverage with the groundbreaking satellite-to-cell service? We’ve broken down everything you need to know about T-Mobile Starlink, including how you can get it and how much it costs.
A New Era in Connectivity – T-Mobile Starlink – YouTube
Watch OnWhat is Starlink and how does it work?
- Starlink is a subsidiary of Elon Musk’s SpaceX
- It operates a constellation of small internet satellites
- Direct-to-cell satellites work like cell towers in space
Starlink is a subsidiary of SpaceX, the space exploration company owned by Elon Musk. Starlink owns and operates a constellation of thousands of small satellites. It has been launching these compact satellites into space since 2019. They are used primarily to serve high-speed internet to Starlink customers with a compatible antenna on the ground.
Unlike traditional satellite internet services, Starlink’s satellites circle the planet in a low-Earth orbit. This closer proximity to the Earth’s surface helps to reduce the lag – or latency – experienced as data is relayed between a user’s antenna and the orbiting satellite. Because of the high number of Starlink satellites, the system is also able to offer global coverage, reaching areas beyond the scope of standard broadband or fibre optic connectivity. This makes it a particularly useful service in rural locations.
Early last year, SpaceX started launching Starlink satellites equipped with direct-to-cell capabilities. These satellites have modems on-board which function the same as cellphone towers. No special antenna or other hardware is required to connect to them: they are seen by your smartphone as standard cell towers, albeit up in space.
This means active users can access Starlink coverage wherever they can see the sky. If a phone supports LTE, it can connect to Starlink’s satellite-based network the same as if it’s a normal terrestrial provider.
Starlink on phones: how does T-Mobile’s new mobile service work?
- T-Mobile’s Starlink service is powered by SpaceX satellites
- Free public beta testing launched in February
- Paid subscriptions available from July for T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon users
T-Mobile’s new service is powered by Starlink satellites which are equipped for direct-to-cell connectivity. According to T-Mobile, 451 of these satellites have been launched so far. As above, these work like cell towers in space. Wherever you can see the sky, compatible smartphones can connect to T-Mobile Starlink as if it’s a normal mobile network. No additional hardware or antenna is needed.
That means whenever you’re in an area without cell service, your smartphone will connect automatically to Starlink satellites. T-Mobile reckons that more than 500,000 square miles of the US is currently beyond the reach of any carrier’s standard cell towers. Its new service should eliminate those mobile dead zones, allowing users to stay connected wherever they are in the US.
T-Mobile launched the free public beta test of its Starlink service during the Super Bowl on February 9 2025. It’s open for anyone on any US carrier to sign up, including customers of both Verizon and AT&T. Registered users will be given access on a rolling basis, to provide feedback before the full rollout in summer.
In July, T-Mobile Starlink will switch to a paid version. It will be included free for anyone on T-Mobile’s Go5G Next plan. Other T-Mobile customers can access it as a paid add-on for $15 a month. Anyone who registers for the beta in February will also be offered an Early Adopter Discount, bringing the price down to $10 a month.
Verizon and AT&T customers will also be able to continue using the T-Mobile Starlink service once it switches to a paid version, as will users of any wireless network with an unlocked eSIM phone. This will cost $20 a month and users will need to activate a second eSIM in their phone to access the network.
At launch, the service only supports text messaging when connected to the satellite network. T-Mobile states that voice and data will be added soon, although this will require government approval for SpaceX to use the full bandwidth capacity of its satellite constellation.
Mark Rober Texts His Dad From a Satellite | T-Mobile – YouTube
Watch OnStarlink on iPhone: how do you get it?
- T-Mobile Starlink works on most modern smartphones
- Apple iPhone 14 models and later are supported
- iPhones need to be running iOS 18.3 to access Starlink
The only way to get Starlink on an iPhone at present is to sign up to the T-Mobile beta test. To do that, you’ll need to have an iPhone 14, iPhone 15 or iPhone 16. That includes the Plus, Pro & Pro Max variants. You’ll also need to be running iOS version 18.3.
Contrary to TikTok rumors, iOS 18.3 does not secretly install Starlink tech on your iPhone. What it does is make the network settings changes necessary to allow your phone to connect to T-Mobile 1900Mhz spectrum.
You’ll then need to register for the T-Mobile beta. Once you’re approved to participate and you head somewhere outside of standard cellular range, your phone should automatically access network coverage via the Starlink satellite constellation. When it does, you’ll see “SAT” instead of the standard bars in the top right corner of your iPhone.
It’s not just Apple iPhone users who can access the public beta. According to T-Mobile, Starlink “works on most smartphones from the last four years.” While no additional hardware or accessory is required to connect to the Starlink network, T-Mobile does state that smartphones need to be “satellite optimized” for users to have the best experience.
T-Mobile says it has worked with both Apple and Google to “ensure that this experience is integrated directly into their OS.” Whatever phone you have, T-Mobile states that it “needs to be on the latest software to use T-Mobile Starlink.”
The official list of supported handsets is as follows:
- Apple iPhone 14 and later (including Plus, Pro & Pro Max)
- Google Pixel 9 (including Pro, Pro Fold, & Pro XL)
- Motorola 2024 and later (including razr, razr+, edge and g series)
- Samsung Galaxy A14, A15, A16, A35, A53, A54
- Samsung Galaxy S21 and later (including Plus, Ultra and Fan Edition)
- Samsung Galaxy X Cover6 Pro
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and later
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and later
- REVVL 7 (including Pro)
This list is expected to grow as public beta testing continues, with more handsets likely to be supported by the time that the T-Mobile Starlink service rolls out for general usage in July. Whether older Apple smartphones, such as the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13, will be included isn’t clear.
Starlink Mini: what is Starlink’s backpack-friendly version?
- Starlink Mini is a compact antenna kit that connects to SpaceX satellites
- The kit costs $499 / £399 / AU$599 up-front
- It’s different from T-Mobile’s Starlink service
Starlink Mini is a different way to access the internet via SpaceX’s Starlink satellite constellation. It’s a portable antenna kit with a built-in Wi-Fi router. It allows you connect to high-speed, low-latency satellite internet almost anywhere in the world with a clear view of the sky.
It’s different from T-Mobile’s Starlink service. With T-Mobile, users connect to Starlink’s direct-to-cell satellites using their smartphone. The satellites work like standard cell towers. With Starlink Mini, the antenna kit receives signal from SpaceX’s Starlink internet satellites. It then creates a Wi-Fi network at ground level using a built-in router, which other devices can connect to.
This setup makes it more versatile than the T-Mobile service, as you can connect to the Starlink Mini’s Wi-Fi network on a range of devices, not just your smartphone. What’s more, Starlink Mini supports peak download speeds in excess of 100Mbps.
(Image credit: Starlink) Designed to be used on the move, the backpack-friendly Starlink Mini measures 430 x 334 x 79mm and weighs 6.73kg. It ships with a kickstand and power supply, as well as a pipe adapter for pole mounting. Setup is as simple as plugging it in and pointing it at the sky. You can use the Starlink app to find optimal installation locations.
The Starlink Mini kit costs $499 / £399 / AU$599 up-front. In addition to the one-off cost of the kit itself, you’ll need take out a Starlink subscription to access roaming internet. There’s a 50GB Roam package for $50 / £50 / AU$80 per month.
Alternatively, you can get the Roam Unlimited package with unlimited data for a monthly cost of $165 / £96 / AU$195. Subscriptions can be paused at any time. Coverage isn’t yet global, but it is offered in more than 100 markets.
Subaru Starlink: what is it?
- Subaru Starlink is a suite of connected in-car services
- It is completely separate form SpaceX’s Starlink system
- It relies on standard cellular connectivity, not satellites
Despite its name, Subaru Starlink has nothing to do with SpaceX satellites. Subaru Starlink is a package of connected in-car services available on most new Subaru vehicles. It includes a suite of safety, security and remote access features, such as automatic collision notifications, enhanced roadside assistance and remote ignition.
In-car connectivity is via standard cellular networks, rather than satellites. If you’re outside of cell tower range, your vehicle won’t be able to access Subaru Starlink services.
Most supported Subaru vehicles come with a complimentary three-year trial of the system, after which it’s available for an additional fee. There’s no longer a standalone Starlink app, as the features have been rolled into the MySubaru app. The features available vary from model to model.
(Image credit: Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Starlink price: what’s the monthly cost for Starlink?
- T-Mobile’s Starlink service starts at $15 per month for T-Mobile customers
- Users of other carriers will be able to use T-Mobile Starlink for $20 a month
- A Starlink Mini Roam subscription starts at $50 / £50 / AU$80 per month
The cost of Starlink depends on how you access it. Once T-Mobile Starlink rolls out to the general public in the US in July, it will be available to T-Mobile customers as an add-on for $15 a month. Users who take out a subscription during the public beta will be entitled to an Early Adopter Discount, bringing the price down to $10 a month.
Customers of other wireless carriers will be able to access T-Mobile’s direct-to-cell service for $20 a month. There is no up-front cost, but they will need an unlocked smartphone with a spare eSIM slot.
Alternatively, you can access satellite internet with a direct subscription to Starlink. Rather than using a smartphone, you will need to purchase a Starlink antenna kit, then take out a monthly data subscription.
The cheapest kit is the portable Starlink Mini (see above) which costs $499 / £399 / AU$599 up-front. The 50GB Roam package costs $50 / £50 / AU$80 per month, while Roam Unlimited is priced at $165 / £96 / AU$19 per month.
If you want a more permanent solution, the Starlink Standard kit costs $249 / £299 / AU$549. Residential service costs at $120 / £75 / AU$139 per month for unlimited data.
You might also like…
Windows 10 Insider Previews: A guide to the builds
Microsoft never sleeps. In addition to its steady releases of major and minor updates to the current version of Windows 10, the company frequently rolls out public preview builds to members of its Windows Insider Program, allowing them to test out — and even help shape — upcoming features.
Although Windows Insiders can choose to receive Windows 11 preview builds in one of four channels — the Canary, Dev, Beta, or Release Preview Channel — Microsoft currently offers Windows 10 Insider previews in the Beta and Release Preview Channels only.
The Release Preview Channel typically doesn’t see action until shortly before a new feature update is rolled out; it’s meant for final testing of an upcoming release and is best for those who want the most stable builds. The Beta Channel previews features that are a little further out.
Below you’ll find information about recent Windows 10 preview builds. For each build, we’ve included the date of its release, which Insider channel it was released to, a summary of what’s in the build, and a link to Microsoft’s announcement about it.
Note: If you’re looking for information about updates being rolled out to all Windows 10 users, not previews for Windows Insiders, see “Windows 10: A guide to the updates.”
Releases for Windows 10 version 22H2
Windows 10 Build 19045.5552 (KB5052077)
Release date: February 13, 2025
Released to: Release Preview Channel
This build fixes a variety of bugs, including one in which Open Secure Shell (OpenSSH) refused to start, stopping SSH connections.
(Get more info about Build 19045.5552.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.5435 (KB5050081)
Release date: January 17, 2025
Released to: Release Preview Channel
This update introduces a new calendar and the new Outlook app. It also fixes a variety of bugs, including one that depleted virtual memory, causing some apps to fail, and another in which the Capture Service and Snipping Tool stopped responding you pressed Windows key + Shift + S several times while Narrator was on.
(Get more info about Build 19045.5435.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.5194 (KB5046714)
Release date: November 14, 2024
Released to: Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel
For Windows Insiders in the Beta Channel, the recommended section of the Start menu will show some Microsoft Store apps from a small set of curated developers. If you want to turn this off, go to Settings > Personalization > Start. Turn off the toggle for Show suggestions occasionally in Start. Note that this feature is being rolled out gradually.
Windows Insiders in the Beta and Release Preview Channels get several bug fixes, including for a bug in which when you dragged and dropped files from a cloud files provider folder, it might have resulted in a move instead of a copy.
(Get more info about Build 19045.5194.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.5070 (KB5045594)
Release date: October 14, 2024
Released to: Beta and Release Preview Channels
In this build, those in the Beta Channel who have chosen to get features as soon as they are rolled out get new top cards that highlight key hardware specifications of their devices.
Insiders in both the Beta and Release Preview Channels get a new account manager on the Start menu. The new design makes it easy to view your account and access account settings. Those in the Beta and Release Preview Channels also get fixes for a variety of bugs, including one in which a scanner driver failed to install when you used a USB cable to connect to a multifunction printer.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.5070.)
Windows 10 22H2 19045.4955 (KB5043131)
Release date: September 16, 2024
Released to: Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel
This build fixes several bugs, including one in which playback of some media could have stopped when you used certain surround sound technology, and another in which Windows Server stopped responding when you used apps like File Explorer and the taskbar.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4955.)
Windows 10 22H2 19045.4842 (KB5041582)
Release date: August 22, 2024
Released to: Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel
This build fixes several bugs, including one in which when a combo box had input focus, a memory leak sometimes occurred when you closed that window, and another in which some Bluetooth apps stopped responding because of a memory leak in a device.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 19045.4842.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4713 (KB5040525)
Release date: July 11, 2024
Released to: Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel
In this build, Insiders in the Beta Channel get a fix in which they will see a search box on their secondary monitors when the setting for search on the taskbar is set to “Search box.”
Insiders in the Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel get fixes for a variety of bugs, including one in which the TCP send code often causes a system to stop responding during routine tasks, such as file transfers. This issue leads to an extended send loop.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 19045.4713.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4593
Release date: June 13, 2024
Released to: Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel
In this build, Insiders in the Beta Channel get bug fixes for Windows Backup. Insiders in both the Beta and Release Preview Channels get a new feature for mobile device management in which when you enroll a device, the MDM client sends more details about the device. The MDM service uses those details to identify the device model and the company that made it.
Insiders in the Beta Channel and Release Preview Channel also get a variety of bug fixes, including for a bug that could have stopped systems from resuming from hibernation after BitLocker was turned on.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 19045.4593.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4472 (KB5037849)
Release date: May 20, 2024
Released to: Release Preview ChannelThis build fixes a variety of bugs, including one in which TWAIN drivers stopped responding when you used them in a virtual environment, and another in which the Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) app stopped responding.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 19045.4472.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4353 (KB5036979)
Release date: April 15, 2024
Released to: Release Preview Channel
This build introduces account-related notifications for Microsoft accounts in Settings > Home. A Microsoft account connects Windows to your Microsoft apps. This feature displays notifications across the Start menu and Settings. You can manage your Settings notifications in Settings > Privacy & security > General.
A wide variety of bugs have been fixed, including one in which when your device resumed from Modern Standby you might have gotten the stop error, “0x9f DRIVER_POWER_STATE_FAILURE, and another in which the Windows Local Administrator Password Solution’s (LAPS) Post Authentication Actions (PAA) did not happen at the end of the grace period. Instead, they occurred at restart.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4353.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4233 (KB5035941)
Release date: March 14, 2024
Released to: Release Preview Channel
This build adds Windows Spotlight, which displays new images as your desktop wallpaper. If you want to know more about an image, click or tap the Learn More button, which takes you to Bing. To turn on this feature, go to Settings > Personalization > Background > Personalize your background and choose Windows spotlight. The update also adds sports, traffic, and finance content to the lock screen. To turn it on, go to Settings > Personalization > Lock screen. Note that these two features will roll out to users gradually.
In addition, in Windows Hello for Business IT admins can now use mobile device management (MDM) to turn off the prompt that appears when users sign in to an Entra-joined machine. To do it, turn on the “DisablePostLogonProvisioning” policy setting. After a user signs in, provisioning is off for Windows 10 and Windows 11 devices.
A wide variety of bugs have been fixed, including one in which some applications that depend on COM+ component had stopped responding. Also fixed was a deadlock issue in CloudAP that occurred when different users signed in and signed out at the same time on virtual machines.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4233.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4116 (KB5034843)
Release date: February 15, 2024
Released to: Release Preview Channel
In this build, using Windows share, you can now directly share URLs to apps like WhatsApp, Gmail, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Sharing to X (formerly Twitter) is coming soon.
The build fixes several bugs, including one in which you weren’t able to use Windows Hello for Business to authenticate to Microsoft Entra ID on certain apps when using Web Access Management (WAM).
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.4116.)
Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.3992 (KB5034203)
Release date: January 11, 2024
Released to: Release Preview Channel
This update adds eye control system settings. You can back up these settings from the former device while you set up a new device. Then those settings will install automatically on the new device so you can use them when you reach the desktop.
The build fixes a wide variety of bugs, including one in which an MDM service such as Microsoft Intune might not get the right data from BitLocker data-only encryption, and another in which some single-function printers are installed as scanners.
(Get more info about Windows 10 22H2 Build 19045.3992 (KB5034203).)
Best laptops for video editing 2025: Reviewed and ranked
If you do any video editing work, you probably know how taxing it can be on your laptop. So, when browsing for a laptop for video editing, you’ll want to make sure your rig is suited up with the proper hardware.
Depending on your work load, you may not need a top-tier machine to get the job done. That said, a gaming laptop may not be the right choice, especially one with a lower resolution display. A powerful processor and graphics are a given, but you’ll need to take other factors into consideration such as the quality of the display and port selection.
Why you should trust us: PCWorld has been covering PCs since 1983, and reviews more than 70 notebooks a year in our never-ending quest to find the best laptops. Our expert reviewers evaluate every machine using a combination of performance benchmarks and rigorous usability standards, with an eye toward identifying the best laptops for specific needs and at various price points. We also edit lots of videos ourselves, with the results appearing on PCWorld’s YouTube channel. Take a look at our top picks for video editing below, followed by buying advice and more details about our testing process.
If you’re on a budget or just looking to save some money, you may also want to check out our daily roundup of the best laptop deals to scope out any discounts on content creation notebooks.
The best laptops for video editing
Asus ProArt P16 – Best laptop for video editing
Pros
- Big touchpad with virtual scroll wheel
- Gorgeous 4K OLED display
- More connectivity than the competition
- Good battery life
Cons
- Chassis is light, but doesn’t look remarkable
- CPU performance falls behind the best
- Can get hot under load
Price When Reviewed:
$2,299.99Why we like the Asus ProArt P16
The Asus ProArt P16 is a phenomenal choice for creative professionals and prosumers because of its stunning 4K OLED display, diverse selection of connectivity options, and long battery life. The 16-inch 3840×2400 display “boasts an incredible color gamut and deep contrast,” according to our review. It also has a taller 16:10 aspect ratio, which is great for multitasking and productivity tasks alike.
You’ll find the following ports on this machine: two USB-C, two USB-A, one HDMI, a crucial SD card reader, and a 3.5mm audio combo jack. One of the USB-C ports even supports USB 4.0, which is capable of transmitting up to 40 Gbps. This machine also lasted over nine hours on a single charge. That’s a pretty good result given the powerful hardware inside.
Who should buy the Asus ProArt P16
Serious content creators! The display alone is an “excellent choice for a laptop aimed at professional creatives and consumers,” according to our review (which was written by a content creator). The resolution is great when editing high resolution photos. Although it can run hot under heavier loads and the overall look is on the boring side, it’s still worth your consideration, especially if you need the sharpness of a 4K display.
Read our full
Asus ProArt P16 review
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra – Best laptop for video editing (if you don’t need 4K)
Pros
- Fantastic battery life
- Solid GPU performance
- Gorgeous OLED screen that can be used outdoors
- Great audio
- AI-powered Core Ultra inside
Cons
- Chargers keep getting bigger
- Still not a great keyboard
Price When Reviewed:
$2999.99Why we like the Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra offers powerful performance as well as a gorgeous OLED display. Thanks to the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H CPU and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 GPU, it’s well equipped to handle any video editing task you throw at it. Plus, the 16-inch OLED display has a resolution of 2880×1800 and a refresh rate of 120Hz–so you can expect a crisp-looking picture with rich colors. Sure, it’s not 4K, but it’s still a fantastic screen for content creation. Battery life is absolutely absurd, too. This machine lasted a whopping 18 hours and 54 minutes on a single charge. Wall outlet? Who is she?
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Anyone looking for a powerful, long-lasting laptop and doesn’t need to edit 4K videos. In addition to the stunning OLED display and the long battery life, the audio is also quite punchy, sounding great up and down the audio range. If you switch on the Dolby Atmos feature, you’ll hear even richer sound. Though content creators may not necessarily need good audio (or likely use dedicated headphones), it’s still a nice perk.
Alternative option: The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i ($1,699.99) is another great laptop to consider. It comes decked out with a 16-inch 3200×2000 165Hz refresh rate display, 32GB of RAM, and tons of ports (including an SD card reader). Compared to our current pick, the Yoga Pro 9i has a sharper screen with a faster refresh rate. That said, it only managed nine hours on a single charge. It’s an acceptable result, but it’s nothing like the Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra’s 18 hours and 54 minutes.
Read our full
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra review
Asus ProArt PX13 – Best ultraportable laptop for video editing
Pros
- Excellent multithreaded CPU performance
- Beautiful OLED display
- Discrete Nvidia GPU for creative tasks
- Weighs just 3.04 pounds
Cons
- Lower battery life than a Snapdragon X laptop
- Fans can be loud
- No Copilot+ PC AI features at launch
Price When Reviewed:
$1,699Why we like the Asus ProArt PX13
The Asus ProArt PX13 is a creators laptop, full stop. It comes with the latest AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 GPU, 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of SSD storage — in other words, it’s powerful with a capital P. In addition to the impressive internal components, it also has a 13.4-inch 1880p OLED display with touchscreen and stylus support as well as a lightweight form factor. In fact, it weighs just 3.04 pounds, making it a fantastic option for those who are always on-the-go. Other cool features include Wi-Fi 7 connectivity and a 1080p webcam.
Who should buy the Asus ProArt PX13
Anyone that needs a portable powerhouse for creative work, and doesn’t need a 4K display (or is willing to connect the laptop to a 4K monitor). If you commute into the office, you can easily toss this laptop into a bag and be on your merry way. It also has a lot of connectivity options, which is useful for video editors that need to offload their work. The port selection includes two USB Type-C, one USB Type-A, one combo audio jack, one HDMI 2.1, one microSD reader, and one power in. The ProArt PX13 also has a 360-degree hinge, which allows you to use it like a tent or lie it flat on a surface.
Read our full
Asus ProArt PX13 review
Acer Nitro V 16 – Best budget laptop for video editing
Pros
- Solid performance
- Competitive price
- Dedicated button for quick performance mode switching
- Fast 165Hz display with good colors
Cons
- Fully plastic build
- Mushy keyboard
- Weak battery life
Price When Reviewed:
$1,099.99Why we like the Acer Nitro V 16
The Acer Nitro V 16 is an affordable gaming laptop with competitive hardware and a big, fast display. The 1920×1200 IPS display measures 16 inches with a refresh rate of 165Hz, which means you can expect smooth-looking visuals. It also comes with an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 GPU, so it definitely has enough horsepower to handle more demanding editing tasks. The battery life isn’t the best (four hours on a single charge), but that’s not surprising given that this is a gaming laptop and they’re known for their power-sucking components. If you don’t mind staying parked at your desk, then the Acer Nitro V 16 is a good pick for video editors looking to save some cash.
Who should buy the Acer Nitro V 16
Video editors looking for an affordable laptop with discrete graphics. It’s a good value, full stop. For just under a grand, you’re getting powerful hardware as well as a high refresh rate display. The battery life is shorter than we like to see, but this may not be a deal-breaker for you, so long as you stay parked at a desk. The gamer aesthetic is on the flashier side, too. If you can live with those trade-offs, then you can’t really beat the price-to-performance value.
Alternative option: The Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition ($1,099.99), which was our previous Best Budget Laptop for Video Editing pick, is still a good option to consider. For about a grand, you’re getting reliable graphics performance, a spacious keyboard, and long battery life.
Read our full
Acer Nitro V 16 review
Apple MacBook Pro (M3, Pro) – Best MacBook for video editing
Pros
- Good performance
- 18GB of RAM
- Runs quiet
Cons
- Low performance advantage over M2 Pro
Price When Reviewed:
$1,999 – discontinuedWhy we like the Apple MacBook Pro (M3, Pro)
The Apple MacBook Pro (M3, Pro) will kick you in the teeth with its power (in the best way possible). Inside, you’ll find a 14-core GPU as well as 18GB of RAM and 512GB of SSD storage. That amount of RAM will keep things running nice and smooth while the beefy GPU will chew right through any intense edits, though intense video editors will want to upgrade to a model with more storage or invest in an external SSD for added capacity. The 14.2-inch Liquid Retina XDR display also has a ridiculously high resolution of 3024×1964, so editing should be a delightful experience. It even comes with three Thunderbolt 4 ports for speedy data transfers.
Who should buy the Apple MacBook Pro (M3, Pro)
Anyone who prefers Apple’s ecosystem. This configuration shows a 44 percent increase in performance (according to Geekbench’s Compute Metal test) compared to the M3 (sans Pro) model. You’ll also be able to see every detail of your photo or video editing work thanks to the gorgeous Liquid Retina XDR display. Battery life isn’t too shabby, either. The M3 Pro MacBook Pro will last you over ten hours on a single charge, which is more than a full work day.
Alternative option: If you’re looking for a bigger screen, then you should check out the MacBook Pro, M2 Pro. The Liquid Retina XDR display measures 16.2-inches and has a resolution of 3456×2234, so visuals should be sharp as knives. The M2 Pro also comes loaded with a powerful 19-core GPU.
Read our full
Apple 14-inch MacBook Pro (M3 Pro, 2023) review
Recent laptop reviews
- Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro: The Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro delivers incredible battery life, a beautiful display, and solid desktop performance. But for an extra $50, you could have this as a 2-in-1 machine with a bundled S Pen.
- Acer Swift 16 AI: The Acer Swift 16 AI is a capable machine with a big, beautiful screen, but its AI chops are still unproven.
- Lenovo Legion 5i: The Lenovo Legion 5i is a great value — a 16-inch gaming laptop with a screaming-fast CPU that also squeezes a surprising amount of performance from its GPU.
- Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition: The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition has elegance and feels great to use. But Lenovo should have stepped up its game, as the system lags behind in performance and battery next to a bunch of cheaper competitors, and Lenovo’s not the only brand making great-feeling systems.
- Lenovo LOQ 15: The Lenovo LOQ15 has better build quality than the average gaming laptop in this price range, but its performance is still on the low side.
How we tested
The PCWorld team puts each and every Windows laptop through a series of benchmarks that test GPU and CPU performance, battery life, and so on. The idea is to push the laptop to its limits and then compare it against others we’ve tested. Chromebooks, on the other hand, go through a series of web-based tests. It wouldn’t be fair or possible to run the same kinds of tests on a Chromebook, as they’re Chrome OS-based machines.
Below, you’ll find a breakdown of each test and the reasons why we run them. For a much deeper look at our review methodology, check out how PCWorld tests laptops.
Windows laptops
- PCMark 10: PCMark 10 is how we determine how well the laptop handles lighter tasks like web browsing, word processing, spreadsheets, and so on.
- HandBrake: HandBrake is more intensive than PCMark 10. It basically measures how long a laptop’s CPU takes to encode a beefy 30GB file.
- Cinebench: Cinebench is a brief stress test of the CPU cores. It does this by rendering a 2D scene over a short period of time.
- 3DMark: 3DMark checks if 3D performance remains consistent over time by running graphic-intensive clips.
- Video rundown test: To gauge battery life, we loop a 4K video using Windows 10’s Movies & TV app until the laptop dies.
FAQ
1.What should I look for in a laptop for video editing?
The first thing to look for in a laptop for video editing is its CPU and GPU. The faster your hardware, the faster your edits.
If your workload is primarily CPU-driven, we’d recommend springing for the Intel Core i7 or the Intel Core i9. HX is designed for raw horsepower, which id deal for gaming and content creation, and the Ultra is built around power efficiency. For a more in-depth look at the difference between the two processors, we’ve done a thorough compare and contrast piece that really lays it all out. For those on a strict budget, you can get by with an Intel Core i5, but it’s going to be slower.
You probably won’t need a dedicated graphics card everyday video editing, but if you work on motion graphics, then the extra firepower really comes in handy. For most video editing projects, we’d suggest the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 or higher, though having any RTX GPU onboard can help accelerate some specific workloads. For those who prefer AMD over Nvidia, we’d recommend the AMD Radeon RX 7600S or higher. Unless you’re looking to play AAA games on the side, you don’t really need the best graphics card out there. A mid-range GPU will serve most people.
Another thing to consider is storage size. A 4K video, for example, will require more storage space than a 1080p video. In other words, you’re going to need quite a bit of storage, otherwise your laptop might get too bogged down. For those who work with 4K resolution, you should go for at least 1TB of SSD or higher. You could probably get by with just 512GB of SSD storage, but you’ll probably need to keep offloading files onto an external storage device.
RAM is important too, as it determines how fast your laptop will generally run. Video editors tend to work with large files, which can cause your laptop to slow down. That’s why we’d recommend at least 16GB of RAM. However, if you’re editing 4K video, you’ll definitely want 32GB of RAM or more. More RAM reduces the likelihood of bottlenecks, which can be a real pain in the neck when you’re in the middle of an important edit.
2.What kind of display should I get?
You’re going to want a display that’s both bright and color accurate. For example, a display that’s close to 100 percent of the sRGB spectrum is ideal. While a 4K display isn’t necessary, we’d strongly recommend it for serious video editing. A high resolution display will produce sharper images, which helps reduce eye strain, and allow you to edit 4K video at full resolution. A larger screen like a 15- or 17-inch is preferable as well, as it provides better visibility for editing.
3.What do the experts recommend?
PCWorld video director Adam Patrick Murray stresses that an ideal laptop for video editing includes an SD card reader for grabbing video off of a camera. He also recommends opting for a notebook with a 4K, 60Hz panel over the ultra-fast 1080p panels often found on gaming laptops that would otherwise be ideal for video editing. You need a 4K panel to edit 4K videos well and blazing-fast refresh rates don’t mean anything for video editing like they do for gaming. If color accuracy matters to you—it might not if you’re only creating casual videos for your personal YouTube channel, for example—then support for the full DCI-P3 color gamut is also a must along with Delta E < 2 color accuracy.
You won’t often find those sorts of specs listed for (or supported by) gaming laptops, but dedicated content creation laptops should include that information. That said, if you want the fastest possible laptop for video editing that can also satisfy your gaming proclivities, you can always pair that burly gaming laptop with a color-accurate external monitor for creation tasks.
3 easy side hustles OpenAI’s Operator just made possible – plus how you can get started
Mensent Photography/Getty Images OpenAI recently announced Operator, an AI agent designed to perform tasks on the web.
After testing it (yes, I paid the $200 bucks, but, more importantly, I kept the subscription🤯), this is a game-changer, but not for the reason you think.
This article will probably get me in trouble with my business partner.
Also: Will AI kill creativity and destroy human innovation? Here’s the unsettling truth
I’m about to snitch on myself for your benefit. 😩
I’m going to tell you the secret sauce behind how our ecom business generates millions in revenue and how Operator can help.
In this article, I’ll break down:
- What Operator is and why it matters
- The good, the bad, and the ugly of using it
- Three ways you can turn Operator into a side hustle
Grab a pen and paper if you’re into this kind of stuff. You’ll want to take notes. 🧐
Quick intro
To understand why this is a game changer, first, you must understand who I am and what I do for a living.
If you are new to my work, my name is Lester, but feel free to call me Les.
I’m a founder with a successful exit under my belt. These days, I’m the exec chair for a group of ecom brands, but at my core, I’m an award-winning performance marketer. 🤓☝️
Also: From zero to millions? How regular people are cashing in on AI
Needless to say, data and insights are my jam. We operate more like a data company than an ecom brand. Our secret sauce? Pairing data and insights with ideas that generate revenue.
If you are into leveraging AI or emerging tech to help your workflow or generate revenue, check out my free newsletter, No Fluff Just Facts. I break down what is working in the world of AI along with actionable insights to implement… no fluff, just facts (see what I did there).
But enough about me. I have to tell you why Operator is a game changer! 🤫
What is Operator and why it’s a game changer
Operator helps US-based PRO users perform browser activities like filling out forms and ordering groceries; apparently, it can even help you create memes. 💃
It interacts with web pages by clicking, typing, and scrolling like a human.
A new AI model powers Operator called Computer Using Agent (CUA), combined with GPT-4’s vision and capabilities for advanced reasoning. This is what allows it to understand what is happening on a website.
Now that you’re all caught up, let me share the opportunities. 🤗
Also: The billion-dollar AI company no one is talking about – and why you should care
Price is the biggest complaint among users. At $200 per month, it’s a significant jump from the $20 plan, and many don’t see enough value to make the upgrade worthwhile, which is a valid point.
But instead of comparing it to the cheaper plan, I look at it in terms of the time and resources it can save.
A big part of my day job is validating ideas, visiting different websites, looking at trends, and documenting them. While this is not the best use of time, it is still necessary and has a cost, whether I do it myself or hire an assistant to do it for me.
$200 is a lot of bread, especially in this economy, but the alternative could cost thousands of dollars per month and tens of thousands per year. 🤧
Operator allows small business owners and professionals to automate without hiring or paying a developer to create an internal tool.
Sure, there are online tools that can perform similar functions, but that is yet another tool to learn. OpenAI is already part of my workflow, so having everything in one place is beneficial.
Also: Have a genealogy mystery? How I used AI to solve a family puzzle
Operator is a great tool to handle the mundane, time-consuming tasks I don’t want to do.
And for $200 bucks? 🤔
Pffft. Have at it, Operator.
Let me know when you’re done or if you need me.
The biggest limitation may not be Operator itself, but our imagination when using it.
How I use Operator
Ah yes, the reason why my biz partner may beat my you-know-what.
First, I need to explain the core of any business. ☝️
Most businesses operate on some form of arbitrage, whether it’s sourcing a product at a lower cost and selling it at a higher price, or offering a service where the cost to deliver is lower than the price charged.
Whether you are selling a product or service, the core of what is happening is the same.
The key is creating value while managing cost differences between markets.
Also: Don’t want to pay for ChatGPT Deep Research? Try this free open-source alternative
Now that we understand that, let’s dig into how we build businesses. 🧐
Everyone sees Amazon as a place to buy, but we consider it a place to validate product ideas.
Let’s say we have an idea for a funny candle. We go to Amazon first to see if the concept already exists. If it does, we document things like:
- Product name
- Price
- Sales rank
Lester Mapp This information is critical. The arbitrage is then sourcing that product and introducing it to our audience.
Bonus tip: We do not just copy. We look at how a product can be improved and offer our audience the new and improved version on our website.
Make sense?
Now that we have that out of the way, let me explain how we used Operator. 😎
As I mentioned, part of the job is endless scrolling — looking and looking. I instructed Operator to do my product research for me.
Here is the exact prompt I used:
“I need you to go to www.amazon.com and search ‘funny candles.’ I then need you to tell me the price and name of each listing. Then, I need you to tell me the sales rank for the first 48 product listings.”
After a CAPTCHA and a little finessing with the prompt, I got the exact output I needed.
Operator was able to handle the most critical role in our business, which is product research.
Also: Are ChatGPT Plus or Pro worth it? Here’s how they compare to the free version
It freed up my time and allowed me to focus on things like talking to customers. 👨💻
Nobody likes doing these types of tasks as they are monotonous and tedious. It’s all the “ous-es” you can think of.
But it is vital for staying ahead.
Operator did it autonomously for the most part.
Like I said, it’s a game changer.
The good, the bad, and the kind of ugly
The good 👍
- I like the fact that I can operate independently without having to wait for a coworker or a developer to help. If you are anything like me, you know exactly what I mean by that. I would rather wash my eyes with bleach than wait for someone.
- I also love that I can speak, and it appears. I do not have to write a fancy brief or send ten gazillion emails to get what I want.
- I love the fact that it is centralized. I don’t need ten apps and integrations to do one thing. I allow it to log into things like Google Sheets and copy the info.
The bad 👎
- It’s not all the way there. It is AI. It does weird AI stuff, like hallucinating and providing incorrect and nonsensical information. I stay patient and keep it pushing.
- It’s slow, but still faster than me at getting the job done. Honestly, I can’t even call that a real complaint.
- It was asking me for confirmation way too much. This meant Operator would stop and sit there waiting for my input while I was off living my best life. Time wasted. To combat this, I turned on notifications to see if that improves the time between confirmations. I will let you know how it goes.
The kinda ugly 🥴
Sure, there are flaws and things that could be better, but at this moment, the real issue is me. I wish I could think of even more creative ways to use it.
To be clear, I’m not talking about everyday stuff like grocery shopping. That’s table stakes.
I mean, how do I get this thing to 10x my business while I am on vacation? 🙃
How to make money with OpenAI Operator
With any emerging technology, there will always be a group of people who:
- Need help implementing
- Do not have the time to do it themselves
There’s potential to build a business around either of these scenarios. 🤑
Also: ChatGPT’s Deep Research just identified 20 jobs it will replace. Is yours on the list?
In my humble opinion, this is a great place to start, especially if you are an early mover, as it could position you as the go-to resource.
That said, here are a few more ideas on how you can use Operator to generate income.
1. AI automation as a service
Offer automation services to businesses that want to streamline repetitive tasks like data entry, email responses, or customer support.
2. AI-powered lead generation and sales automation
Use Operator to send personalized messages to potential leads on LinkedIn about your product or service.
3. AI-powered e-commerce
Use Operator to automatically list, update, and optimize product listings on eBay, Amazon, or Shopify.
These are just a few ideas, but the biggest opportunity is using Operator to enhance what we are already doing.
Rather than looking for some magical new opportunity, the best move is to integrate it into your current workflow.
Operator is a tool that makes us more efficient and provides an opportunity to win back some of our time.
The real opportunity is looking within and asking yourself, what can AI help me do? 🤔
As I mentioned earlier, it really comes down to your imagination and how you use it in your existing workflow or even how you create a new one.
The critics aren’t wrong about its limitations, but the tool is still incredibly powerful. Unlocking its full potential just requires a bit of creativity and a willingness to work around its constraints.
Writing the technology off entirely because it is not there yet is unwise. 😞
My two cents
So, is Operator worth it?
Like most things in life, it depends. 🫤
The price of $200 is relative and depends on how you use it.
If you are using it to book your Airbnb or something like that, I am hard-pressed to find any reason to justify paying $200 for the luxury of not doing it yourself (unless this is your job).
I can see a future where Operator, when used effectively, becomes one of the best business assets in your toolkit by automating repetitive tasks.
However, it’s not a magic fix. You still need to build a strong business by solving real problems and maintaining solid unit economics.
Also: The work tasks people use Claude AI for most, according to Anthropic
We are not at a place where AI can do everything for us. A do-it-with-me approach would be the better way to look at it.
All that said, I am bullish on Operator as a business tool and look forward to seeing where it goes.
😇 Hope this helps; I am rooting for you.
By the way, if you want to learn more about leveraging AI or emerging tech to optimize your workflow or generate revenue, check out my free newsletter, No Fluff Just Facts. I break down what is working in the world of AI, along with actionable insights you can implement and the occasional pep talk. If this sounds like your jam and you wanna be besties forever, click here to sign up. It’s totally free. 🤗